SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| Filed by the registrant | | | þ | | | |
| Filed by a party other than the registrant | o | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Check the appropriate box: |
| o | Preliminary proxy statement | |
| o | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
| þ | Definitive proxy statement | |
| o | Definitive additional materials | |
| o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 | |
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA,
INCORPORATED
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) |
| | |
| (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box): |
| þ | þ | No fee required. |
| | |
| o | o | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
| | |
| (1) | (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | |
| | |
| (2) | (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | |
| | |
| (3) | (3) | Per unit price or underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| | |
| | |
| (4) | (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| | |
| | |
| (5) | (5) | Total fee paid: |
| | |
| | |
| o | o | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
| | |
| | |
| o | o | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. |
| | |
| (1) | (1) | Amount previously paid: |
| | |
| | |
| (2) | (2) | Form, schedule or registration statement no.: |
| | |
| | |
| (3) | | Filing party: |
| | |
| | (3) | Filing party:
| (4) | | |
| | |
| (4) | Date filed: |
NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF
THE SHAREHOLDERS OF
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Chesterfield, Missouri
April 6, 2016
To the Shareholders of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated:
The Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (the "Company") will be held at the Company’s principal executive offices located at 16600 Swingley Ridge Road, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017 on May 19, 2016, commencing at 2:00 p.m. At this meeting only holders of record of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on March 16, 2016 will be entitled to vote, for the following purposes:
| |
1. | To elect one director for a term expiring in 2017 and four directors for terms expiring in 2019; |
| |
2. | To vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers on a non-binding, advisory basis; |
| |
3. | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016; and |
| |
4. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED |
| |
ByNotice of 2024 Annual Meeting of | |
| J. Cliff Eason
Chairman of the Board
Shareholders |
| | | |
| | William L. Hutton
Secretary
TABLE OF CONTENTS
These proxy materials are being provided to you because the Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the Company's 2016 Annual Shareholders' Meeting. This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting. Page references are supplied to help you find additional information in this proxy statement. This proxy statement and the related proxy materials were first made available to shareholders and on the internet on April 6, 2016.
Annual Shareholders’ Meeting
Time: May 19, 2016, 2:00 p.m., Central time
Place: 16600 Swingley Ridge Road, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017
Record Date: Close of business on March 16, 2016
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations |
| | | | | |
Proposal | Board Recommendation | Voting Options | Vote Required to Adopt the Proposal | More Information |
1. | Election of Directors | FOR all nominees | For, against or abstain for each nominee | If a quorum is present, the vote required
to elect each director is a majority of the
common stock represented in person or by
proxy at the Annual Meeting.
| |
2. | Shareholders' Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation | FOR | For, against or abstain | If a quorum is present, the vote required
to approve Item 2 is a majority of the common
stock represented in person or by
proxy at the Annual Meeting.
| |
3. | Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor | FOR | For, against or abstain | If a quorum is present, the vote required
to approve Item 3 is a majority of the common
stock represented in person or by
proxy at the Annual Meeting.
| |
See "Additional Information - Voting" (page 59) for additional information. |
|
| | | | |
| Name | Director Since | Independent | Election for Term Ending | Committee Memberships |
| Anna Manning | 2016 | No | 2017 | None |
| William J. Bartlett | 2004 | Yes | 2019 | Audit; Finance, Investment and Risk Management |
| Christine R. Detrick | 2014 | Yes | 2019 | Audit; Nominating and Governance |
| Alan C. Henderson | 2002 | Yes | 2019 | Finance, Investment and Risk Management; Nominating and Governance |
| Joyce A. Phillips | 2014 | Yes | 2019 | Compensation; Nominating and Governance |
|
| | | | |
Our Board and Its Committees (page 13) |
|
| | | |
| | Number of Members | Percent Independent | Number of Meetings in 2015 |
| Full Board | 11 | 82% | 10 |
| Audit | 4 | 100% | 8 |
| Compensation | 5 | 100% | 7 |
| Finance, Investment and Risk Management | 5 | 80% | 5 |
| Nominating and Governance | 5 | 100% | 4 |
|
| | | | |
Governance Facts (page 10) |
|
| |
Size of Board | 11 |
Number of Independent Directors | 9 |
Audit and Compensation Committees Comprised Entirely of Independent Directors | Yes |
Independent Presiding Director | Yes |
Separate Chairman and CEO | Yes |
Majority Voting for Directors in Uncontested Elections | Yes |
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation | Annual |
Annual Board and Committee Self-Evaluations | Yes |
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executive Officers | Yes |
Restrictions on Hedging and Pledging of Company Shares for Directors and Employees | Yes |
Executive Incentive Recoupment (Clawback) Policy | Yes |
Shareholder Rights Plan (Poison Pill) | No |
|
| | | | |
2015 Executive Compensation Highlights (page 16) |
|
| | |
Annual Bonus Plan (based only on overall Company financial performance) |
| Metric | Actual Results | % of Target Payout |
Operating Income Per Share1 (50%) | $8.43/share | 85.8% |
Book Value Per Share Excluding AOCI1 (25%) | $83.23/share | 82.0% |
| New Business Embedded Value (15%) | $610 million | 200.0% |
| Annual Consolidated Revenue (10%) | $10.4 billion | 85.8% |
| Payout | 101.9% of target |
| | | |
| 2013-2015 Performance Contingent Share Program |
| Metric | Actual Results | % of Target Payout |
| Three-Year Cumulative Revenue Growth Rate | 3.5% | 0% |
Three-Year Operating Return on Equity1 | 10.2% | 55.3% |
| Three-Year Relative Return on Equity | To be determined late April 2016 | To be determined late April 2016 |
| Payout | To be determined late April 2016 |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page #SectionPage# for reconciliations to GAAP figures. | |
2015 Business Highlights
Summarized below are highlights of our financial performance for 2015:
Our full year net premiums totaled $8.6 billion in 2015.
| |
• | Our full year earnings per diluted share: operating income1 $8.43, net income $7.46.
|
| |
• | Our full year operating return on equity1 was 11% for 2015.
|
Book value per share at year-end 2015 was $94.09 including accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI"), and $83.23 excluding AOCI, an 8% increase on a total return basis.
For additional information on our 2015 financial performance, see our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
| | | |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 61 for reconciliations to GAAP figures. |
|
| | | | |
Five Elements of Executive Compensation (page 23) |
|
| | | | | |
| Element | Form | Key Features |
1. | Base Salary | Cash | ● | Intended to attract and retain top talent. |
● | Generally positioned near the 50th percentile of our pay level peer group, but varies with individual skills, experience, responsibilities and performance. |
● | Represents approximately 26.9% of named executive officer target total compensation for 2015. |
2. | Annual Bonus
Plan
| Cash | ● | Tied to one or more of the following factors: overall Company performance, performance of the participant's division or business unit and/or individual performance. |
● | Performance goals established at the beginning of each fiscal year. |
● | Payouts range from 0% of target payout to 200% of target payout, depending on performance. |
● | Intended to motivate annual performance with respect to key financial and other measures. |
● | Represents approximately 27.9% of named executive officer target total compensation for 2015. |
3. | Performance
Contingent
Shares
| Equity | ● | Tied to cumulative revenue growth rate over a three-year period, three-year operating ROE and three -year Relative ROE. |
● | Performance goals established at the beginning of each 3-year cycle. |
● | Payouts range from 0% of target payout to 200% of target payout, depending on performance. |
● | Intended to motivate intermediate performance with respect to key financial measures and align our named executive officers' interests with those of our shareholders. |
● | Represents approximately 30.7% of named executive officer target total compensation for 2015. |
4. | Stock
Appreciation
Rights
| Equity | ● | Fully vests on December 31 of the fourth year of grant (25% per year). |
● | Intended to motivate long-term performance, promote appropriate risk-taking, align our named executive officers' interests with shareholders' interests and promote retention. |
● | Represents approximately 14.5% of named executive officer target total compensation for 2015. |
5. | Retirement and Pension Benefits | Deferred Cash | Our retirement and pension benefits are designed to provide a competitive level of post-employment income as part of a total rewards package that permits us to attract and retain key members of our management.
U.S. Executives:
|
● | Savings Plan with 401(k) (pre-tax) and Roth 401(k) (after-tax) plan components that provide Company matching contributions in compliance with IRS limits. |
● | Qualified pension plan that is a broad-based retirement plan providing a source of income during retirement. |
● | Nonqualified restoration savings and pension plans, that provide contributions without regard to IRS limits. |
● | Nonqualified savings plan in which deferrals can be made on a pre-tax basis without regard to qualified plan limits. |
Canadian Executives:
|
● | A broad-based defined contribution registered pension plan that provides Company matching contributions in accordance with the Supplemental Pension Plans Act of Quebec as well as the Canadian Income Tax Act. |
● | Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Canadian executives providing annual pension income in addition to amounts payable from any registered pension plan. |
PROXY STATEMENT
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
The Board of Directors of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (the "Company") is making this proxy solicitation in connection with the Company's 20162024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 2:00 p.m. on May 19, 2016,22, 2024, and all adjournments and postponements thereof. The Company is first making available this Proxy Statement and the Company's Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152023 and this Proxy Statement on April 6, 2016. The solicitation will primarily be by internet and mail and the expense thereof will be paid by the Company. In addition, proxies may be solicited by directors, officers or employees of the Company in person, or by telephone, facsimile transmission or other electronic means of communication.11, 2024.
The close of business on March 16, 201628, 2024 has been fixed as the record date for the determination of the Company shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the record date, approximately 64,059,13865,786,319 shares of common stock were outstanding and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting.
Information about Annual Shareholders' Meeting
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETINGDate: May 22, 2024
Time: 2:00 p.m., Central time
Place: 16600 Swingley Ridge Road, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Items of Business | Board Recommendation | More Information |
| 1. | To elect all directors for a one-year term | FOR | |
| 2. | Say-on-pay: advisory vote on executive compensation | FOR | |
| 3. | To approve the adoption of an Employee Stock Purchase Plan | FOR | |
| 4. | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche as the Company's independent Auditor for 2024 | FOR | |
| 5. | To consider any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement | - | page 81 |
| See "Voting Matters - Vote Requirements" (page 9) for additional information. |
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Shareholders' Meeting
The Company’sCompany's Notice of Annual Meeting, 20162024 Proxy Statement and 20152023 Annual Report to Shareholders are available on the Company’sCompany's website at www.rgare.com. Information on our website does not constitute part of this Proxy Statement.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
How to Cast Your Vote
Your vote is important. Please cast your vote and play a part in the future of the Company. Shareholders of record, who hold shares registered in their names with the Company's transfer agent, can vote by:
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Internet at www.proxyvote.com | calling 1-800-690-6903 toll-free from the U.S. or Canada | mail return the signed proxy card |
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote and submit your proxy through one of the methods above as soon as possible so that your shares may be represented at the meeting.
| | | | | |
| |
| By | |
| Stephen T. O'Hearn, Chair of the Board |
| |
| William L. Hutton, Secretary |
| | | | | |
| Table of Contents | |
| |
| Page No. |
| | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Proxy Statement Summary
These proxy materials are being provided to you because the Company's Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the Company's 2024 Annual Shareholders'Meeting. This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement ("Proxy Statement"). This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting. Page references are supplied to help you find additional information in this Proxy Statement. This Proxy Statement and the related proxy materials were first made available to shareholders and on the Internet on April 11, 2024.
Annual Shareholders' Meeting
Date & Time: May 22, 2024, 2:00 p.m., Central time
Place: 16600 Swingley Ridge Road, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017
Record Date: Close of business on March 28, 2024
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Items of Business | Board Recommendation | More Information |
| 1. | To elect all directors for a one-year term | FOR | |
| 2. | Say-on-pay: advisory vote on executive compensation | FOR | |
| 3. | To approve the adoption of an Employee Stock Purchase Plan | FOR | |
| 4. | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche as the Company's independent Auditor for 2024 | FOR | |
| 5. | To consider any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement | - | page 81 |
| See "Voting Matters - Vote Requirements" (page 9) for additional information. |
How to Cast Your Vote
Your vote is important. Please cast your vote and play a part in the future of the Company. Shareholders of record, who hold shares registered in their names with the Company's transfer agent, can vote by:
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
Internet at www.proxyvote.com | calling 1-800-690-6903 toll-free from the U.S. or Canada | mail return the signed proxy card |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Director Since | Independent | Election for Term Ending | Committee Memberships |
| Pina Albo | 2019 | Yes | 2025 | Human Capital and Compensation
Investment
Nominating and Governance |
| Michele Bang | 2023 | Yes | 2025 | Audit
Cybersecurity and Technology
Risk |
| Tony Cheng | 2023 | No | 2025 | None |
| John J. Gauthier | 2018 | Yes | 2025 | Human Capital and Compensation
Investment, Chair
Risk |
| Patricia L. Guinn | 2016 | Yes | 2025 | Audit, Chair
Investment
Nominating and Governance |
| Hazel M. McNeilage | 2018 | Yes | 2025 | Cybersecurity and Technology
Human Capital and Compensation, Chair
Risk |
| George Nichols III | 2022 | Yes | 2025 | Cybersecurity and Technology
Human Capital and Compensation
Nominating and Governance |
| Stephen O'Hearn (Chair) | 2020 | Yes | 2025 | None |
| Alison Rand | 2024 | Yes | 2025 | None |
| Shundrawn Thomas | 2021 | Yes | 2025 | Human Capital and Compensation
Investment
Nominating and Governance, Chair |
| Khanh T. Tran | 2022 | Yes | 2025 | Audit
Investment
Risk, Chair |
| Steven C. Van Wyk | 2019 | Yes | 2025 | Audit
Cybersecurity and Technology, Chair
Risk |
Board and Committees (page 20) ITEM | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Members | Percent Independent | Number of Meetings in 2023 |
| Full Board | 12 | 92% | 18 |
| Audit | 4 | 100% | 12 |
| Cybersecurity and Technology | 4 | 100% | 6 |
| Human Capital and Compensation | 5 | 100% | 7 |
| Investment | 5 | 100% | 4 |
| Nominating and Governance | 4 | 100% | 4 |
| Risk | 5 | 100% | 4 |
Board Diversity Snapshot
| | | | | |
| Board Composition and Structure: | |
| Size of Board | 12 |
| Number of Independent Directors | 11 |
| New Directors Appointed Since 2019 | 9 |
| Independent Chair | Yes |
| All Committees Comprised Entirely of Independent Directors | Yes |
| Regular Board and Committee Assessments | Yes |
| Accountability to Shareholders: | |
| Annual Director Elections | Yes |
| Majority Voting for Director Elections | Yes |
| Proxy Access | Yes |
| Supermajority Vote Provisions | No |
| Shareholder Rights Plan (Poison Pill) | No |
| Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation | Annual |
| Alignment of Interests with Shareholders: | |
| Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executive Officers | Yes |
| Restrictions on Hedging and Pledging of Company Shares for Directors and Employees | Yes |
| Executive Incentive Recoupment (Clawback) Policies (mandatory NYSE policy and additional voluntarily adopted policy) | Yes |
| |
Chief Executive Officer
On December 31, 2023, Anna Manning, our former Chief Executive Officer, retired. Tony Cheng, our President since January 2023, assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer on January 1, - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS2024.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Five Elements of Executive Compensation (page 40) |
| | | | | |
| Element | Form | Key Features |
| 1. | Base Salary | Cash | ● | The only fixed compensation element, intended to attract and retain top talent. |
| ● | Generally, we target base salary around the median of our peer companies, but this varies with individual skills, experience, responsibilities, performance and location. |
| ● | Represents 19.4%* of the average named executive officer target total compensation for 2023. |
| 2. | Annual Bonus
Plan | Cash | ● | Serves as an annual performance incentive to achieve established business goals. |
| ● | Tied to one or more of the following factors: overall Company performance, performance of the participant's division or business unit and individual performance. |
| ● | Performance goals established in the first quarter of each year with financial goals of each business unit aligning to corporate goals. |
| ● | Payouts range from 0% of target payout to 200% of target payout, depending on performance. |
| ● | The Annual Bonus Plan company-wide objectives were measured using the following components: (i) adjusted operating income per share; (ii) strategic scorecard; (iii) new business embedded value and (iv) annual adjusted consolidated revenue. The strategic scorecard is an assessment of performance in four focus areas for 2023: alternative capital; Creation Re; cybersecurity and data loss prevention; and DEI. See page 43 for a description of those components. |
| ● | Represents 28.5%* of the average named executive officer target total compensation for 2023. |
| 3. | Performance
Contingent
Awards | Equity | ● | Serves as a performance incentive to achieve established intermediate-term financial measures and align our executives' interests with those of our shareholders. |
| ● | Performance goals established at the beginning of each three-year cycle and fully vest after three years. |
| ● | Payouts range from 0% of target payout to 200% of target payout, depending on Company performance. |
| ● | For 2022 and 2023 awards, the Company measured financial performance over a three-year period, consistent with historical practice. Performance is based on (i) three-year average adjusted return on equity and (ii) three-year book value per share, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income, growth rate. Results may be modified up or down by a maximum of 10% based on three-year relative total shareholder return. Targets established for the 2022 grant were adjusted for impacts of Long-Duration Targeted Improvements ("LDTI") under new GAAP accounting rules effective January 1, 2023. |
| ● | For the 2023 PCS grants, PCS represents 100% of the long-term compensation grant for the CEO, 75% for the President and 60% for all other named executive officers. |
| ● | Performance contingent awards represented 38.3%* of the average named executive officer target total compensation for 2023. |
| 4. | Stock Based
Awards | Equity | ● | Intended to motivate performance, promote appropriate risk-taking, align our named executive officers' long-term interests with shareholders' interests and promote retention. |
| ● | Stock appreciation rights vest 25% per year, on December 31 of each year. |
| ● | Restricted Share Units cliff-vest after a three year period. |
| ● | Restricted share units represented 5.6%* of the average named executive officer target total compensation for 2023. |
| ● | Stock appreciation rights represented 8.2%* of the average named executive officer target total compensation for 2023. |
| 5. | Retirement and Pension Benefits | Deferred Cash | ● | Intended to provide a competitive level of post-employment income as part of a total rewards package that supports our ability to attract and retain key members of our management. |
| ● | In the U.S. there are two types of plans: qualified plans and non-qualified plans. |
| ● | Qualified plans are provided to eligible employees up to specified maximum amounts as determined by federal tax authorities. |
| ● | Non-qualified plans are provided to eligible employees who earn compensation above the maximum amounts established by federal tax authorities. |
| ● | Hong Kong retirement and pension benefits are split between: (i) a mandatory provident fund where employees and employer contribute up to a maximum amount and (ii) a supplementary fund for compensation in excess of the maximum amount applicable to the mandatory provident fund benefit. |
| *Calculation excludes pension and retirement benefits. Average percentages are rounded. |
| | | | | |
The performance contingent awards and the stock-based awards described above collectively form the Company's long-term incentive ("LTI") plan. For 2023, the LTI was allocated as follows:
•100% PCS for Ms. Manning;
•75% PCS and 25% SARs for Mr. Cheng; and
•60% PCS, 20% RSUs and 20% SARs for all other named executive officers.
The structure of the 2023 LTI award for Ms. Manning took into consideration that 2023 was her last year as Chief Executive Officer.
2024 Compensation Changes (page 53) In March 2024 the Human Capital and Compensation Committee approved the following changes to the Company's compensation programs:
•The design of the Annual Bonus Plan was changed to utilize an enterprise pool plan design. The Company will use a top-down pool design, where funding is driven by performance against key financial and non-financial metrics at the Company level.
•The total shareholder return modifier for determining payouts for performance contingent awards was increased from 10% to 20% to continue to strengthen alignment for long-term incentive compensation with the experience of our shareholders.
•Stock appreciation rights and restricted stock unit grants will now vest ratably over a three-year term. Previously, stock appreciation rights vested ratably over four years and restricted stock units cliff-vested after three years.
Item 1 – Election of Directors
The first item to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting is the election of Anna Manning, William J. Bartlett, Christine R. Detrick, Alan C. Henderson and Joyce A. Phillips as directorsthe following director nominees to the Company's Board of Directors, each with a term ending at the Company. Company's 2025 annual meeting of shareholders:
| | | | | | | | |
| Name | Director Since | Independent |
| Pina Albo | 2019 | Yes |
| Michele Bang | 2023 | Yes |
| Tony Cheng | 2023 | No |
| John J. Gauthier | 2018 | Yes |
| Patricia L. Guinn | 2016 | Yes |
| Hazel M. McNeilage | 2018 | Yes |
| George Nichols III | 2022 | Yes |
| Stephen O'Hearn (Chair) | 2020 | Yes |
| Alison Rand | 2024 | Yes |
| Shundrawn Thomas | 2021 | Yes |
| Khanh T. Tran | 2022 | Yes |
| Steven C. Van Wyk | 2019 | Yes |
The Board nominates each of these individuals for election at the Annual Meeting. Each nominee is currently a member of the Board.
Ms. Manning stands All director nominees stand for election for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders in 2017. Messrs. Bartlett and Henderson and Mses. Detrick and Phillips each stand for election for terms expiring at the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders in 2019.one-year term. Should any one or more of the nominees be unable or unwilling to serve (which is not expected), the proxies (except proxies marked to the contrary) will be voted for such other person or persons as the Board may recommend.recommend unless such proxies are marked otherwise.
Appointment of New Director
Effective December 1, 2015, the Company announced the appointment of Anna Manning as President, succeeding A. Greig Woodring. Prior to becoming President, Ms. Manning held the position of Senior Executive Vice President, Structured Solutions. Mr. Woodring will remain CEO until his planned
retirement in late 2016, at which time the BoardSee "Board of Directors expectsand Corporate Governance" beginning on page 11 for further information related to appoint Ms. Manning as Chief Executive Officer. The Board appointed Ms. Manning to the Board"Item 1 - Election of Directors effective January 1, 2016.Directors."Nominees and Continuing Directors
The Board currently has eleven directors who are divided into three classes, one of which contains three directors and two of which contain four directors. The term of office for each class is three years. Certain information with respect to the director nominees proposed by the Company and the other directors whose terms of office will continue after the Annual Meeting is set forth below.
Vote Required
If a quorum is present, theThe vote required to elect each director is a majority of the common stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Meeting and entitled to vote on this matter.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The CompanyBoard of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees for election as a director.
Item 2 – Shareholders' Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
The Dodd-Frank Act enables our shareholders to vote to approve, on an advisory basis (i.e., non-binding), the Board.
To Be Electedcompensation of the named executive officers as Director for Term Endingdisclosed in 2017this Proxy Statement
pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K (including in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, compensation tables and accompanying narrative disclosures).
The Company has a "pay-for-performance" philosophy that forms the foundation of all decisions regarding compensation of the named executive officers. This compensation philosophy, and the program structure approved by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee (the "Committee"), is central to our ability to attract, retain and motivate individuals who can achieve superior financial results. Please refer to "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Overview of Compensation Practices" for further discussion of the compensation of the named executive officers. A primary focus of the Committee is whether the Company's executive compensation program serves the best interests of the Company's shareholders. At the Company's 2023 Annual Meeting, 95% of votes cast on the proposal approved the compensation program described in the proxy statement for that meeting.
| | |
| 2023 Say on Pay Votes |
| Percentage of Votes Cast in Favor of "Say on Pay" |
Anna Manning |
|
| Business Experience: Prior to becoming President of the Company in December 2015, Ms. Manning held the position of Senior Executive Vice President, Structured Solutions, which includes the Company’s Global Financial Solutions and Global Acquisitions businesses. Prior to assuming this role, Ms. Manning spent four years as Executive Vice President, U.S. Markets. Ms. Manning joined the Company in 2007, and shortly thereafter assumed the role of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for the International Division. Prior to joining RGA, Ms. Manning spent 19 years in actuarial consulting at Tillinghast Towers Perrin, following an actuarial career in the Canadian marketplace at Manulife Financial from 1981-1988. She holds a B.Sc. in Actuarial Science from the University of Toronto, is a Fellow of the Canadian Institute of Actuaries and a Fellow of the Society of Actuaries.
|
President of the Company | Skills and Qualifications: RGA’s President since December 1, 2015; extensive knowledge of the Company’s business, operations and customers; extensive knowledge and relationships in the global financial services and life insurance business; actuarial experience; mergers and acquisitions
|
Age: 57
Director since: 2016
Not Independent
95% |
To Be ElectedAt the Company's 2022 Annual Meeting, 62% of votes cast on the proposal approved the compensation program described in the proxy statement for that meeting. As a result, the Company engaged in the extensive shareholder outreach efforts described in last year's proxy statement to obtain feedback from our shareholders. We adjusted our compensation structure and disclosures in light of that feedback. Prior to 2022, shareholder feedback at our previous annual meetings was uniformly positive as Director for Term Endingreflected in 2019the following table:
| | | | | |
| Say on Pay Votes (2012-2021) |
| Annual Meeting Year | Percentage of Votes Cast in Favor of "Say on Pay" |
| 2021 | 95% |
| 2020 | 98% |
| 2019 | 98% |
| 2018 | 98% |
| 2017 | 98% |
| 2016 | 98% |
| 2015 | 98% |
| 2014 | 97% |
| 2013 | 99% |
| 2012 | 96% |
| Ten Year Average | 97.5% |
We are asking our shareholders to approve the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, including the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" and "Compensation Tables" discussions. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of the named executive officers and the policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. This vote is advisory and therefore not binding on the Company, the Committee or the Board. However, the Board and the Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer
|
| |
William J. Bartlett
|
|
| Business Experience: Mr. Bartlett was an accountant and consultant with Ernst & Young for over 35 years and advised numerous clients in the global insurance industry. He was appointed a partner of Ernst & Young in Sydney, Australia in July 1980, a position he held until his retirement in June 2003. He served as chairman of the firm’s global insurance practice from 1991 to 2000, and was chairman of the Australian insurance practice group from 1989 to 1998. Mr. Bartlett currently serves as an independent, non-executive director of Suncorp Group Limited, GWA Limited and the Abacus Property Trust, all of which are listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. He previously served as a member of the Australian Life Insurance Actuarial Standards Board and as a consultant to the Australian Financial Reporting Council on Auditor Independence. He holds several professional memberships in Australia (ACPA and FCA), South Africa (CASA), and the United Kingdom (FCMA).
|
Retired partner, Ernst & Young Australia | Skills and Qualifications: Public accounting experience in global insurance accounting practice; audit committee experience; financial services and life insurance business; international business
|
Age: 66
Director since: 2004
Independent
|
compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will carefully consider those shareholders' concerns when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers and will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
Vote Required
The vote required to approve this Item 2 is a majority of Contents
the common stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this matter. |
| |
Christine R. Detrick |
|
| Business Experience: Ms. Detrick served as a Director/Partner, Leader of Americas Financial Services Practice, and Senior Advisor of Bain & Company, Inc., a global management consulting firm, from 2002 to 2012. Before joining Bain, Ms. Detrick served for 10 years at A.T. Kearney, Inc., a global management consulting firm, including as Director, Global Leader of Financial Services Practice, and as Leader, Eastern U.S. Profit Center. Prior to those roles, she was a founding partner of First Financial Partners, a venture capital firm specializing in savings and loan institutions, from 1988 to 1992, and served as Chief Executive Officer for St. Louis Bank for Savings. Ms. Detrick formerly served on the board of Forethought Financial Group, Inc. a private life insurance carrier and currently serves as an independent director and member of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee of the boards of Forest City Enterprises, a publicly traded real estate company, and Hartford Mutual Funds.
|
Former Director and Head of Americas Financial Services Practice of Bain & Company, Inc. | Skills and Qualifications: Corporate finance and financial reporting; investments; financial services and life insurance business; mergers and acquisitions; management and business consulting experience
|
Age: 57
Director since: 2014
Independent
|
Alan C. Henderson |
|
| Business Experience: Mr. Henderson was President and Chief Executive Officer of RehabCare Group, Inc. ("RehabCare") from June 1998 until June 2003. Prior to becoming President and Chief Executive Officer, he was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of RehabCare from 1991 through May 1998. Mr. Henderson was a director of RehabCare from June 1998 to December 2003, Angelica Corporation from March 2001 to June 2003, and General American Capital Corp., a registered investment company, from October 1989 to April 2003.
|
Retired President and Chief Executive Officer of RehabCare Group, Inc. | Skills and Qualifications: Audit committee experience; experience as CEO and CFO of a public company; public company accounting and finance
|
Age: 70
Director since: 2002
Independent
| |
Joyce A. Phillips | |
| Business Experience: Ms. Phillips is Chief Executive Officer, Global Wealth, Group Managing Director, and Management Board member at Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ). Prior to joining ANZ in 2009, Ms. Phillips was President and Chief Operating Officer at American Life Insurance Company (ALICO), a subsidiary of American International Group, Inc. (AIG), which had operations in 55 countries. She joined ALICO from Citigroup, where she was head of International Retail Banking, responsible for strengthening product distribution and expansion in Citigroup’s global retail banking franchise in 42 countries. Her previous roles include various senior positions in Citigroup Japan and GE Capital.
|
CEO, Global Wealth, Group Managing Director, and Management Board member at Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited | Skills and Qualifications: Experience as an executive officer of major global financial services companies; financial services and life insurance business; risk management
|
Age: 53
Director since: 2014
Independent
|
CONTINUING DIRECTORS
To Continue in Office Until 2017 |
| |
Arnoud W.A. Boot |
|
| Business Experience: Mr. Boot has been a professor of Corporate Finance and Financial Markets at the University of Amsterdam and director of the Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics since 2002. He is the founder and director of the Amsterdam Center for Corporate Finance. Prior to his current positions, Mr. Boot was a partner in the Finance and Strategy Practice at McKinsey & Company from 2000 through 2001, was the Vice Dean, Faculty of Economics and Econometrics at the University of Amsterdam from 1998 through 2000 and president of the European Finance Association in 2008. Mr. Boot serves as Chairman of the Bank Council of the Dutch Central Bank and is a member of the Dutch Scientific Council for Government Policy and the Dutch Social Economic Council. He is a member of the Advisory Scientific Committee of the European Systemic Risk Board in Frankfurt and he also serves as a research fellow at the Centre for Economic Policy Research in London and the Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
|
Professor of Corporate Finance and Financial Markets at the University of Amsterdam and Director of the Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics | Skills and Qualifications: Management and business consulting experience; corporate finance; investments; risk management; international business, markets and operations
|
Age: 56
Director since: 2009
Independent
|
John F. Danahy |
|
| Business Experience: Mr. Danahy was previously the Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of May Merchandising Company and May Department Stores International, subsidiaries of The May Department Stores Company (MDSC). Mr. Danahy served in various positions within MDSC for 38 years until his retirement in 2006. Mr. Danahy previously served as corporate-wide Senior Vice President of Information Technology and as Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of The Famous-Barr Co. for five years. Mr. Danahy has an Executive Master of Business Administration degree from the Olin Business School at Washington University in St. Louis.
|
Retired Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of May Merchandising Company and May Department Stores International | Skills and Qualifications: Information technology; international business; management and business experience; public company management experience
|
Age: 69
Director since: 2009
Independent
|
J. Cliff Eason (Chair) | |
| Business Experience: Mr. Eason is Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors and was President and CEO of Southwestern Bell Telephone, SBC Communications, Inc. ("SBC") from September 2000 through January 2001. Mr. Eason previously served as President, Network Services from 1999 through 2000; President, SBC International, from 1998 until 1999; President and CEO of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ("SWBTC") from 1996 until 1998; President and CEO of Southwestern Bell Communications, Inc. from 1995 through 1996; President of Network Services of SWBTC from 1993 through 1995; and President of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company of the Midwest from 1992 to 1993. He held various other positions with SBC and its subsidiaries prior to 1992. Mr. Eason was a director of Williams Communications Group, Inc. until his retirement in January 2001. Mr. Eason served as a director of Mercantile Bankcorp from 1993 to 1995.
|
Retired President and CEO of Southwestern Bell Telephone, SBC Communications, Inc. | Skills and Qualifications: Information technology; international business; management and business experience; public company management experience
|
Age: 68
Director since: 1993
Independent
|
To Continue in Office Until 2018 |
| |
Frederick J. Sievert |
|
| Business Experience: Mr. Sievert was President of New York Life Insurance Company from 2002 through 2007. Mr. Sievert shared responsibility for overall company management in the Office of the Chairman from 2004 until his retirement in 2007. He joined New York Life in 1992 as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In 1995, he was promoted to Executive Vice President and was elected to the Board of Directors in 1996. In addition, he was President and a member of the board of New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation, served as ChairmanRecommendation of the Board of NYLIFE Insurance Company of Arizona, and served on the Board of Directors for Max New York Life, the company’s joint venture in India, Siam Commercial New York Life, the joint venture in Thailand and the company’s South Korea operation. Prior to joining New York Life, Mr. Sievert was a senior vice president for Royal Maccabees Life Insurance Company, a subsidiary of the Royal Insurance Group of London, England. Mr. Sievert currently serves as a director of CNO Financial Group, Inc.
|
Retired President of New York Life Insurance Company | Skills and Qualifications: Experience as an executive officer of a major U.S.-based life insurance company with international operations; life insurance business and insurance regulation; investments; risk management
|
Age: 68
Director since: 2010
Independent
|
Stanley B. Tulin
|
|
| Business Experience: Mr. Tulin joined AXA Equitable in 1996 as Senior Executive Vice President and CFO. He served on the AXA Group Executive Committee from 2000 through 2006. Following his retirement in 2006, Mr. Tulin consulted for AXA Financial, Inc. for five years. In his position at AXA, he gained extensive experience in acquisitions and divestitures, consolidated risk management and financial communications. In 1998, he was named Vice Chairman and a director of AXA Equitable, while remaining CFO of AXA Financial. Prior to that position, he was Executive Vice President and CFO of AXA Financial. Prior to joining AXA Equitable, Mr. Tulin served as Co-Chairman of Coopers & Lybrand’s Insurance Industry Practice group and was part of the Actuarial and Strategic Planning Group at Milliman & Robertson, Inc. for 17 years. Mr. Tulin is a fellow of the Society of Actuaries and a member of the American Academy of Actuaries.
|
Retired Vice Chairman and CFO of AXA Financial, Inc. and its principle insurance subsidiary, AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company | Skills and Qualifications: Experience as an executive officer of a major global financial services company; risk management, actuarial and mergers and acquisitions consulting experience; life insurance business; insurance regulation
|
Age: 66
Director since: 2012
Independent
|
A. Greig Woodring |
|
| Business Experience: Mr. Woodring was President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 1993 until December 1, 2015; at which time he relinquished the role of President. Prior to his position at RGA, Mr. Woodring headed the reinsurance business at General American Life Insurance Company from 1986 until the Company’s formation in December 1992. He also serves as a director of a number of Company subsidiaries.
|
Chief Executive Officer of the Company | Skills and Qualifications: RGA’s Chief Executive Officer since 1993; extensive knowledge of the Company’s business, operations and customers; extensive knowledge and relationships in the global financial services and life insurance business
|
Age: 64
Director since: 1993
Not Independent
|
DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS AND NOMINATION
Qualifications of Directors
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR the proposal to approve the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion.
Item 3 – Approval of Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Overview
On March 7, 2024, upon the recommendation of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee (the "Committee"), our Board of Directors approved the adoption of the Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP"), subject to shareholder approval in accordance with NYSE listing standards. If the shareholders of the Company do not approve the ESPP, the ESPP will not become effective.
We intend for the ESPP to offer a convenient means for employees of the Company (excluding our Section 16 officers) who might not otherwise purchase and hold our common stock to do so, and for the matching stock purchase feature as described below to provide a meaningful incentive to participate. We believe that the opportunity for these employees to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company through the purchase of shares of common stock and this matching feature will assist in attracting, retaining and rewarding employees, and strengthen the mutuality of interest between our employees and Company shareholders.
The ESPP is not intended to qualify as an "employee stock purchase plan" under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code").
Materials Terms of ESPP
The material features of the ESPP are summarized below. The following summary of the ESPP does not purport to be a complete description of all of the provisions of the ESPP, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the ESPP, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement.
Administration. The ESPP shall be administered by a committee appointed by our Board of Directors, which shall initially be the Human Capital and Compensation Committee of the Board (the "Administrator"). Any power of the Administrator may also be exercised by the Board. The Administrator will have broad authority pursuant to the terms of the ESPP, including full and exclusive discretionary authority to construe, interpret and apply the terms of the ESPP, and such other duties and responsibilities set forth in the ESPP. All determinations made upby the Administrator, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, will be final and binding upon all participants. In addition, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the Administrator may delegate its responsibilities under the ESPP to one or more officers or any subcommittee of eleven individuals,the Administrator. In addition, the Administrator may retain
any third-party broker-dealer, financial institution, clearing agent, transfer agent or other agent to perform such functions in connection with the ESPP as deemed appropriate by the Administrator.
Shares Available under ESPP. A total of 100,000 shares of common stock of the Company are initially authorized and reserved for issuance under the ESPP. The number of shares available under the ESPP are subject to adjustment as described below under "Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization." As of April 3, 2024, the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE was $193.60 per share.
Eligibility; Participation. All employees of the Company and any Designated Subsidiary (as defined below) are eligible to participate in the ESPP, except for any employee (i) who is an "officer" as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act, or (ii) who is not eligible to participate in the ESPP pursuant to the laws of a foreign jurisdiction. In addition, consultants and non-employee directors of the Company will not be eligible to participate in the ESPP. For purposes of the ESPP, a "Designated Subsidiary" means any subsidiary of the Company that has been designated by the Administrator from time to time in its sole discretion as eligible to participate in the Plan. As of March 1, 2024, approximately 3,000 employees of the Company would have been eligible to participate in the ESPP if the ESPP had been in operation on such date based on the Company's expectations for eligibility in the initial Offering Period (as defined below).
The Company, through its subsidiaries, employs people in various countries and intends to implement participation in the ESPP on a rolling basis, following analysis of relevant regulations in each applicable jurisdiction. In addition, the Plan provides that the Administrator may establish one or more sub-plans of the Plan to provide benefits to employees of Designated Subsidiaries located outside the United States in a manner that complies with local law.
Offering Periods. The ESPP will be implemented by offerings of purchase rights during offering periods ("Offering Periods") as determined by the Administrator. Offering Periods will commence at such times as determined by the Administrator, and will last six months unless a valuabledifferent term is determined by the Administrator. Under the ESPP, any Eligible Employee as of the commencement of any Offering Period who has elected to participate in the ESPP by following the enrollment procedures set forth in the ESPP will have the right to acquire shares of our common stock at the end of the Offering Period in accordance with the terms of the ESPP.
Contributions.To participate in the ESPP, a participant must authorize contributions, which will generally be collected through payroll deductions from the participant's base salary. Such payroll deductions will represent a fixed percentage of the base salary of such participant equal to 2% to 10% of base salary, as determined by the participant. Each participant who has elected to participate in the ESPP is automatically granted a purchase right on the first day of the Offering Period to purchase shares of common stock, which purchase right will be exercised as set forth below under "Purchase Date."
In addition, a participant is not permitted to make contributions to purchase shares of common stock pursuant to the ESPP in excess of $15,000 (or such other amount determined by the Administrator) in any calendar year.
Offering Period Mechanics. Any Eligible Employee may participate in the ESPP for any Offering Period by, at least 10 business days prior to the first day of the Offering Period (or such other period determined by the Administrator), submitting a properly completed subscription agreement authorizing contributions and/or completing such documentation and following such procedures as prescribed by the Administrator.
A participant may cease making contributions during any Offering Period by following the procedures set forth in the ESPP. In such event, the participant may not make any further contributions during such Offering Period. In addition, a participant may reduce (but not increase) such participant's contribution percentage at any time during any Offering Period, provided that only one such reduction may be made during any Offering Period. Except as set forth above, unless otherwise determined by the
Administrator, participants are not allowed to change the amount of their contributions during any Offering Period.
In addition, a participant may withdraw all, or less than all, of a participant's contributions during any Offering Period (provided, that a participant may not make more than one such withdrawal during any Offering Period), in which case all accumulated compensation deductions of such participant subject to such withdrawal request will be returned to such participant, without interest. In the event of any such withdrawal, such participant's purchase right for the Offering Period will be automatically terminated, and no further contributions may be made by such participant for the Offering Period in which such withdrawal occurs.
Unless a participant has ceased making contributions to the ESPP as set forth above, has withdrawn such participant's contributions in the ESPP as noted above, or is no longer an Eligible Employee, a participant in the ESPP in any Offering Period will continue to participate in the ESPP in future Offering Periods at the then existing contribution level of participant unless such participant has affirmatively changed such contribution level.
Purchase Date.Unless a participant has withdrawn all of such participant's contributions in the ESPP as noted above during an Offering Period or is no longer an Eligible Employee, a participant will generally acquire shares of common stock on the last trading day of the Offering Period (the "Purchase Date"). In such event, on the Purchase Date, (i) contributions for each participant will be used to purchase whole shares of the Company's common stock at a purchase price equal to the closing trading price of our common stock on the Purchase Date, and (ii) the Company will issue the Matching Common Stock to participant in connection therewith (as defined and described below).
Matching Common Stock.On any Purchase Date on which a participant purchases shares of common stock as set forth above, the Company will issue to such participant shares of common stock (the "Matching Common Stock") which will equal 25% (or such lower percentage, as may be determined by the Administrator) of the shares purchased by participant on such Purchase Date.The Matching Common Stock will be subject to a risk of forfeiture, andunless otherwise determined by the Administrator, in the event a participant ceases to be an employee of the Company for any reason prior to the end of the restricted period with respect to such Matching Common Stock (which, unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, will be the first anniversary of the Purchase Date upon which the Matching Common Stock was issued), the Matching Common Stock on such Purchase Date shall be forfeited without any consideration.
Termination of Employment.At such time that the employment of any participant terminates or such individual otherwise ceases to be an Eligible Employee, for any reason, such participant will be deemed to have elected to immediately withdraw from the ESPP and the contributions credited to such participant's notional account under the ESPP but not yet used to purchase shares of Common Stock under the Plan will be returned to such participant.
Transferability. Rights to purchase shares of our common stock under the ESPP, and contributions in a participant's account, may not be transferred by a participant and may be exercised only by the participant, subject to certain exceptions in connection with the death of a participant as provided under the terms of the ESPP.
Rights as a Shareholder; Dividends on Matching Common Stock.A participant will have the rights and privileges of a shareholder of the Company when, but not until, shares have been issued and delivered to such participant following exercise of such participant's option on the Purchase Date.In addition, in the event a dividend by the Company is paid in respect of any Matching Common Stock priorto the first anniversary of the Purchase Date upon which such Matching Common Stock was issued, then such dividends will not bepaid on such Matching Common Stock unless and until the participant continues employment through such first anniversary.
Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization.In the event of any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Common Stock, other securities, or other property, but excluding normal cash dividends), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or exchange of Common Stock or other securities of the Company, orother change in the corporate structure of the Company affecting the Common Stock, the Administrator, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the ESPP, shall, in any such manner as it deems equitable, appropriately adjust the number and class of shares available under the ESPP and the applicable purchase price of such shares.
Change in Control.In the event of any sale of all or substantially all of the assets, merger or similar transaction involving the Company, except as provided below, any outstanding purchase rights will be assumed or an equivalent option may be substituted by the successor.Alternatively, in such event, if the successor entity refuses to assume or substitute for such purchase rights, or if so determined by the Administrator, the Administrator may shorten the Offering Period so that the last day of such shortened Offering Period will occur prior to the date of the completion of such transaction in accordance with the terms of the ESPP.
Effective Date.The ESPP will be effective on May 22, 2024, provided that the ESPP has been approved by our shareholders on such date.
Amendment and Termination.Our board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate the ESPP in any respect at any time, provided that the ESPP may not be amended without approval of our shareholders if such approval is necessary to comply with any applicable laws (including the rules of the NYSE) for which or with which the Administrator deems it necessary or desirable to comply.
New Plan Benefits
No purchases have been made at this time under the ESPP as the result of the fact that the ESPP is not yet in effect and is subject to shareholder approval.Participation in the ESPP is voluntary, and benefits under the ESPP will depend on employees' elections to participate and the fair market value of our common stock at various future dates.Accordingly, future benefits or amounts that will be received under the ESPP by employees of the Company are not currently determinable.In addition, as noted above, directors and Section 16 officers of the Company will not be eligible to participate in the ESPP.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following discussion is a brief summary of certain U.S. federal income tax aspects associated with the issuance of shares of common stock (including Matching Common Stock) under the ESPP based upon the U.S. federal income tax laws in effect on the date hereof. This summary is provided only for general information and is not intended to be exhaustive. The exact U.S. federal income tax consequences to any participant will depend upon his or her particular circumstances and other factors. Participants may also be subject to certain other U.S. federal, state or local, or non-U.S. taxes, which are not described herein. This summarized tax information is not tax advice, and participants in the ESPP are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors with respect to such other tax considerations or particular U.S. federal income tax implications of shares acquired under the ESPP.As noted above, the ESPP is not intended to qualify as an "employee stock purchase plan" under Section 423 of the Code (a "Section 423 Plan"). Accordingly, certain tax benefits available to participants in a Section 423 Plan will not be available under the ESPP.
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a participant generally will not recognize taxable income at the beginning of an Offering Period in respect of the grant of the right to purchase and acquire shares under the ESPP, nor will the Company be entitled to any deduction at that time. The amount of a Participant's payroll deductions during an Offering Period will be subject to U.S. federal income tax
withholding at the time the payroll deductions are made. At the end of the Offering Period, a participant generally will not recognize taxable income upon the purchase of shares under the ESPP at their fair market value, nor upon any issuance of Matching Common Stock under the ESPP at that time, and instead will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the Matching Common Stock when the risk of forfeiture with respect to the Matching Common Stock lapses at the end of the applicable restricted period as described above under "Matching Common Stock" (unless the participant elects to be taxed at the time of the issuance of the Matching Common Stock pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code). The Company generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction at the time the participant recognizes income in respect of the Matching Common Stock.
Upon the subsequent sale or other disposition of any shares acquired under the ESPP, the participant generally will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized by the participant on such disposition and the participant's adjusted tax basis in such shares. A participant's adjusted tax basis in shares acquired under the ESPP generally will be the purchase price paid for any purchased shares, or the amount of ordinary income recognized in connection with the issuance of Matching Common Stock.A capital gain or loss will be long-term if at the time of the disposition, the participant has held the shares for more than one year. Unless the participant made an election under Section 83(b) of the Code, the restricted period applicable to any issuance of Matching Common Stock following such issuance is not taken into account for purposes of determining whether the participant has held those shares for more than one year. Long-term capital gain recognized by a participant generally is taxed at preferential rates. The deductibility of capital losses by a participant is subject to limitations.
Vote Required
The vote required to approve this Item 3 is a majority of the shares of common stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this matter, which approval will also satisfy the requirement under NYSE rules that the proposal be approved by a majority of the votes cast.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors has approved the ESPP and recommends that shareholders vote FOR the proposal.
Item 4 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor
We are asking shareholders to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP and its related entities (collectively, "Deloitte") as the Company's independent registered public accountant for the current year. The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed Deloitte subject to shareholder ratification.
Representatives of Deloitte will attend the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and they will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
As outlined in the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit RGA's financial statements. The Audit Committee annually evaluates the performance of the Company's independent auditor, including the senior audit engagement team, and determines whether to reengage the current auditors or consider other audit firms. Deloitte has served as the independent auditor of the Company since 2000.
The Audit Committee and the Board believe it is in the best interests of RGA and its shareholders to continue to retain Deloitte as RGA's independent registered public accounting firm. Its long-term
knowledge of the Company and its subsidiaries, combined with its insurance industry expertise, has enabled it to carry out its audits of the Company's financial statements with effectiveness and efficiency.
In considering Deloitte's appointment, the Audit Committee reviewed the firm's qualifications and competencies, including the following factors:
•Deloitte's status as a registered public accounting firm with the PCAOB, as required by Sarbanes-Oxley and the Rules of the PCAOB;
•Deloitte's independence and its processes for maintaining its independence;
•the results of the independent review of the firm's quality control system;
•the key members of the engagement team for the audit of the Company's financial statements;
•Deloitte's approach to resolving significant accounting and auditing matters including consultation with the firm's national office; and
•Deloitte's reputation for integrity and competence in the fields of accounting and auditing.
The Audit Committee ensures the mandatory five-year rotation of the audit engagement team partner as required by SEC rules. The lead engagement partner was appointed beginning with the fiscal year 2023 audit.
The Audit Committee also approves Deloitte's audit and permissible non-audit services in advance pursuant to a Pre-Approval Policy. Deloitte submits to the Audit Committee detailed schedules with all of the proposed permitted services within each category, together with estimated fees. The Audit Committee also reviews a schedule of audit-related, tax and other permitted non-audit services that the Company may engage the independent auditor to perform and an estimated amount of fees for each of those services.
Consistent with the Pre-Approval Policy, all audit related services, tax services and other services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee concluded that the provision of such services by Deloitte was compatible with the maintenance of that firm's independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.
The aggregate fees billed to us for the years ending December 31, 2023 and 2022 by Deloitte are set forth below.
| | | | | | | | |
| Auditor Fees | | |
| Fee | Fiscal Year |
| 2023 | 2022 |
Audit Fees1 | $15,721,639 | $14,195,133 |
Audit Related Fees2 | 723,581 | 716,181 |
| Total Audit and Audit-related Fees | $16,445,220 | $14,911,314 |
Tax Fees3 | 233,060 | 149,562 |
| Other | — | — |
| Total Fees | $16,678,280 | $15,060,876 |
1. Includes fees for the audit of our Company's and its subsidiaries' annual financial statements, reviews of our quarterly financial statements and Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 attestation. Approximately $2.5 million and $1.8 million of the total 2023 and 2022 Audit Fees were related to the Company's implementation of LDTI accounting changes, respectively.
2. Includes fees for services rendered by Deloitte for matters such as assistance with internal control reporting requirements, certain accounting consultations on potential acquisition, reinsurance transactions, and services associated with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and securities offerings.
3. Includes fees for tax services rendered by Deloitte such as consultation related to tax planning and compliance.
Vote Required
The vote required to approve this Item 4 is a majority of the common stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this matter.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors has approved the proposal regarding the appointment of Deloitte and recommends that shareholders vote FOR the proposal.
Vote Requirements
Each share of common stock outstanding at the close of business on the record date is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the other proposals to be voted on. Under Missouri corporate law, if a quorum is present, the votes necessary to approve the proposals are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| Voting Matters |
| Item | Proposal | Vote Required to Adopt the Proposal |
| 1. | Election of Directors | The vote required to elect each director is the affirmative votes of the holders of a majority of the common stock entitled to vote thereon which are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. |
| 2. | Shareholders' Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation | The vote required to pass this proposal is the affirmative votes of the holders of a majority of the common stock entitled to vote thereon which are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. |
| 3. | Approve the RGA Employee Stock Purchase Plan | The vote required to pass this proposal is the affirmative votes of the holders of a majority of the common stock entitled to vote thereon which are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. |
| 4. | Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditor | The vote required to pass this proposal is the affirmative votes of the holders of a majority of the common stock entitled to vote thereon which are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. |
Under Missouri corporate law, the approval of any action taken at the Annual Meeting requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to vote on any such action which are present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will be counted in connection with determining the number of shares represented at the Annual Meeting for quorum purposes. In addition, any abstentions with respect to any of the above items will have the same effect as if the shares represented thereby, as applicable, were voted against any nominee or nominees with respect to Item 1, and against the proposals with respect to Items 2, 3 and 4.
Broker non-votes, while counted for general quorum purposes, will have no effect on the voting results for any non-discretionary matter.As such, if a broker indicates on the proxy that it does not have discretionary authority as to certain shares to vote on a particular matter, those shares will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to that matter and thus will have no effect on the outcome of the vote with regard to such matters.The election of directors (Item 1), the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers (Item 2), and the proposal to approve the ESPP (Item 3) are considered non-discretionary items, and as such brokers cannot vote uninstructed shares on your behalf in these matters. For your vote to be counted on these matters, you must submit your voting instruction form to your broker. Conversely, the ratification of the independent auditor (Item 4) is a discretionary item such that, if your shares are held through a broker, that person will have discretion to vote your shares on that matter if you fail to provide instructions.For
additional information, see "Other Matters - Question and Answers about the Annual Meetings" under "What is a Broker Non-Vote?".
We know of no other matters to come before the meeting. As set forth in "Other Matters," our organizational documents require that advance notice be provided of any proposal intended to be presented at the Annual Meeting. The deadline for this notice has passed, and we did not receive any such notice. As such, if any other matters properly come before the meeting, the proxies solicited hereby will be voted on such matters in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting such proxies. Voting results will be disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.
Board of Directors and Corporate Governance
Board of Directors
Board Composition
Each of the nominees standing for election has a core set of skills, talents and attributes that make them appropriate forvaluable members of our Company’s Board as a whole.Company's Board. When searching for new Board candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the evolving needs of the Company’sCompany's global business and searches for Board candidates thatwho fill any current or anticipated future needs or gaps in skills, experience and experience. As determined by ouroverall Board and thecomposition.
The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board has determined that all of our directors and director candidatesnominees should possess the following qualifications:
| DIRECTOR QUALIFICATION CRITERIA | | | | |
| Director Qualifications | |
| Director Qualification | Description |
| |
Director Qualification | Description |
Financial Literacy | Such person should be "financially literate" as such qualification is interpreted by the Board in its business judgment. |
Leadership
Experience
| Such person should possess significant leadership experience, such as experience in business, finance/accounting, law, education or government, and shall possess qualities reflecting a proven record of accomplishment and ability to work with others. |
Commitment to
Our Values
| Such person shallDirectors and candidates should be committed to promoting ourthe Company's financial success and preserving and enhancing our business and ethical reputation, as embodied in our codes of conduct and ethics. |
AbsenceDiversity
| Directors and candidates should reflect a diversity of Conflicting
Commitments
viewpoints, background, work and other experiences (including military service), and other demographics, such as race, gender identity, ethnicity, sexual orientation, culture and nationality. |
| Financial Literacy | Such personDirectors and candidates should be "financially literate" as such qualification is interpreted by the Board in its business judgment. |
| Independence | Directors and candidates should not have any conflicts of interest or other commitments that would conflict withprevent such director from fulfilling the time requirement commitmentsobligations of a director. Mr. Cheng, as our President and Chief Executive Officer, is not independent. |
Knowledge and
Experience | Directors and candidates should possess knowledge and experience that will complement that of other directors and promote the creation of shareholder value. |
Leadership
Experience | Directors and candidates should possess significant leadership experience, such as experience in business, finance/accounting, financial services regulation, education or government, and shall possess qualities reflecting a proven record of accomplishment and ability to work with others. |
| Reputation and
Integrity
| Such person shallDirectors and candidates should be of high repute and recognized integrity and not have been convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses). Such person shall not have been found in a civil proceeding to have violated any federal or state securities or commodities law and shall not be subject to any court or regulatory order or decree limiting his or her business activity, including in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity. |
Knowledge and
Experience
| Such person should possess knowledge and experience that will complement that of other directors and promote the creation of shareholder value. |
| Other Factors | Such person shallDirectors and candidates should have such other qualifying and desirable characteristics considered appropriate for membership onas identified by the Board, including an understanding of marketingNominating and finance, sound business judgment, significant experience and accomplishments and educational background.Governance Committee from time to time. |
Other areas of expertise or experience are desirable given our Company’sCompany's global reinsurance business and operations, and the current make-up of the Board, such as expertise or experience in:including: life insurance, actuarial science, financial services, information technology, cybersecurity, data privacy and security, international markets, operations, capital markets, investments, banking, risk management, public company servicehuman capital management and actuarial science. The process undertaken bysustainability.
Changes in Directors
Since the Nominating2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Board's composition has changed as follows:
On October 1, 2023, Michele Bang was appointed as a member of the Board. Ms. Bang is the former Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Eastspring Investments, the Asia asset management arm of Prudential plc. During her time with Prudential she served as the executive team member that drove digital innovation and Governance Committee in recommending qualifiedtechnology integration throughout the firm.
Anna Manning retired as the Company's Chief Executive Officer and as a director candidateson December 31, 2023.
On April 1, 2024, Alison Rand was appointed as a member of the Board. Ms. Rand is described under "Shareholder Nominations."the former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Primerica, Inc. While at Primerica she managed investor relations, strategic planning, capital management, product development and financial reporting and analysis.
Director Skills Matrix
All of our directors bring significant executive leadership, management and industry expertise derived from their careers and professions. When considering whether our current directors hadhave the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board of Directors to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the Company’sCompany's business and structure, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board of Directors focused primarilyfocus on the information discussed in eachdiversity of experience of the director's individualdirectors, illustrated in the director biographies described above.
Shareholder Nominationsand the following skills matrix.
As described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider shareholder nominations for directors who meet the notification, timeliness, consent and
6
information requirements of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Director Skills Matrix |
| Director Qualifications, Attributes and Skills | Albo | Bang | Cheng | Gauthier | Guinn | McNeilage | Nichols |
O'Hearn (Chair) | Rand |
Thomas
| Tran | Van Wyk |
Corporate Governance & Public Company Board.Experience in public company corporate governance issues, policies and practices, shareholder relations, financial reporting and compliance, strategic planning and risk oversight. | ● | | ● | ● | ● | | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Financial Literacy. Knowledge of finance or financial reporting, complex financial management, capital allocation, experience with debt/capital market transactions and mergers and acquisitions. | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Government/Regulatory. Experience in government and regulatory affairs, and regulated industries, including as part of a business and/or through positions with government organizations or regulatory bodies. | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Human Capital Management. Talent acquisition, development, engagement and retention; wellness and benefits; diversity, equity and inclusion; director, CEO and senior executive succession planning. | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Industry Knowledge.Experience in the Company's businesses and industries including traditional individual and group life and health, disability and critical illness reinsurance and financial services, such as longevity reinsurance, asset-intensive reinsurance, financial reinsurance and stable value products. | ● | ● | ● | | ● | | ● | ● | ● | | ● | |
International. Experience doing business internationally or focused on international issues and operations and exposure to markets, environments, economic conditions and cultures outside the U.S. associated with a global workforce and international business activities. | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | | ● | | | ● | ● |
Investments. Experience in investment policy and strategy, global asset/liability management, research and strategy development, portfolio construction, and risk management. | | ● | | ● | ● | ● | | | | ● | ● | |
Risk Assessment and Management.Experience identifying and prioritizing a spectrum of risks and managing and overseeing complex risk management matters. | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Senior Leadership Experience. Significant leadership experience, including serving as a CEO, senior executive, division president or functional leader within a complex corporate entity. | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Sustainability.Knowledge of and experience with environmental, social and governance issues, trends, disclosures and practices, corporate citizenship and behavior, sustainable business model and strategy. | ● | ● | | ● | | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |
Technology and Cybersecurity.Knowledge of and experience with implementing technology strategies, understanding of emerging technologies and cybersecurity risks, issues and protections; long-term systems planning and strategy. | | | | | | ● | | | ● | ● | | ● |
Director Nominees
The Committee makes no distinctions in evaluating nominees for positions on the Board based on whether or notCompany recommends a nominee is recommended by a shareholder, provided that the procedures with respect to nominations referred to above are followed. Potential candidates for nomination as director candidates must provide written information about their qualifications and participate in interviews conducted by individual Board members, including the chairs of the Audit or Nominating and Governance Committees. Candidates are evaluated using the criteria adopted by the Board to determine their qualifications based on the information supplied by the candidates and information obtained from other sources. The Nominating and Governance Committee will recommend candidates for election as director to the Board for approval, only if the Committee determines, in its judgment, that they have the specific minimum qualifications described above.
In order for a shareholder to nominate a candidate for director under our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, timely notice of the nomination must be given to us in advance of the meeting. Ordinarily, such notice must be given not less than 60 nor more than 90 days before the meeting (but if we give less than 70 days notice of the meeting or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting, then the shareholder must give such notice within 10 days after notice of the meeting is mailed or other public disclosure of the meeting is made, whichever occurs first).
The shareholder filing the notice of nomination must describe various matters as specified in our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, including such information as name, address, occupation andvote FOR all direct and indirect ownership interests, derivative interests, short interests, other economic incentives and rights to vote any shares of any security of the Company and other material interests in the Company. Shareholders nominating directors must disclose the same information about a proposed director nominee that would be required if the director nominee were submitting a proposal; any other information that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement in a contested election pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; any material relationships between the shareholder proponent and the director nominees; and, at the Company’s request, any other information that would enable the Board to determine a nominee’s eligibility to serve as a director, including information relating to the proposed nominee’s independence or lack thereof.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee reviews director compensation periodically and recommends changes to the Board, when it deems appropriate, based on market information provided to the Committee by Steven Hall & Partners, an independent compensation consultant. The Committee considers various factors, including the responsibilities of directors generally, the responsibilities of Board and committee chairs and Company performance. Information regarding the retention of Steven Hall & Partners can be found under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Process — Compensation Consultant." The Board reviews the recommendations of the Compensation Committee and determines the form and amount of director compensation. Directors who also serve as employees of the Company do not receive payment for services as a director.
2015 Director Compensation
During 2015, Mr. Woodring was the sole director employed by the Company, and the directors who are not employees of our Company or any subsidiary ("non-employee directors") consisted of Messrs. Bartlett, Boot, Danahy, Eason, Henderson, Sievert and Tulin and Mses. Detrick and Phillips. During 2015, compensation to our non-employee directors consisted of the following elements:
nominees for election to the Board. | 2015 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION STRUCTURE | | | | |
| Pina Albo | | |
Annual Retainer | |
Chairman of the Board | $180,000 |
All other independent directors | $100,000 |
Committee Chair Additional Retainer | |
Audit Committee Chair | $25,000 |
Compensation Committee Chair | $15,000 |
Finance, Investment and Risk Management Committee Chair | $15,000 |
Nominating | Business Experience: Ms. Albo is the Chief Executive Officer of Hamilton Insurance Group ("Hamilton"), a Bermuda-based holding company for Hamilton Re, a global specialty insurer and Governance Committee Chair
| $15,000 |
Annual Stock Grants1
| |
Chairman of the Board | $240,000 |
All other independent directors | $140,000 |
1Number of shares issued is based upon the fair market value of the stock on the date of the grant.
We also reimburse directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending and participating in Board and Committee meetings and director education programs. Mr. Bartlett also serves as a director of our Australian holding and operating companies, and receives an annual retainer and superannuation pension benefits for those services. Beginning in 2016, members of a Board sub-group regarding acquisitions will receive an additional cash annual retainer of $10,000 each.
| 2015 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION |
| | | | |
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash1 | Stock Awards2 | All Other Compensation3 | Total |
| William J. Bartlett | $125,000 | $140,002 | $84,8844 | $349,886 |
| Arnoud W.A. Boot | $100,000 | $140,002 | $4,792 | $244,794 |
| John F. Danahy | $115,000 | $140,002 | --- | $255,002 |
| Christine R. Detrick | $100,000 | $140,002 | $6,416 | $246,418 |
| J. Cliff Eason | $180,000 | $240,029 | --- | $420,029 |
| Alan C. Henderson | $115,000 | $140,002 | $9,228 | $264,230 |
| Joyce A. Phillips | $100,000 | $140,002 | --- | $240,002 |
| Fred J. Sievert | $115,000 | $140,002 | --- | $255,002 |
| Stanley B. Tulin | $66,0005 | $140,002 | $7,078 | $213,080 |
| |
1. | This column reflects the retainerproperty and fees earnedcasualty reinsurer. Prior to joining Hamilton, she spent 25 years at Munich Re, starting as a claims expert and holding increasingly senior positions that culminated in 2015 for Boardroles as President, Reinsurance Division, Munich Re America and committee service. The 2015 retainer was paid in January 2015.
|
| |
2. | This column reflects the award of 1,562 shares (2,678 shares in the case of Mr. Eason) of common stock on February 19, 2015, at a closing market price of $89.63. The stock was issued as part of the directors’ annual compensation. Mr. Eason elected to defer his stock awards under the Flexible Stock Plan for Directors. |
| |
3. | This column includes reimbursements to the director for spousal travel expenses incurred in connection with attending the October 2015 meetinglater Member of the Board of Directors which is usually heldExecutive Management. She began her career as a lawyer after having earned law degrees in oneboth Canada and France. Ms. Albo currently serves as Chair of the Company’s global offices outsideboard of directors for the United States. Under U.S. tax laws,Association of Bermuda Insurers and Reinsurers. |
| Chief Executive Officer of Hamilton Insurance Group | Age: 61 Director since: 2019 Independent |
| Michele Bang | |
| Business Experience: Ms. Bang was the amountDeputy Chief Executive Officer of such reimbursementEastspring Investments, the Asia asset management arm of Prudential plc. During her time with Prudential, she concurrently served as executive team member that drove digital innovation and technology integration throughout the firm. Prior to her role with Prudential, Ms. Bang held senior leadership roles and board seats in Asia for spousal travel must be included onDeutsche Asset Management (now DWS Group). She has been active in new economy innovation as an investor, competition judge, and advisor to entrepreneurs in the Form 1099-MISC that is issued annually by the Company to each director. Directors are responsible for paying any taxes they incur becausehealth, education, and fintech space. She has a Bachelor of the reimbursement for spousal travel expenses.Arts degree from Cornell University. |
| Retired Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Eastspring Investments | Age: 59 Director since: 2023 Independent |
| | | | | |
| Tony Cheng | |
| Business Experience: Mr. Cheng is President and Chief Executive Officer of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated. He has been Chief Executive Officer since January 1, 2024 and was named President in January 2023. Prior to this appointment Mr. Cheng was Executive Vice President, Head of EMEA, Asia, and Australia for RGA Reinsurance Company, providing executive oversight for the Company's EMEA, Asia and Australia operations. Mr. Cheng joined RGA in 1997 as Chief Actuary of Malaysian Life Reinsurance Group Berhad. In 2004, he was named Chief Executive Officer of the Hong Kong office, responsible for all business activity in Hong Kong and Southeast Asia, and in 2011, he was named Senior Vice President, Asia. Mr. Cheng received a Bachelor of Economics (B.Ec.) degree from Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia and an M.B.A. from Washington University in St. Louis's John M. Olin School of Business. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Actuaries of Australia (FIAA). An active participant and past President of the Actuarial Society of Hong Kong, he has also served as a council member for the Society and as a past Chair of its Experience and Life Committees. |
4.President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company | Represents compensation for services as a director of our Australian holding and operating companies. Australian dollars converted to U.S. dollars using an annualized currency exchange rate.Age: 50 Director since: 2023 Not independent |
| |
5. | Mr. Tulin is reimbursed for certain personal travel expenses he incurs to attend Board and Committee meetings. Those expenses exceed the amount reimbursable under the Company’s travel expense reimbursement policy for directors. Mr. Tulin is reimbursed for the travel expenses in lieu of receiving the annual cash retainer. The net expense to the Company is approximately equal to the amount Mr. Tulin would have received if he was paid the annual retainer and reimbursed for travel as permitted in the travel expense reimbursement policy. |
Director Stock Retention Policy
Our director stock retention policy provides that, subject to certain exceptions, a non-employee member of the Board of Directors may not sell any shares of the Company’s common stock which he or she received as compensation for service on the Board of Directors at any time during his or her service as a director. Effective February 2016, our director stock retention policy requires directors to hold stock with a value equal to five times their annual cash retainer.
Directors’ Phantom (Deferred) Shares
Non-employee directors may elect to receive phantom shares by deferring all or a portion of their annual compensation (including the stock portion). A phantom share is a hypothetical share of our common stock based upon the fair market value of the common stock at the time of the grant. Phantom shares granted prior to January 1, 2016 are not distributed until the director ceases to serve on the Board by reason of retirement as a director, at which time we will issue cash or shares of common stock in an amount equal to the value of the phantom shares. Effective, January 1, 2016, directors can elect to receive distribution of deferred shares at retirement or five or seven years after a post-deferral election. Distributions can be either via shares or cash and can be paid as a single payment or in five substantially similar annual installments.
Because phantom shares can be distributed in cash instead of stock, they are not included as shares beneficially owned by the directors under the beneficial ownership table (page 54). Several directors have elected to participate in the deferral option and the following table illustrates their accumulated phantom share balance as of December 31, 2015:
| PHANTOM OR DEFERRED SHARE OWNERSHIP | | | | |
| John J. Gauthier | |
| Business Experience:Mr. Gauthier was the Chief Investment Officer of Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG, a global provider of insurance and reinsurance solutions, from 2008 to 2018. Mr. Gauthier also served as President of Allied World Financial Services Company, Inc. from 2012 until his retirement in 2018. Before joining Allied, Mr. Gauthier was a Managing Director with Goldman Sachs Asset Management, a division of Goldman Sachs & Co. Prior to Goldman Sachs, he was with Conning Asset Management and General Reinsurance/New England Asset Management and The Travelers. Mr. Gauthier holds a B.S. in computer information systems from Quinnipiac University and an M.B.A. in finance from The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. He is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA). He is Principal at JJG Advisory, LLC, a consulting business, and at Talcott Capital Partners, LLC, an investor advisory business. He serves on the board of directors of The Hartford Funds Group, Hamilton Insurance Group, LTD. and Middlesex Health System, Inc. |
| Retired CIO of Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG and Retired President of Allied World Financial Services Company, Inc. | Age: 62 Director since: 2018 Independent |
NamePatricia L. Guinn | | Phantom or Deferred Shares
| Business Experience: Ms. Guinn was the Managing Director of Risk and Financial Services and a member of the executive leadership team at Towers Watson from 2010 until her retirement in 2015. Previously, she served as a Member of the Board and the Managing Director of Risk and Financial Services at Towers Watson's predecessor company, Towers Perrin. Overall, she has over 40 years of experience in the insurance industry. Ms. Guinn is a member of the board of directors of AssetMark Financial Holdings, Inc. and Constellation Insurance Holdings; she chairs the audit committee of each and is a member of the compensation committee of AssetMark. She is an Association Member of BUPA and advisory board member of EOS Ventura Partners. She previously served on the board of Allied World Assurance Company Holdings AG. Additionally, Ms. Guinn is a fellow of the Society of Actuaries, a member of the American Academy of Actuaries and a Chartered Enterprise Risk Analyst. |
William J. BartlettRetired Managing Director of Risk and Financial Services at Towers Watson | 5,631Age: 69 Director since: 2016 Independent |
J. Cliff EasonHazel M. McNeilage | | 27,561
| Business Experience: Ms. McNeilage was the Regional Managing Director, EMEA, for Northern Trust Corporation's Asset Management division from 2015 to 2018 and a Director of Northern Trust Global Investment Ltd. Prior to joining Northern Trust, Ms. McNeilage held a variety of roles with Northill Capital Partners from 2012 to 2015, including interim CEO for one of Northill's affiliates. Prior to that, she spent two years as Head of Funds Management for QIC, a major sovereign wealth fund based in Australia. From 2001 to 2009 Ms. McNeilage was with Principal Global Investors, during which she served in leadership positions around the world and was a member of several boards. Prior to Principal, Ms. McNeilage spent more than a decade with Towers Perrin (now Willis Towers Watson), including a three-year term on its board of directors. Ms. McNeilage received a Bachelor of Science from the University of Lancaster, England, with majors in Mathematics, Economics, and Operations Research. She is a Fellow of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries, a Fellow of the Institute of Actuaries of Australia, and a Board Leadership Fellow of the National Association of Corporate Directors (U.S.). Ms. McNeilage holds certificates in cybersecurity from both Carnegie Mellon University and Harvard University. Ms. McNeilage also serves on the Board of Directors of Everest Group, Ltd. (NYSE: EG). |
Alan C. HendersonRetired Regional Managing Director, EMEA of Northern Trust Asset Management | 1,086Age: 67 Director since: 2018 Independent |
| |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
| | | | | |
| George Nichols III | |
| Business Experience:Mr. Nichols currently serves as the President and CEO for the American College of Financial Services, the nation's largest nonprofit educational institution devoted to financial services. Previously, he spent 17 years at New York Life, holding principal roles in sales, profit and loss, strategic initiatives and public policy. Mr. Nichols served as executive vice president of Governmental Affairs and was named to the Executive Management Committee. Prior to joining New York Life, Mr. Nichols was the first Black insurance commissioner for the Commonwealth of Kentucky, leading the regulation of the Commonwealth's $10 billion insurance industry. Mr. Nichols sits on the Boards of Republic Bancorp, Inc. and OneAmerica Financial. He currently serves as Chair of the Board of Trustees for City Year. |
| President and Chief Executive Officer, The American College of Financial Services | Age: 63 Director since: 2022 Independent |
| | | | | |
| Stephen O'Hearn (Chair) | |
| | Business Experience: Mr. O'Hearn was employed by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) for 38 years. He held a variety of leadership positions including serving as the Global Insurance Leader from 2015 to 2020, during which time he also served on PwC's financial services leadership team and the firm's extended global leadership team. A trained accountant, Mr. O'Hearn has 26 years of experience as an audit partner, serving a variety of clients in the financial services industry, including many of the world's leading insurers, while resident in Milwaukee, Tokyo, New York, Zurich and Munich, until his retirement from PwC in 2020. Mr. O'Hearn attended The University of Notre Dame, graduating summa cum laude in 1982. He is a Certified Public Accountant in the U.S. He serves on the Law, Regulation & Resilience Policies Working Group of the Insurance Development Forum, which is a collaboration between the insurance industry and various governmental organizations, including the United Nations and World Bank, aimed at improving resilience and narrowing the protection gap. Mr. O'Hearn is also Governor and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Junior Achievement Worldwide. |
| Retired Global Leader, Insurance Practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers | Age: 63 Director since: 2020 Independent |
| Alison Rand | |
| Business Experience: Ms. Rand is the retired Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Primerica, Inc. (NYSE: PRI). She joined Primerica in 1995 and held various roles with increasing responsibility and scope in finance, accounting and treasury functions, including tax, financial reporting and analysis, capital management, corporate strategy, risk management and investor relations. Prior to joining Primerica, Ms. Rand worked in the Audit department of KPMG LLP. She received a Bachelor of Science in accounting from the University of Florida. Ms. Rand serves on the board of directors of Regions Financial Corporation (NYSE: RF), and is a member of the Audit and Technology Committees. She previously served on the board of directors of Warburg Pincus Capital Corporation I-A (NYSE: WPCA). Ms. Rand is also involved in several nonprofit and advisory boards. |
| Retired Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Primerica, Inc. | Age: 56 Director since: 2024 Independent |
| | | | | |
| Shundrawn Thomas | |
| Business Experience: Mr. Thomas is the founder and managing partner of The Copia Group, LLC, a private investment firm. Until June 1, 2022, he was President of Northern Trust Asset Management (NTAM), a leading global investment manager, and was a member of the executive management group of Northern Trust Corporation, collaborating with the CEO, board, and executive team to develop and execute corporate strategy and governance. Mr. Thomas holds a bachelor's degree in accounting from Florida A&M University, where he graduated magna cum laude and an MBA from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, with concentrations in accounting and finance. |
| Founder and Managing Partner, The Copia Group, LLC | Age: 50 Director since: 2021 Independent |
| Khanh T. Tran | |
| Business Experience:Mr. Tran was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Aviation Capital Group LLC, a global commercial aviation leasing company until his retirement in 2020. Previously, he spent 25 years with the life insurance and annuity company Pacific Life, during which time he served in a number of senior executive roles, including President, Chief Investment Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. Tran graduated from Whittier College in Whittier, California, with a Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) in economics and political science. He also has an M.B.A. with a focus on finance and marketing from UCLA Anderson School of Management. Mr. Tran has served on several corporate boards, including CIT Group, Inc., Aviation Capital Group LLC, Pacific Life Insurance Company, and Scottish Re. He is currently a trustee and Chair of the Finance Committee for the Semester at Sea. Mr. Tran is a champion of leadership, diversity, equity, and inclusion: in 2019, he founded and is currently chairman emeritus of the Orange County, California chapter of Ascend Leadership, the largest Pan-Asian professional membership organization in North America, dedicated to driving workplace and societal impact by developing, elevating and increasing Pan-Asian executive leaders. |
| Retired President and Chief Executive Officer of Aviation Capital Group LLC | Age: 67 Director since: 2022 Independent |
| Steven C. Van Wyk | |
| Business Experience: Mr. Van Wyk is the Group Chief Information Officer of HSBC Bank and is based in London. Prior to joining HSBC in December 2020, Mr. Van Wyk was the Chief Information Officer and Head of Technology & Innovation at PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., where he was responsible for all aspects of technology and innovation across the bank. Prior to his roles at PNC, Mr. Van Wyk served as CIO of ING Insurance Americas from 2006 to 2007 before becoming CIO/COO of ING Bank and ING Group Amsterdam from 2008 to 2013. From 1996 to 2006, Mr. Van Wyk served in various roles, including Vice President - Strategic Information Technology, Managing Director, CIO and COO of the Individual Investor Group of Morgan Stanley. Mr. Van Wyk holds a B.A. in Business Management and Accounting from Central University of Iowa and is a Certified Public Accountant (CPA), Certified Internal Auditor (CIA) and a Series 27 Financial/Operations Principal. |
| Group Chief Information Officer of HSBC Bank PLC | Age: 65 Director since: 2019 Independent |
Board Leadership and Effectiveness
We believe that the diverse composition, leadership experiences and attributes of our Board enhance its effectiveness. Our directors reflect a values-based company. Our values guidediverse set of experiences and skills that are relevant to our behavior at every levelindustry and apply across the Company on a global basis. We expect all directors, officers and employees to conductlong-term business in compliance with the guidelines described below and we survey compliance with these policies on an annual basis.
Governance Guidelines and Charters
We have adopted a Principles of Ethical Business Conduct (the "Principles"), a Directors’ Code of Conduct (the "Directors’ Code"), and a Financial Management Code of Professional Conduct (the "Financial Management Code"). The Principles apply to all employees and officersstrategy. 92% of the Companymembers of our Board are independent, 42% are female and its subsidiaries. The Directors’ Code applies to directors42% are racially or ethnically diverse (based on U.S. standards).Women serve in
leadership roles as the chair of two of the CompanyBoard's standing committees and its subsidiaries. The Financial Management Code applies tothe chairs of two other Board committees are held by ethnically diverse directors. All the members of our Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, primary financial officers in each business unit and all professionals in finance and finance-related departments. We intend to satisfy any disclosure obligations under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K by posting on our website information about amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the Financial Management Code that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer or Corporate Controller. The Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and chartersstand for the Audit, Compensation, Finance, Investment and Risk Management and Nominating and Governance Committees.election annually.
Director Independence
In accordance with the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board undertook reviews of director independence in February 2015 and February 2016. During these reviews, the Board received a report from the Company’s General Counsel noting that there were no transactions or relationships between the Company or its subsidiaries and any of the independent directors (i.e., Messrs. Bartlett, Boot, Danahy, Eason, Henderson, Sievert and Tulin and Mses. Detrick and Phillips) nor any member of such director’s immediate family. The purpose of this review was to determine whether any of those directors had a material relationship with the Company that would preclude such director from being independent under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") or our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined, in its judgment, that each of the nine directors named above are independent of the Company and its management under the applicable standards. Mr. Woodring, our Chief Executive Officer, and Ms. Manning, our President, are not independent directors.
Board Diversity
The Board believes that it is essential that directors representrepresenting diverse perspectives, skills and experience. experience are essential for ensuring the Company's long-term success and stability.When evaluating the various qualifications, experiences and backgrounds of Board candidates,nominees, the Board reviews and discusses many aspects of diversity such as gender, race, national origin, education, professional experience, geographic representation, ethnicity and differences in viewpoints and skills.To the extent possible, director recruitment efforts include several of these factors and the Board strives to recruit candidates that enhance the Board’sBoard's diversity.
Board Leadership Structure
In recognition of the differences between the two roles and in order to maximize effective Board leadership, our Company has separatedmaintained the positionseparate positions of Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and ChairmanChair of the Board since we became a public company in 1993.The Board believes the Board Chair and CEO have distinct responsibilities. The CEO is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the Company and the day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company, while the ChairmanCompany.
The Chair of the Board Board:
•provides guidance to the CEO, CEO;
•sets the agenda for Board meetings, meetings;
•presides over meetings of the full Board and Board;
•presides at the regularly scheduled executive sessions of the independent directors;
•has the duty to advise the CEO of any information needs that the Board may have; and
•has the ability to retain legal, accounting or other advisors in connection with executive sessions of the independent directors.
The Board’s RoleBoard regularly reviews its leadership structure, in Risk Oversightlight of current corporate governance trends and developments, to ensure that the current leadership structure strikes an appropriate balance for the Company and its stakeholders, and promotes the long-term interests of shareholders. Upon such review, and in light of the Company's 30 year history of having a separate CEO and Board Chair, the Board continues to believe that the current structure remains in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.
Director Commitments
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines encourage directors to limit the number of other public company boards on which they serve, taking into account the requirements of time, participation and attendance that multiple board service entails. Additionally, the Board encourages directors with full-time employment or other obligations to ensure that they have sufficient time to devote to the Board in light of their obligations to the Company and their other commitments. The Board has an active and ongoing role, as a whole and also at the committee level, in overseeing managementbelieves that all of the Company’s risks. The following table summarizes each committee's responsibilities regarding risk oversight.nominees are in compliance with this policy.
RISK OVERSIGHT |
| | | | | |
Committee of the Board | Areas of Risk Oversight | Additional Information |
Audit | Accounting and financial reporting risk, ethics and compliance matters | Reviews reports on ethics and compliance matters each quarter |
Compensation | Risks relating to the Company's employee compensation policies, practices, plans and arrangements | Oversees the management of compensation risks, including executive retention |
Finance, Investment and
Risk Management ("FIRM") | Financial risks, investment risks and overall enterprise risk management | Reviews, monitors and, when appropriate, approves the Company's programs, policies and strategies relating to financial and investment risks |
Nominating and Governance | Risks associated with the independence of the Board of Directors, leadership development and CEO succession planning | Oversees risks related to succession planning and board retention, refreshment and development |
Director Access to Management and to Outside AdvisorsWhile each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risksDirectors have full and overseeing the management of such risks, committee meetings are scheduled so that the entire Board of Directors (including directors who are not committee members) is ablefree access to participate in committee meetingsofficers and stay apprised of the risks monitored and discussed by each committee. In addition, each committee provides recommendations to the full Board as required or appropriate.
Risk Considerations in our Compensation Program
The Compensation Committee considers the risks associated with our compensation policies and practices with respect to both executive compensation and compensation generally. The Compensation Committee continually considers the Company’s long-standing culture, which emphasizes incremental continuous improvement and sustained long-term shareholder value creation, and ensures that these factors are reflected in the design of the Company’s compensations plans. Our compensation program is structured so that a considerable amount of our incentive-eligible employees’ compensation is tied to the long-term healthemployees of the Company. We avoidAny meetings or contacts that a director wishes to initiate may be arranged through the type of disproportionately large, annual incentivesCEO or the Corporate Secretary; provided, that, could encourage employeesusing such person's best judgment to take risksassure that mayany such contact would not be in our shareholder’s long-term interests and we weight our management’s incentive compensation toward profitability and long-term performance. We believe this combinationdisruptive to the business operations of factors encourages our executives and other employees to manage the Company, a director may contact any officer or employee directly, if he or she wishes to do so.
The Board and each committee may obtain advice and assistance from outside advisors as the Board or committee may determine necessary or advisable in a prudent manner with a focus on increasing long-term shareholder value. Furthermore, as described in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" below, the Compensation Committee may exercise full discretion and include subjective considerations in its incentive compensation decisions.
While a significant portion of our executive compensation plan is performance-based, we do not believe that our program encourages excessive or unnecessary risk-taking. Risk-taking is a fundamental and necessary part of our business, and our Compensation Committee has focused on aligning the Company’s compensation policiesconnection with the Company’s long-term interestsdischarge of its duties and avoiding short-term rewardsresponsibilities. Any such advisor may, but need not be, otherwise engaged by the Company for management decisions that could pose long-term risks toany other purpose. The Company pays the Company. The following policiesfees and practices emphasize the Compensation Committee’s focus on balancing risk with reward:
|
| | |
Risk Balancing Practices and Policies |
Annual Bonus Plan | ● | Our Annual Bonus Plan ("ABP") is designed to reinforce our pay-for-performance culturecosts of any outside advisor including, without limitation, usual and customary expenses and charges, as such compensation shall be determined and agreed by making a significant portion of management's annual compensation variable. |
● | ABP awards are based solely on Company results or on a combination of Company, business unit and/or individual performance. |
● | The ABP aligns annual cash bonus compensation with our short-term business strategies and the targets reflect our short-term goals for operating earnings per share, book value per share, revenue and new business embedded value. |
● | The Compensation Committee sets award levels with a minimum level of performance that must be met before any payment can be made. |
● | To further ensure that there is not a significant incentive for unnecessary risk-taking, we cap the payout of these awards at 200% of the target. |
Performance Contingent Share Grants | ● | Our performance contingent share ("PCS") grants are a three-year performance-driven incentive program that reinforces our intermediate-term strategic, financial and operating goals. |
● | The Compensation Committee sets award levels with a minimum level of performance that must be met before any payment can be made. |
● | To further ensure that there is not a significant incentive for unnecessary risk-taking, we cap the payout of these awards at 200% of target. |
● | We measure performance for the PCS grants based 33.5% on operating return on equity, 33.5% on relative return on equity compared to an established peer group and 33.0% on a cumulative revenue growth rate, all calculated as of the end of the applicable three-year performance period. |
Stock Appreciation Rights | ● | We believe that Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs") provide the most appropriate vehicle for providing long-term value to management because of the economic tie to shareholder value. |
● | We believe annual grants of SARs allow us to reward the achievement of long-term goals and are based on our desire to achieve an appropriate balance between the overall risk and reward for short, intermediate and long-term incentive opportunities. |
● | The vesting schedule for SARs grants is four years, 25% of which vests at the end of each of the first four years. Upon vesting, the SARs are settled in the equivalent value of unrestricted shares of common stock. |
Share Ownership Guidelines | ● | Our share ownership guidelines require members of senior management to hold a specified number of shares of Company stock which is based on the level of their role and responsibility in the organization. |
● | Share ownership requirements ensure that our senior management will have a significant amount of value tied to long-term holdings in Company stock and align their interests with those of our shareholders. |
Executive Incentive Recoupment Policy | ● | Our Executive Incentive Recoupment Policy permits the Company to recoup all or a portion of incentive awards paid to certain executives upon the occurrence of certain recoupment events. |
● | Such events include: (i) a financial restatement due to the material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the federal securities laws; (ii) receiving an incentive award based on materially inaccurate financial statements or any other materially inaccurate performance metric criteria; (iii) causing injury to the interests or business reputation of the Company or of a business unit whether due to violations of law, regulatory sanctions or otherwise and (iv) a material violation of the Company's Principles of Ethical Business Conduct. |
● | The Compensation Committee has express authority to interpret and administer the policy, implement various remedies based on the circumstances triggering the recoupment and make all determinations with respect to the policy in its sole discretion. |
Combination of Performance Metrics | ● | We use a combination of performance metrics in determining our executives' performance-based compensation that motivate our executives to achieve performance that is in line with the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. |
● | By using a variety of performance metrics in our Annual Bonus Plan and our intermediate and long-term performance programs, we mitigate the risk that our executives would be motivated to pursue results with respect to one performance measure to the detriment of the Company as a whole. |
Independent Compensation Consultant | ● | The Compensation Committee benefits from its use of an independent compensation consulting firm which provides no other services to the Company. |
Communications with the Board of Directors
The process for communicating with the Board requires that the General Counsel make a record of the receipt of any such communications. All properly addressed communications will be delivered to
the specified recipient(s) not less than once each calendar quarter and will not be directed to or reviewed by management prior to receipt by such persons.committee.
Board Meetings
The Board of Directors held a total of teneighteen meetings during 2015. Each2023. No director attended at leastfewer than 75% of the meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she served during 2015.2023. We do not have a policy with regard to attendance by directors at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The ChairmanMr. O’Hearn, Chair of the Board, attended the 20152023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
BOARD COMMITTEESBoard Evaluations and Assessments
The Nominating and Governance Committee supervises the Board's periodic self-evaluation assessment and review of director independence. The assessment is usually developed internally with a typical structure focused on two sections: an "inward-looking" section, in which directors respond to questions directly relating to their roles on the Board; and an "outward-looking" section, which involves questions relating to the Board as a whole. After receiving a summary of the assessment results in late August, our Board Chair conducts individual interviews with each director in September to discuss responses, recommendations and concerns. This also allows directors an opportunity to raise sensitive subject matters in discussions with the Chair. The Chair then prepares a memo summarizing, without attribution, the key items identified in the survey and interviews, and leads a discussion at the Board meeting in October where all directors discuss the findings and develop an action plan to implement desired changes and improvements for the following year.
In certain years, an independent consultant is engaged to perform the assessment. In 2021, an independent consultant was engaged to conduct the assessment and, at the Board's request, the process included a specific focus on the Board's overall effectiveness, the functioning of the committees, and the contributions of each of the Board members. It also included development of interview questions, observation of Board and committee meetings, individual director interviews (including a peer review component), individual interviews of the executive management team, individual director feedback on the peer review component and a detailed final report with specific governance observations and recommendations.
Director and Nominee Independence Determinations
In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board undertook reviews of director independence in March 2023 and March 2024. During these reviews, the Board received a report from the Company's General Counsel noting that there were no transactions or relationships between the Company or its subsidiaries and any of the non-employee directors, nor any member of such director's immediate family. The purpose of this review was to determine whether any of those directors had a material relationship with the Company that would preclude such director from being independent under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") or our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined, in its judgment, that each of the non-employee directors are independent of the Company and its management under the applicable standards. Mr. Cheng, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is not independent.
Board Committees
The Board of Directors has the followingsix standing committees:
•Audit Committee;
•Committee, Cybersecurity and Technology Committee, Human Capital and Compensation Committee;
•Finance,Committee, Investment and Risk Management Committee; and
•Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee and Risk Committee.
The Board has also organized a sub-groupsubgroup of directors who meet periodically with members of Company management regarding significant insurance, reinsurance or other transactions being considered by the Company. The Board periodically reviews the composition of these committees and rotates membership from time to discuss significant acquisition opportunities.time. Information about the committees'committee membership, independence, qualifications, roles and responsibilities is provided below. | BOARD COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP |
| | | | | |
| Director | Independent | Audit | Compensation | Finance, Investment and Risk Management | Nominating and Governance |
| William J. Bartlett | yes | chair | | member | |
| Arnoud W.A. Boot | yes | member | | member | |
| John F. Danahy | yes | member | chair | | |
| Christine R. Detrick | yes | member | | | member |
| J. Cliff Eason | yes | | member | | member |
| Alan C. Henderson | yes | | | chair | member |
| Anna Manning | no | | | | |
| Joyce A. Phillips | yes | | member | | member |
| Frederick J. Sievert | yes | | member | | chair |
| Stanley B. Tulin | yes | | member | member | |
| A. Greig Woodring | no | | | member | |
| Number of Meetings in 2015 | | 8 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
Board Committee Roles & Responsibilities
13The Board has adopted written charters for each committee, which are available on our website at www.rgare.com. Each of the committees consists solely of directors who have been determined by the Board to be independent in accordance with SEC regulations, NYSE listing standards and the Company's director independence standards set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. The following describes the roles, responsibilities and independence standards of each committee:
| AUDIT COMMITTEE | | | | | | | |
| | |
| Roles and Responsibilities |
| ● | Responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent auditor. |
| ● | Oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and policies and the integrity of our financial statements. |
| ● | Supervises the adequacy of our internal controls over financial and sustainability reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. |
| ● | Pre-approves audit, audit-related and non-audit services to be performed by the Company's independent auditor. |
| ● | Reviews reports concerning significant legal and regulatory matters. |
| ● | Reviews the plans and performance of our internal audit function. |
| ● | Oversees the Company's ethics and compliance policies. |
| ● | Reviews and discusses our filings on Forms 10-K and 10-Q, including the financial information in those filings. |
| Independence and Financial Literacy |
| ● | The Board has determined that the members are "independent" within the meaning of SECSecurities and Exchange Commission regulations applicable to audit committees and the NYSE listing standards. |
| ● | The Board has determined that all of the members have accounting and related financial management expertise within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards. |
| ● | The Board has determined that all the members are qualified as audit committee financial experts within the meaning of SECSecurities and Exchange Commission regulations. |
| | |
| Cybersecurity and Technology Committee |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE |
| Roles and Responsibilities |
| ● | Oversees and monitors the technology governance programs and policies, including risk appetite and key risk indicators, established by the Company for identifying, measuring, mitigating, managing, reporting, and testing cybersecurity, data privacy and technology related business continuity risks. |
| ● | Reviews and discusses the Company's technology service delivery, including costs and benefits of proposed significant technology projects and initiatives, and training related to cybersecurity, data privacy, and technology related business continuity. |
| ● | Monitors management's strategy and progress in achieving planned cybersecurity, data privacy and technology related business continuity objectives. |
| | | | | | | | |
| ● | Reviews and discusses with management and, as appropriate, the Board and/or Board committees, the Company's cybersecurity, data privacy, and technology related business continuity compliance risks, including third party controls and IT-related independent assessments and audits. |
| ● | Regularly reports to and advises the Board to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for oversight of technology strategy, service deliver and governance. |
| Independence |
| ● | The Board of Directors has determined that all of the Committee's members are independent. |
| | |
| Human Capital and Compensation Committee |
| Roles and Responsibilities |
| ● | Establishes and oversees our general compensation, benefits programs and benefits programs.human capital matters. |
| ● | Reviews and approves the performance and compensation of the CEO, other named executive officers and members of our senior management. |
| ● | Sets performance measures and goals and verifiesreviews the attainment of performance goals under performance-based incentive compensation plans. |
Independence● | Oversees key issues, policies and programs relating to the Company's workforce, including recruitment, engagement, retention, development and performance management. |
| Independence |
| ● | The Board of Directors has determined in its judgment, that all of the Committee's members are independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards. |
| ● | For purposes of its independence determination, the Board considered the enhanced independence standards for compensation committees under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 which are required by the SEC for the listing standards of national securities exchanges. |
| Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation |
| ● | The members of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee are not and have never been officers or employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. |
| ● | No directors or executive officers of our Company serve on the compensation committeeboard of directors of another company of which a member of our Human Capital and Compensation Committee is an officer. |
| | |
| Investment Committee |
FINANCE, INVESTMENT AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE |
| Roles and Responsibilities |
| ● | Assists the Board in connection with its oversight responsibilities for the Company's risk, investment and finance policies, practices, programs, procedures and strategies.strategies, including asset, liability and risk management guidelines, limits and procedures. |
| ● | Reviews monitors,the quality, performance and when appropriate, approvesrisk characteristics of the Company's programs,investment portfolios, and the alignment of assets with mandate guidelines, including duration, designed to align the asset portfolio with corresponding liabilities. |
| ● | Reviews strategies and policies and strategies relating to financialvarious categories of securities and investment risksother investments, including derivatives, and overall enterpriseother tools and capabilities, with material risk management Governance Guidelines.implications. |
| | Independence |
NOMINATING AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE● | The Board of Directors has determined that all of the Committee's members are independent. |
| | |
| Nominating and Governance Committee |
| Roles and Responsibilities |
| ● | Develops and implements policies and practices relating to corporate governance. |
| ● | Reviews and monitors implementation of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.Guidelines and other governance policies. |
| ● | Identifies individuals qualified to become members of the Board, consistent with the criteria established by the Board; develops and reviews background information on candidates for the Board; and makes recommendations to the Board regarding such candidates. |
| ● | Prepares and supervises the Board's annual review of director independence and the performance of self-evaluations conducted by the Board and committees. |
| ● | Oversees the succession planning process for our CEO, which includes reviewing development plans for potential successors evaluating potential internal and external successors for executive and senior management positions, and development and periodic review of the Company's plans for CEO succession in various circumstances. Evaluates potential internal and external successors for other executive and senior management positions. |
Independence● | Oversees the Company's environmental, social, and governance risks. |
| ● | Supports the Board in its oversight of sustainability and environmental, social and governance issues and coordinates with other Committees on these topics. |
| | | | | | | | |
| Independence |
| ● | The Board of Directors has determined in its judgment, that all of the Committee's members are independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards. |
| | |
| Risk Committee |
| Roles and Responsibilities |
| ● | Assists the Board with its oversight responsibilities by promoting appropriate practices regarding risk management. |
| ● | Reviews and oversees management's enterprise risk management programs and policies, and monitors risks relating to the Company's business, operations, compliance, reputation and ethics. |
| Independence |
| ● | The Board of Directors has determined that all of the Committee's members are independent. |
| | |
| | |
Board Committee Membership | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Director | Independent | Audit | Cybersecurity and
Technology | Human Capital and Compensation | Investment | Nominating and Governance | Risk |
| Pina Albo | yes | | | member | member | member | |
| Michele Bang | yes | member | member | | | | member |
| John J. Gauthier | yes | | | member | chair | | member |
| Patricia L. Guinn | yes | chair | | | member | member | |
| Hazel M. McNeilage | yes | | member | chair | | | member |
| George Nichols III | yes | | member | member | | member | |
| Shundrawn Thomas | yes | | | member | member | chair | |
| Khanh T. Tran | yes | member | | | member | | chair |
| Steven C. Van Wyk | yes | member | chair | | | | member |
| Number of Meetings in 2023 | | 12 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Given their roles as Chair and CEO, respectively, Messrs. O'Hearn and Cheng do not serve on any Board committees. Additionally, given that she has recently joined the Board, Ms. Rand does not currently serve on any Board committee.
Director Compensation
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee (the "Committee") reviews director compensation periodically and recommends changes to the Board, when it deems appropriate, based on a variety of factors, including guidance and market information provided to the Committee by an independent compensation consultant. The Committee also reviews the responsibilities of directors generally, the responsibilities of Board and committee chairs and market practices. The Board reviews the recommendations of the Committee and provides final approval for the form and amount of director compensation. Directors who also serve as employees of the Company do not receive payment for services as a director.
Based on recommendations from Meridian Compensation Partners ("Meridian"), the Committee's independent compensation consultant, and review and discussion by the Committee in July 2021, director compensation pay levels and program design will be reviewed every two years, with any adjustments typically taking effect the following year. Meridian analyzed director compensation programs and pay levels among the Company's peer group and recommended targeted compensation in
line with the projected median of the peer group. Meridian advised that the Company's director compensation program was generally aligned with market practices by allocating a majority of director compensation in the form of equity. Meridian recommended, and the Committee approved a $5,000 increase in the annual equity retainer for the Chair of the Board, effective in May 2023.
Information regarding the retention of Meridian can be found under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Compensation Process – Compensation Consultant" below. Information regarding the 2021 peer companies used to set 2022 director compensation can be found under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Executive Compensation Process – Competitive Marketplace Assessment" in our Proxy Statement for our 2021 annual meeting of shareholders.
2023 Director Compensation
During 2023, Mr. Cheng and Ms. Manning were the only directors employed by the Company, and the other directors were not employees of our Company or any subsidiary ("non-employee directors"). During 2023, compensation to our non-employee directors consisted of the following elements:
2023 Director Compensation Structure
| | | | | | | | |
| Annual Retainer | |
| Chair of the Board | $215,000 |
| All other independent directors | $115,000 |
| Committee Chair Additional Retainer | |
| Audit Committee Chair | $27,500 |
| Cybersecurity and Technology Subgroup Chair | $22,500 |
| Human Capital and Compensation Committee Chair | $22,500 |
| Investment Committee Chair | $22,500 |
| Nominating and Governance Committee Chair | $22,500 |
| Risk Committee Chair | $22,500 |
| Subgroup Member Retainer | |
| Transaction Review Subgroup | $10,000 |
Cybersecurity and Technology Subgroup1 | $10,000 |
Annual Stock Grants2 | |
| Chair of the Board | $285,000 |
| All other independent directors | $155,000 |
1This subgroup was converted to a full Board committee in 2023. This retainer will not be paid in 2024.
14
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONSshares issued is based upon the fair market value of the stock on the date of the grant.
We also reimburse directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending and participating in Board and Committee meetings and director education programs. The Company also matches charitable donations made by each director in an amount up to $1,500 each year.
2023 Director Compensation
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash1 | Stock Awards2 | All Other Compensation3 | Total |
| Pina Albo | $115,000 | $154,947 | $— | $269,947 |
| Michele Bang | $67,500 | $— | $— | $67,500 |
| John J. Gauthier | $147,500 | $154,947 | $1,500 | $303,947 |
| Patricia L. Guinn | $152,500 | $154,947 | $1,500 | $308,947 |
| Hazel M. McNeilage | $147,500 | $154,947 | $1,500 | $303,947 |
Ng Keng Hooi4 | $52,084 | $64,609 | $— | $116,693 |
| George Nichols III | $125,000 | $154,947 | $— | $279,947 |
| Stephen O'Hearn | $225,000 | $285,033 | $1,500 | $511,533 |
| Shundrawn Thomas | $147,500 | $154,947 | $1,500 | $303,947 |
| Khanh T. Tran | $147,500 | $154,947 | $1,500 | $303,947 |
| Steven C. Van Wyk | $137,500 | $154,947 | $— | $292,447 |
1.This column reflects the retainer and fees earned in 2023 for Board and committee service. The 2023 cash retainer was paid in May 2023 to all directors, other than Ms. Bang. Ms. Bang joined the Board effective October 1, 2023 and the cash payment made to her consists of a prorated portion of: (i) the annual cash retainer and (ii) the annual stock grant to directors, paid in cash rather than equity because of the timing of Ms. Bang joining the Board. Messrs. Ng and Van Wyk elected to defer their retainers into the Phantom Stock Plan for Directors.
2.This column reflects: (i) the award of 1,072 shares (1,972 shares in the case of Mr. O'Hearn) of common stock on May 24, 2023, at a closing market price of $144.54. Ms. McNeilage and Messrs. Ng, O'Hearn, and Van Wyk elected to defer their stock awards under the Flexible Stock Plan for Directors into the Phantom Stock Plan for Directors.
3.This column reflects director participation in the Company's Matching Gifts program which supports eligible participants in their personal philanthropic and charitable giving by providing a limited dollar-for-dollar match (up to $1,500 per calendar year).
4.Mr. Ng served as a director until May 2023 and did not stand for re-election at the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders. He received a pro rata portion of the annual cash retainer and annual stock award.
2024 Director Compensation
In July 2023 Meridian analyzed director compensation programs and pay levels among the Company's peer group and recommended targeted compensation in line with the projected median of the peer group. Meridian advised that the Company's director compensation program was generally aligned with market practices. Meridian recommended, and the Committee approved the following changes to Director Compensation for 2024:
•a $10,000 increase in the annual cash retainer for directors other than the Chair of the Board;
•a $10,000 increase to the annual equity retainer for directors other than the Chair of the Board;
•a $7,500 increase to the annual Committee Chair retainer for the Audit Committee; and
•a $2,500 increase to the annual Committee chair retainer for the Cybersecurity and Technology, Human Capital and Compensation, Investment, Nominating and Governance, and Risk Committees.
No compensation changes were made for the Chair of the Board for 2024.
Board Risk Oversight
Overview
The Company encounters a variety of risks as an inherent part of serving our clients' needs, including risks related to insurance, investments, capital, liquidity, personnel, reputation, strategy and operations.Given the nature of the Company's business and the inherent risks associated with our operations, effective risk management is of significant importance to our overall operations. We have designed an Enterprise Risk Management ("ERM") Program and related policies in order to monitor, evaluate and manage the principal risks the Company assumes in its business activities. The Company's primary objective is managing our business, and the associated risks, in order to balance serving the interests of our clients, their policyholders and customers, regulatory bodies, our investors, our employees and other relevant constituencies. We strive to manage our business in a safe and responsible manner to fulfill our purpose of making financial protection accessible to all.
The Board is responsible, and has an active and ongoing role, for overseeing the management of the Company's most significant risks, including setting the types and levels of risk the Company is willing to take, and holds senior management accountable for implementing the ERM Program. This oversight is exercised by the full Board, as well as each Committee and subgroup, primarily through its Risk Committee. The Risk Committee receives regular reports and assessments from senior Company management, who is responsible for the day-to-day identification, assessment and monitoring of the risks the Company faces. The Company's Global Chief Risk Officer reports to the President and Chief Executive Officer and has direct access to the Board through the Risk Committee, with formal reporting occurring quarterly. Management reports describe the Company's key risk exposures and include quantitative and qualitative assessments and information about breaches, exceptions and waivers from the ERM Program.
While the full Board retains oversight of risk, it also utilizes its committees to oversee particular areas of Company risk. Allocation of oversight responsibility to a particular committee is determined based on the expertise of committee members, the overall level of Company risk and other factors evaluated by the Board for each category of risk. Committee chairs regularly report to the full Board regarding specific categories of risks discussed during committee meetings. Issues related to risk that are brought to the attention of the full Board may be addressed in several ways, including the establishment of a focused subgroup tasked with addressing the issue, or the Board may request that senior management more frequently address the issue with the full Board. In 2023, the Board approved the conversion of the Cybersecurity and Technology Subgroup to a full Board committee. The following table summarizes each committee's general responsibilities for risk oversight:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Board Committee Risk Oversight |
| Committee of the Board | Areas of Risk Oversight | Additional Information |
| Audit | Accounting, legal, financial reporting and compliance risks. | Reviews reports on ethics and compliance matters each quarter relating to accounting, financial and sustainability reporting and internal control risks; assists in monitoring, controlling and minimizing the Company's major financial risk exposures. |
Cybersecurity and
Technology | Risk related to cybersecurity, data privacy and technology related business continuity risks. | Oversees and monitors the technology planning, strategy, programs and policies, including risk appetite and key risk indicators, established by the Company for identifying, measuring, mitigating, managing, reporting, and testing cybersecurity, data privacy, and technology related business continuity risks. |
| Human Capital and Compensation | Risks relating to the Company's workforce, including incentive compensation plans, recruitment, retention and performance management. | Oversees the management of human capital and compensation risks, including executive retention and recruitment and employee development, performance management and pay equity. |
| Investment | Financial and investment risks. | Reviews the quality, performance and risk characteristics of the Company's investment portfolios, strategies and policies relating to securities and other investments with material risk implications. |
| Nominating and Governance | Risks associated with corporate governance, sustainability and ESG, the independence of the Board of Directors, leadership development and director and CEO succession planning. | Oversees risks related to governance matters such as board leadership and structure, succession planning, refreshment, development and independence; supports the Board in oversight of sustainability and ESG strategy, coordinating with other committees on these topics. |
| Risk | Oversight of all Company risks, as well as enterprise risk management and assessment. | Reviews, oversees, monitors and, when appropriate, approves the Company's ERM Program and related policies and strategies; monitors established risk limits and consults with management on risk identification, measurement and monitoring processes and programs, including climate change and other impacts on strategy and reputation. |
The Board established the Transaction Review subgroup to have focused risk oversight responsibility over significant insurance, reinsurance or other transactions. It is comprised fully of independent directors and liaises with management to review significant transactions to ensure alignment with the Company's strategies and risk philosophies.
Given the long-term nature of the Company's business, the Board, its committees and subgroup, and management regularly evaluate risk over the short-, intermediate-, and long-terms in line with the ERM Program. The ERM Program establishes the principles used to effect risk management enterprise-wide, and also provides clarity on the roles and activities across the Company.The Company utilizes a rating system that reflects the nature of the risk and changes in risks over time, that quantifies those risks (to the extent applicable) and evaluates the effects of the risk mitigants available to the Company.Management also utilizes a risk rating system to categorize audit findings and risk incidents to help allocate internal resources and track remediation efforts.In monitoring these remediation efforts, the Company tracks and evaluates the effectiveness of risk mitigations that it implements. The Company and its management participate in industry bodies and consult with external experts as needed to help analyze and classify Company risks.
The Company completes regular reviews of its risk environment, including formal reviews by the Board and its committees at their regularly scheduled meetings.Internal risk committees composed of senior management personnel also meet several times per year to review risks within the purview of each such committee.Additionally, the Company undertakes a thorough annual process in the following areas:
•Review, from both "bottom-up" and "top-down" perspectives, to identify new or rapidly evolving risks and necessary preventive or remedial actions.
•Risk culture survey measuring the health of the Company's risk culture.
•Review of risk limits.
•Own Risk and Solvency Assessment, which summarizes the results of the Company's analysis of its current and future risks and is reported to certain U.S. insurance regulators.
Executive Compensation Risks
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee (the "Committee") oversees risks associated with our compensation policies and practices.The Committee keeps in view the Company's long-standing culture of incremental continuous improvement and sustained long-term shareholder value creation, and ensures that the design of the Company's compensations plans adequately reflect this culture.Our compensation program is structured so that a considerable amount of our incentive-eligible employees' compensation is tied to the long-term health of the Company.We avoid the type of disproportionately large annual incentives that could encourage employees to take risks that may not be in our shareholder's long-term interests, and we weight management's incentive compensation toward profitability and long-term performance.We believe this combination of factors best encourages our executives and other employees to manage the Company in a prudent manner with a focus on increasing long-term shareholder value.Furthermore, as described in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" below, the Committee may exercise full discretion and include subjective considerations in its incentive compensation decisions.
While a significant portion of our executive compensation plan is performance-based, we do not believe that our program encourages excessive or unnecessary risk-taking. Informed risk-taking is a fundamental and necessary part of our business, and the Committee focuses on aligning the Company's compensation policies with the Company's long-term interests and avoiding short-term rewards for management decisions that could pose long-term risks to the Company. The following policies and practices emphasize the Committee's focus on balancing appropriate risk-taking with reward:
| | | | | | | | |
| Compensation Risks |
| Risk Balancing Practices and Policies |
| Annual Bonus Plan | ● | Our Annual Bonus Plan ("ABP") is designed to reinforce our pay-for-performance culture by making a significant portion of management's annual compensation variable. |
| ● | ABP awards are either based solely on Company results or on a combination of Company, business unit and/or individual performance. |
| ● | The ABP aligns annual cash compensation with our short-term business strategies and the targets reflect our short-term goals for adjusted operating income per share, strategic scorecard, new business embedded value and annual adjusted consolidated revenue. |
| ● | The Committee sets award levels with a minimum level of performance that must be met before any payment can be made. |
| ● | To further reduce any incentives for unnecessary risk-taking, we cap the payout of these awards at 200% of the target and the Committee has discretion to adjust up or down an ABP payment, if appropriate. |
| Performance Contingent Awards | ● | Our performance contingent share ("PCS") grants are a three-year performance-driven incentive program that reinforces our intermediate-term strategic, financial and operating goals. |
| ● | The Committee sets award levels with a minimum level of performance that must be met before any payment can be made. |
| ● | To further ensure that there is not a significant incentive for unnecessary risk-taking, we cap the payout of these awards at 200% of target. |
| ● | 2022 and 2023 grants were determined by Company financial performance over a three-year period, based on (i) three-year average adjusted return on equity and (ii) three-year book value per share, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income, growth rate. Results may be modified up or down by no more than 10% based on three-year relative total shareholder return. |
| Stock Appreciation Rights | ● | We believe that Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs") provide an appropriate vehicle for providing long-term incentives to management because of the economic tie to shareholder value. |
| ● | Annual grants of SARs allow us to reward the achievement of long-term goals and are part of our strategy to achieve an appropriate balance between the overall risk and reward for short, intermediate and long-term incentive opportunities. |
| ● | The vesting schedule for SARs grants is four years, 25% of which vests at the end of each year. Upon vesting, the SARs become exercisable by recipients in the equivalent value of unrestricted shares of common stock. |
| | | | | | | | |
| Restricted Share Units | ● | Our annual restricted stock units ("RSUs") are a three-year time vested incentive award with final value tied solely to the Company's stock price, fully vesting at the end of such three-year period. Upon vesting, RSUs are settled in the equivalent value of unrestricted shares of common stock. |
| ● | We use RSUs to balance the performance-based elements of our long-term incentive plan and to better align our award mix with the external market. |
| Share Ownership Guidelines | ● | Our share ownership guidelines require members of senior management to hold a specified number of shares of Company stock which is based on a multiple of base salary tied to the level of their role and responsibility in the organization. |
| ● | Share ownership requirements ensure that our senior management has a significant amount of value tied to long-term holdings in Company stock and align their interests with those of our shareholders. |
| Executive Compensation Recoupment Policies | | NYSE Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy |
| ● | In 2023, the Company adopted a new policy in order to comply with New York Stock Exchange listing standards adopted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and related SEC regulations (the "NYSE Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy"). |
| ● | The NYSE Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy applies by its terms to all current and former executives who are or were "officers" of the Company as defined in SEC Rule 16(a)-1(f). |
| ● | The Company is required to clawback any amount of incentive compensation erroneously paid to the officer as a result of a restatement of the Company's financial statements (including up to three years prior to the restatement). Recoupment is required from the officer irrespective of whether the restatement was the result of any act or omission of the officer. |
| Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy |
| ● | Our Executive Incentive Recoupment Policy permits the Company to recoup all or a portion of incentive awards paid to certain executives upon the occurrence of certain recoupment events. |
| ● | Such events include: (i) a financial restatement due to the material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the federal securities laws; (ii) receiving an incentive award based on materially inaccurate financial statements or any other materially inaccurate performance metric criteria (in each case of (i) and (ii), resulting from the intentional misconduct or gross negligence of the executive); (iii) causing injury to the interests or business reputation of the Company or of a business unit whether due to violations of law, regulatory sanctions or otherwise and (iv) a material violation of the Company's Code of Conduct. |
| ● | The Committee has express authority to interpret and administer the policy, implement various remedies based on the circumstances triggering the recoupment and make all determinations with respect to the policy in its sole discretion, including determining what executives are covered. |
| Combination of Performance Metrics | ● | We use a combination of performance metrics in determining our executives' performance-based compensation that motivate our executives to achieve performance that is in line with the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. |
| ● | By using a variety of performance metrics in our compensation programs, we mitigate the risk that our executives would be motivated to pursue results with respect to one performance measure to the detriment of the Company as a whole. |
| Independent Compensation Consultant | ● | The Committee benefits from its use of an independent compensation consulting firm which provides no other services to the Company. |
Sustainability Risks
Our Company and Board believe that creating long-term value for our shareholders implicitly requires executing sustainable business practices and strategies that include consideration of environmental, social, and governance impacts by the Company as well as how such sustainability considerations impact the Company. Strong governance, effective management systems and robust controls are core to the Company. We strive to govern the Company in a sustainable manner that recognizes such matters are integral to our long-term operational goals and strategies.
The Board and its committees play an active role in oversight of the Company's sustainability transparency, policies, strategy and goals, including community engagement, environmental sustainability of operations, the role of sustainability in investment decisions, and diversity, equity and inclusion programs. The Board recognizes that healthy communities, sustainable operations, an inclusive and diverse workforce and responsible investment and data practices are important for the long-term success of the Company, and that we have a responsibility to support these issues and that these factors can provide RGA with risks and opportunities. The Board delegates oversight of relevant sustainability issues to its committees, with support from the Nominating and Governance Committee.
The Company's 2022 Sustainability Report (released in June 2023) offers additional information across the areas of: Business Ethics & Responsible Practices; Responsible Investment Approach; Sustainable Innovation for Social Impact; Culture of Care; and Environmental Stewardship. Our Sustainability Report can be found in the Investor section of our website at https://investor.rgare.com.
The contents of our Sustainability Report and related supplemental information are not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement or in any other report or document we file with the SEC.
Environmental Risks
Climate change risk is actively monitored with regards to our investment portfolio and potential impacts on mortality and morbidity. While the long-term impacts of climate change for the Company and our clients are subject to a variety of influences, as part of the ongoing monitoring and updating of the Company's risks and exposure to anything that might change underlying mortality and morbidity trends, scenario reviews and planning are undertaken for climate-change related events. The Company utilizes information derived from those scenario reviews and other sources to help inform the public of the challenges of climate change through research articles available on our website.
The Company is committed to operating in an environmentally responsible manner and strives to be a good steward of the environment. In 2022, the Company made the commitment to become net-zero in its scope 1 and scope 2 emissions globally by the end of 2026. Our headquarters, based in Chesterfield, Missouri, was constructed in line with LEED Gold requirements. The building was designed to be highly energy efficient and includes a variety of environmental features such as a state of the art HVAC and window shade system, a sophisticated building automation system, rain water collection system, and the landscaping was designed with native grasses and plants to minimize the use of irrigation.Many of the Company's other offices around the globe are located in buildings with environmental certifications.
Over the past few years we have undertaken a number of other initiatives that exemplify our commitment to the environment, including reducing our paper consumption and implementing a robust recycling and waste reduction and/or single-use plastics reduction programs, not only at our headquarters, but at many of our leased facilities, as well.
Social Risks
As a leading global life and health reinsurer, the way we operate, the work we do, and the support we provide to our local communities can all be traced to a desire to extend and improve the individual lives we touch, whether directly or through our business and community partners.
Human Capital Initiatives. The Board and the Company's senior management are committed to fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace that respects and embraces all of our employees. We strive to understand one another by providing a safe environment where individuals may share their stories and ideas, where learning is encouraged and one feels accepted and supported in our differences. We believe that diversity across the Company makes us more innovative, creative and enables us to fulfill our purpose - to make financial protection accessible to all.
The Company's aim is to evolve RGA workplaces and the communities in which the Company has a presence into more diverse, equitable and inclusive environments. In alignment with our 5-year business plan, our global strategy is focused in four areas:
•Talent. To foster a workforce representing the local markets we serve and to strengthen a culture that promotes equity and opportunity for all;
•Communities & Partnership. To advance diversity in the communities where we work, and within the financial services and insurance industries, through partnerships and philanthropy;
•Accountability & Measurement. To share progress against clearly established benchmarks and key performance measures that enable the enterprise to achieve meaningful progress; and
•Inclusive Workplace. To ensure employees are valued, feel a sense of belonging, are respected for their differences, and are encouraged and supported to reach their full potential.
The Company has undertaken many initiatives throughout 2023 to promote diversity, equity and inclusion within the Company. As a result of our achievements in these initiatives as demonstrated in the table below, we have seen improvement in representation in (i) women in Vice President and above roles throughout the world and (ii) people of color employed in the United States.
Highlights of actions taken in 2023 to improve diversity and promote equity and inclusion within the Company include:
•Developing and implementing a diversity recruitment plan to improve inclusion in our talent acquisition practices, diversify sources of qualified talent, increase diverse applicant slates and improve the quality and diversity of candidates interviewed by hiring managers for mid-level management and above roles.
•Expanding education to mid-level managers with the roll-out of inclusive leadership adding to efforts to raise consciousness of implicit bias.
•Continued promoting more transparency of initiatives and targets by broadly sharing our aspirational goals, demonstrating our commitment to our human capital initiatives.
•Launching several new Employee Resource Groups ("ERGs"). These groups provide a forum for diverse talent to engage and provide input and feedback to help strengthen a culture of inclusion. We launched an ERG Referral campaign to leverage the network of our employees, yielding stronger participation.
•Increased scholarships provided through the RGA Foundation, with many participants belonging to under-represented populations pursuing careers in data science, actuarial science, technology or medical-related disciplines.
The Company is committed to gender and racial pay equity for all employees and has completed its sixth annual pay equity study. As in years past, the Company engaged an external consulting firm specializing in pay analysis to conduct the study, which analyzed the pay of all U.S. employees and all of our employees working at non-U.S. locations with more than 50 employees (representing approximately 93% of RGA's employees worldwide). The study analyzed the average base salary, base salary plus target bonus, and base salary plus target bonus plus target long-term incentive (LTI) (where applicable) of females to males in comparable roles. The following are key findings from the 2023 study:
•For all Company locations with 50 or more employees, when comparing pay levels for those in roles in the same Global Career Framework level and Job Family Group, the average female-to-male pay ratio is 98.4% for base salary and 98.0% on both a base salary plus target bonus and base salary plus target bonus plus target LTI basis.
•In the United States, when using the same comparisons, the average non-Caucasian-to-Caucasian pay ratio is 101.5% across all three measures.
Human Capital Management. The Board believes that human capital management and succession planning, including diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, are critical to the Company's success. Our talent is our key point of differentiation in the market and a foundation of our success. Our investment in attracting, retaining, developing and motivating key talent is vital to the creation and protection of the Company's long-term shareholder value and is a high priority for our Board.
We seek to retain our employees through our culture and by delivering an exceptional employee experience, specifically we offer competitive compensation and benefit programs focused on wellbeing and create meaningful development experiences and mobility for our talent across the enterprise. We must continue to attract, develop and retain top talent to continue producing innovative solutions for clients and delivering on our purpose. Our focus on employee retention has resulted in a three-year average annual voluntary attrition rate of 7.2% globally.
The Board's involvement in leadership development and succession planning is ongoing and the Board provides input on important decisions in these areas. The Board, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee oversee these areas and are
regularly updated on past performance of key talent indicators for the overall workforce, including recruiting, attrition, engagement and diversity, equity and inclusion.
For additional information on human capital management, refer to Item 1 of the Company's financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as filed with the SEC.
Charitable Giving and Volunteerism. We embrace our responsibility as a corporate leader in the communities in which we live and work. The Company participates in philanthropic activities relevant to our business and linked to our mission, vision and values. The Company and its employees regularly contribute to local, national and regional non-profit organizations that promote health, well-being, financial protection, and support for education in fields that expand the diversity of the talent pool entering the insurance industry. The Company makes contributions directly, but also a portion of those donations come from our Matching Gift Program, which enables employees to donate to the charity of their choice. We also encourage employee volunteerism with employee Volunteer Time Off, partnering with community service organizations to provide opportunities for employees to donate time and talents to assist neighbors in need.
The Company's charitable foundation, the RGA Foundation, participates in charitable giving activities worldwide in the cities and regions where we are an active member of the community and in causes relevant to our business and linked to our mission, vision and values. The RGA Foundation funds charitable grants related to priority areas, which include advancements in health, longevity, medical and mathematical education, community programs and disaster relief.
The Company is a co-founder of the Longer Life Foundation, a non-profit corporation, with Washington University in St. Louis. Each year, the Longer Life Foundation provides grants to support innovative independent research by scientific, medical and public health experts working to make discoveries that will improve long-term mortality, enhance longevity and promote healthier lives.
In the two decades since its inception, the Longer Life Foundation has funded more than 150 research projects, many of which expanded clinical knowledge in fields as diverse as longevity, genomics, obesity, older-age cognition, heart disease and cancer. More than 170 publications by foundation-funded researchers have been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. The Longer Life Foundation is distinctive as an academic-corporate initiative to support fully independent research, the results of which are published for the benefit of the entire medical community.
The Longer Life Foundation advisory group comprises diverse university physicians and researchers, as well as medical directors and underwriting experts from the Company and other life insurance organizations; these individuals evaluate grant proposals and make recommendations to the foundation's Board of Governors for approval.
Industry Advancement. We believe strongly in the power of shared knowledge. Our employees are known industry-wide for leadership in industry organizations. The Company regularly releases research to advance the understanding of risk and improve the actuarial, underwriting, and claims disciplines.
Data Privacy & Information Security. Our Board recognizes the importance of maintaining the trust and confidence of our clients, business partners and employees. As part of its objective, independent oversight of the key risks facing the Company, the Board devotes significant time and attention to data privacy, data and systems protection, including cybersecurity and information security risks. The Board's Cybersecurity and Technology Committee oversees and monitors the technology planning, strategy, programs and policies, including risk appetite and key risk indicators, established by the Company for identifying, measuring, mitigating, managing, reporting and testing cybersecurity, data privacy and technology-related business continuity risks.
In 2021, the Company established a Data and Analytics Ethics Framework and Guiding Principles and an oversight board to guide and oversee emerging issues in data and analytics ethics.This
framework and board enhance the Company's ability to make ethical decisions about how data and analytics processes should be used to protect personal data and avoid unfair discrimination or improper use of data beyond what local regulations might dictate.
Responsible Investing
We believe that business opportunities must be evaluated alongside the social and environmental challenges facing our world. This approach not only supports RGA's mission and purpose, but it also makes good, long-term business sense. RGA integrates a defined environmental, social, and governance investment philosophy into investment decisions to reflect company values and to promote the long-term health and financial security of communities and the environment. These issues increasingly influence traditional risk factors and can have significant impacts on long-term sustainability and resilience. Since its approval in 2021, this investment philosophy is being integrated into all of our investment decisions to reflect our company purpose, values, commitments, and belief that we have a responsibility to care for the long-term health and financial security of diverse communities and the environment.
We outlined this philosophy for all stakeholders with the publication of our 2022 Sustainability Report, in alignment with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures' ("TCFD") framework for corporate reporting on climate-related risks and opportunities. The report defines sustainability criteria within investment strategies, such as incorporating sustainability within bond investing and analyzing sustainable value in real estate investments and presents RGA's approach to responsible investing for sustainable development. The philosophy and goals outlined in the Sustainability Report, which included reducing the carbon intensity of the corporate bond portfolio and engaging with issuers on their sustainability efforts and increasing investments to support sustainable development goals, were reflected in the Investments team's activities in 2023. In 2021 we made progress toward our carbon intensity reduction. During 2022 we developed tools and methods for portfolio decomposition to better understand the sources of the carbon intensity on a portfolio, sector and individual level. In 2023, we were able to expand emission data coverage to nearly all of our corporate bond portfolio. By monitoring forward looking indicators of carbon risk our investment process of decarbonization has become more robust.
Political Contributions
We have established policies and procedures governing the political activities of the Company and the political action committee sponsored by our Missouri operating company, RGA Reinsurance Company. Due to our position as a leading U.S.-based reinsurer in the global life and health reinsurance industry, we actively follow state, federal and international legislation and regulation. On both the state and federal levels, we actively participate in lobbying in the interest of protecting the rights of reinsurance companies and in the pursuit of staying competitive in global markets. Internationally, we work with our trade associations to follow and address issues regarding market access and trade, data transfer and other issues that impact the manner in which we do business in foreign jurisdictions.
Like many large organizations, we have a federal political action committee, created and administered under applicable federal law. RGA Reinsurance Company sponsors the RGA Reinsurance Company Federal Political Action Committee ("RGA PAC"), a non-partisan PAC formed under the federal election laws, which makes contributions to individual candidates pursuant to federal election laws. In appropriate circumstances the RGA PAC may also make contributions to the federal political action committees of industry trade associations in which the Company participates. All contributions are made with the Company's strategic goals in mind and are intended to support candidates and issues that are important to the Company and our clients.
The board of the RGA PAC is comprised of Company employees who are members of the RGA PAC. The RGA PAC board regularly reviews the Company's political and lobbying policies and reports of political contributions. The RGA PAC board is advised of the Company's ongoing political strategy as it
relates to overall public policy objectives for the next year and provides guidance to the RGA PAC. The RGA PAC files contributions and expenditure reports with the Federal Elections Commission, pursuant to federal regulations.
Under United States federal law, the Company may not contribute corporate funds or make in-kind contributions to candidates for federal office or to national party committees. In addition, our Code of Conduct ensures that no Company funds or assets are used for any candidate or nominee for political office, or for any political party or committee, except in compliance with specific Company policies and all applicable laws and regulations. When permitted, the Company makes political contributions to insurance and reinsurance trade associations that are permitted to contribute to individual candidates at the state level who understand the issues most important to us and our clients. We are generally not permitted to make political contributions to candidates for public office in foreign countries and therefore we do not make any such contributions.
Other Governance Matters
Governance Policies
We believe that sound principles of corporate governance are a key element of our business, and the Board of Directors is deeply involved in providing continuing insight and clarity into our governance process. We expect all directors, officers and employees to conduct business in compliance with the various corporate governance documents and policies we have implemented and we survey compliance on an annual basis.
We have adopted the following governance policies and guidelines:
•a Code of Conduct, which applies to all employees and officers of the Company and its subsidiaries;
•a Directors' Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to directors of the Company and its subsidiaries;
•a Financial Management Code of Professional Conduct, which applies to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, primary financial officers in each business unit and all professionals in finance and finance-related departments; and
•Corporate Governance Guidelines, which applies to the entire Company.
We intend to satisfy any disclosure obligations under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K by posting on our website information about amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the Financial Management Code of Professional Conduct that applies to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Corporate Controller.
The Board of Directors has also adopted charters for the Audit, Cybersecurity and Technology, Human Capital and Compensation, Investment, Nominating and Governance, and Risk Committees, as well as the Transaction Review subgroup.
Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions
The Company does not have any agreements, transactions or any relationships with related persons such as directors, nominees, executive officers or immediate family members of such individuals. At least annually, we review all relationships between ourthe Company and our directors and executive officers and their immediate family members to determine whether such persons have a direct or indirect material interest in any transaction with us.
Our Global Legal Services staff is primarily responsible for developing and implementing processes and controls to obtain information from the directors, nominees and executive officers with respect to related person transactions. If such a transaction arose, our Global Legal Services staff would
determine, based on the facts and circumstances, whether we or a related person has a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction. As required under SEC rules, related person transactions that are determined to be directly or indirectly material to us arewould be disclosed in this Proxy Statement andthe proxy statement or other SEC filings.
OurThe Board has adopted a policy as part of its corporate governance guidelinesCorporate Governance Guidelines that requires advance approval by the Board before any of the following persons knowingly enter into any transaction with the Company or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates through which such person receives any direct or indirect financial, economic or other similar benefit or interest. The individuals covered by the policy include any:
director,• director;
• nominee for director,director;
• executive officer,officer;
• holder of more than 5% of our voting securities,common stock;
• immediate family member of such a person, as that term is defined in the policy,policy; and
•organization or charitable entity or organization affiliated with such person or any immediate family member of such person.
Transactions covered by the policy include any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, transaction, contribution or donation of goods or services, but excludes transactions with any charitable entity or organization affiliated with a director, nominee for director, executive officer, 5% security holder or any immediate family member of such a person if the amount involved is $2,500 or less. At this time, the Company is not involved in any transactions that would be covered by this policy.
Director Orientation and Continuing Education
Each new director participates in an orientation program which includes, among others, meetings with other Board members and our executive officers to become familiar with the Company's strategic plans, business segments and corporate functions, significant financial, accounting and risk management issues, and compliance and ethics programs and policies. New directors also meet with the Company's internal and independent auditors.
In addition, each director is expected to maintain the necessary level of expertise to perform the responsibilities of a director. Each director is encouraged to participate in periodic continuing education programs to assist the director in maintaining the necessary level of expertise. The Company maintains a director portal of information, which includes considerable resources for director professional development and a calendar of major events for virtual and in-person programs.
Communications with the Board of Directors
Any shareholder who wishes to communicate with any of the Company's directors, the Chair of the Board, committee chairs, or the independent directors as a group, may mail correspondence to the attention of the General Counsel and Secretary at the headquarters of the Company. The process for communicating with the Board requires that the Secretary make a record of the receipt of any such communications. All appropriate communications will be delivered to the specified recipient(s) in a timely manner.
15
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain the senior level employees who direct and lead our business and to appropriately reward these individuals for superior financial performance.their contributions to the business. Our Board of Directors has delegated to the Human Capital and Compensation Committee (the "Committee") the authority to establish and oversee our general compensation program, review the performance and approve the compensation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and review and approve the compensation of the other named executive officers and members of our senior management.management, including the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves this Compensation Discussion and Analysis on executive compensation("CD&A") for inclusion in this Proxy Statement (the "CD&A").Statement. During 2015,2023, the Compensation Committee consisted of Mses. McNeilage (Chair) and Albo, and Messrs. Danahy (Chairman), Eason, SievertNichols and Tulin and Ms. Phillips.
The discussion of our compensation practices and related disclosures focusThomas. Mr. Ng also served on the Committee until he retired from the board in May 2023.
Overview of Compensation Practices
2023 Named Executive Officers
Choosing the right leadership for the Company is among the Board's most important responsibilities and both the Board and the Committee are committed to ensuring the Company's leadership team has the right talent, with compensation programs aligned to our strategy and pay aligned to performance and the creation of long-term shareholder value. For 2023, our named executive officers. This discussion is divided into the following sections:
officers were as follows: | | | | | |
| 2023 Named Executive Officers |
| Name | Title |
Compensation Disclosure Sections |
OverviewAnna Manning | |
Five Elements of Compensation | |
Executive Compensation Process | |
2015 Compensation Actions and Results | |
Executive Compensation Tables | |
Other Executive Compensation Matters | |
OVERVIEW
2015 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
| |
Name | Title |
A. Greig Woodring | Chief Executive Officer since December 1, 2015
President and Chief Executive Officer fromuntil January 1, 2015 to November 30, 2015 4, 2023, and Chief Executive Officer thereafter |
Jack B. LayTodd C. Larson | Senior Executive Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer |
Anna ManningTony Cheng | President since December 1, 2015
Senior Executive Vice President, Structured Solutions fromHead of EMEA, Asia and Australia until January 1, 2015 to November 30, 2015
4, 2023, and President thereafter |
Alain P. NéemehLeslie Barbi | Senior Executive Vice President, Global Life and Health MarketsChief Investment Officer |
Donna H. KinnairdRonald Herrmann | Senior Executive Vice President, Head of U.S. and Chief Operating OfficerLatin American Markets until July 18, 2023, and Executive Vice President, Head of RGA Americas thereafter |
Ms. Manning retired on December 31, 2023, and Mr. Cheng assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer on January 1, 2024.
Our Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
The philosophy and objectives of our executive compensation programs are to:
Create•create incentives that will focus executives on, and reward for, increasing long-term shareholder value;
Reinforce•reinforce our pay for performance culture by making a significant portion of compensation variable and based on Company and business unit performance;
Align•align the long-term financial interests of our executives with thatthose of our shareholders through equity-based incentives and by building executive ownership in the Company; and
Provide•provide competitive total compensation opportunities that will attract, retain and motivate high-performing executives.
We use financial performance measures that focus on revenue, new business embedded value, operating income per share, book value per share, operating return on equity, relative return on equity and cumulative revenue growth rate. Our annual bonus plan and performance contingent share program are tied to financial and operating performance metrics and our stock appreciation rights are tied to the performance of the Company's stock price. This approach aligns our executive compensation program to our business strategies, reinforces our pay-for-performance culture by using variable compensation based on performance and aligns the long-term financial interests of our executives with the interests of our shareholders. For a more detailed discussion on performance metrics, see "Five Elements of Compensation" and "2015 Compensation Actions and Results."
Compensation Program and Governance Reflects Best Practices
We have designed our compensation program to drive performance toward achievement of our short, intermediate and long-term goals and to increase long-term shareholder value, while appropriately balancing risk and reward. We regularly review our program to incorporate bestappropriate compensation practices, such aswhich currently include the following:
|
| | | | |
| What We Do |
| ü | Pay-for-Performance.We have a pay-for-performance executive compensation structure that provides an appropriate mix of short, intermediate and long-term performance incentives, with emphasis on the creation of shareholder value. Our executive compensation is closely aligned with financial performance because the majority of the total compensation for our executives is earned only upon the achievement of corporate, business unit and/or individual performance goals. Other than base salary, we do not provide any fixed compensation. |
| ü | Use of Multiple Financial Performance Metrics.Our incentive compensation programs utilizeutilized multiple financial performance metrics, including revenue,adjusted operating income book value andper share, new business embedded value and adjusted operating revenue for our Annual Bonus Plan and cumulative revenue growth rate,adjusted operating return on equity and relative return on equitybook value per share excluding AOCI for our Performance Contingent Shares. These financial metrics are focused on performance and creation of long-term shareholder value. |
| ü | Compensation Benchmarking.Benchmarking with Reference to Median.The Compensation Committee reviews publicly available information of peer companies to evaluate how our named executive officers’officers' compensation compares to executives in similar positions at other companies and considers that information when establishing compensation. In most markets, we align our executive compensation target levels with the market median in order to retain current talent and attract new talent. |
ü
| Compensation Recoupment Policy.Policies.In 2023, we adopted a new NYSE Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy to comply with NYSE listing standards. The NYSE Executive Recoupment Policy requires the Company to clawback certain incentive compensation paid to certain current or former Company officers if the Company is required to restate any of its financial statements, irrespective of whether the restatement was the result of an act or omission by such officer. We havealso maintain an Executive Incentive Recoupment Policy which permits the Company to recoup all or a portion of an incentive award paid to certain executives upon the occurrence of a specifiedcertain recoupment event, including a financial restatement.events set forth in the policy. We have incorporated the provisions of this policyboth policies into our incentive plans.Flexible Stock Plan and award agreements. |
| ü | Stock Ownership Guidelines.To further align the long-term interests of our executives and our shareholders, we have robust stock ownership requirements for our executive officers. For additional information, see "Stock Ownership - Other Securities Ownership Information - Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines." |
| ü | Independent Compensation Consultant.The Compensation Committee benefits from its use of an independent compensation consulting firm which provides no other services to the Company. |
| ü | Annual Shareholder "Say on Pay." Because we value our shareholders’ input on our executive compensation programs, our BoardCommittee Discretion.The Committee has chosendiscretion to provide shareholders with the opportunity each year to vote to approve, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers in our proxy statement.
|
ü | Compensation Committee Discretion.We give our Compensation Committee full discretion toincrease, reduce or eliminate any cashAnnual Bonus Plan incentive award.
|
| ü | Programs Designed to Manage Dilution Efficiently.We design our long-term incentive programs to manage dilution through the use of stock-settled stock appreciation rights. |
| ü | Shareholder Value. We design our equity compensation programs to appropriately balance short, medium and long-term focus on key drivers of shareholder value creation. |
| | | | | |
| |
| What We Don't Do |
| X | No U.S. Employment Contracts.We do not have any employment or contractual pre-employment severance agreements for our executivesU.S. named executive officers and we only offer limited benefits on termination of employment. |
| X | NoLimited Perquisites.We do not offer our executives personal-benefitpersonal benefit perquisites, such as aircraft, cars or apartments and we do not reimburse our executives for personal benefit perquisites such as club dues or other social memberships, except in some foreign countries where such perquisites are required to maintain a local competitive position.
|
| X | No Preferential Payments. We do not pay preferential or above market returns on executive deferred compensation. |
| X | Limited Benefits Upon Change in Control. We have limited benefits upon change in control and our Flexible Stock Plan includes a double-trigger for the acceleration ofdoes not require that awards automatically accelerate upon a change in control. |
| X | No Repricing of Grants. Our Flexible Stock Plan prohibits repricing for underwater stock options and stock appreciation rights. |
| X | No Golden Parachutes or Gross-Ups.Gross-Ups. We do not have any golden parachute agreements or tax gross-ups for severance payments with our executives. |
| X | No Speculative Trading. Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits employees and directors from short-selling Company stock, buyingsecurities, and strongly discourages the use of standing and limit orders or selling puts and calls of Company stock, or engaging in any other transaction that reflects speculation aboutwhere there is no control over the Company’s stock pricetiming of purchases or that might place their financial interests againstsales which could result in a trade occurring at a time when the financial interestsemployee is aware of the Company.material non-public information or otherwise not permitted to trade. |
| X | No Unapproved Hedging.Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits employees, officers and directors from engaging in hedging or monetization transactions,of Company securities, which can be accomplished through a number of possible mechanisms, including through the use of financial instruments such as prepaid variable forwards,forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds. Exemptions to general ban may be sought from the General Counsel on a case-by-case basis and will be subject to pre-clearance procedures. |
| X | Pledging Discouraged.and Margin Accounts Prohibited. Our Insider Trading Policy discouragesprohibits employees, officers and directors from holding Company securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan. |
Say on Pay Feedback from Shareholders
A primary focus of our Compensationthe Committee is whether the Company’sCompany's executive compensation program serves the best interests of the Company’sCompany's shareholders. At the Company’s 2015Company's 2023 Annual Meeting, a significant majority (98.3%95% of votes cast on the proposal) of our shareholdersproposal approved the compensation program described in the proxy statement for that meeting. This is consistent with
| | |
| 2023 Say on Pay Votes |
| Percentage of Votes Cast in Favor of "Say on Pay" |
| 95% |
At the Company's 2022 Annual Meeting, 62% of votes cast on the proposal approved the compensation program described in the proxy statement for that meeting. As a result, the Company engaged in the extensive shareholder outreach efforts described in last year's proxy statement to obtain feedback from our shareholders. We adjusted our compensation structure and disclosures in light of that feedback. Prior to 2022, shareholder feedback on Say on Pay at our previous annual meetings:meetings was uniformly positive as reflecting in the following table:
|
| |
| Annual Meeting Year | Percentage of Votes Cast in Favor of "Say on Pay" |
| 2015 | 98% |
| 2014 | 97% |
| 2013 | 99% |
| 2012 | 96% |
| 2011 | 92% |
| | | | | |
| Annual Meeting Year | Percentage of Votes Cast in Favor of "Say on Pay" |
| 2021 | 95% |
| 2020 | 98% |
| 2019 | 98% |
| 2018 | 98% |
| 2017 | 98% |
| 2016 | 98% |
| 2015 | 98% |
| 2014 | 97% |
| 2013 | 99% |
| 2012 | 96% |
| Ten Year Average | 97.5% |
As part of its ongoing review of our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee took the votesshareholder feedback into consideration, along with an overall review of the compensation program, when making compensation decisions for 20152023 and 2016. The Compensation Committee determined that2024. As described in the Company’s executive"Item 2 - Shareholders' Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation" section above, we are asking our shareholders to approve the compensation philosophy, objectives and elements continue to be appropriate.
Five Elements of Compensation
Our executive compensation program consists of the named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, including this "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" and the "Compensation Tables". This non-binding vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of the named executive officers and the policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement.
The Board and the Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will carefully consider those shareholders' concerns when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers and will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
Compensation Pay Mix
The following five elements:graph demonstrates 2023 target compensation pay mix by elements* for each of our named executive officers:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| *Calculation excludes pension and retirement benefits. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Five Elements of Compensation and 2023 Actions |
| | Compensation Elements |
ElementOur compensation program consists of Compensation | Purposethe following five elements: |
| 1.Element | Form | Key Features |
| 1. | Base Salary | OurCash | ● | The only fixed compensation element, intended to attract and retain top talent. |
| ● | Generally, we target base salaries are designed to provide a competitive componentsalary around the median of our peer companies, but this varies with individual skills, experience, responsibilities, performance and location. |
| ● | Represents 19.4%* of the average named executive officer target total compensation package that will attract, retain and motivate high-performing executives. Adjustments to base salary are made periodically to recognize competitive changes and personal performance.for 2023. |
| 2. | Annual Bonus
Plan | OurCash | ● | Serves as an annual performance incentive to achieve established business goals. |
| ● | Tied to one or more of the following factors: overall Company performance, performance of the participant's division or business unit and individual performance. |
| ● | Performance goals established in the first quarter of each year with financial goals of each business unit aligning to corporate goals. |
| ● | Payouts range from 0% of target payout to 200% of target payout, depending on performance. |
| ● | The Annual Bonus Plan ("ABP") awards are designedcompany-wide objectives were measured using the following components: (i) adjusted operating income per share; (ii) strategic scorecard; (iii) new business embedded value and (iv) annual adjusted consolidated revenue. The strategic scorecard is an assessment of performance in four focus areas for 2023: alternative capital; Creation Re; cybersecurity and data loss prevention; and DEI. See page 43 for a description of those components. |
| ● | Represents 28.5%* of the average named executive officer target total compensation for 2023. |
| 3. | Performance
Contingent
Awards | Equity | ● | Serves as a performance incentive to reinforce our pay-for-performance cultureachieve established intermediate-term financial measures and align incentive compensationour executives' interests with those of our short-term business strategies by making an executive's entire ABP award variableshareholders. |
| ● | Performance goals established at the beginning of each three-year cycle and fully vest after three years. |
| ● | Payouts range from 0% of target payout to 200% of target payout, depending on Company performance. |
| ● | For 2022 and 2023 awards, the Company measured financial performance over a three-year period, consistent with historical practice. Performance is based on Company, business unit and/or individual performance. |
3. | Performance Contingent Shares | Our Performance Contingent Share ("PCS") grants focus participants on our strategic and intermediate-term financial and operating goals. PCS grants are awarded to participants with equity if we achieve the rate of cumulative revenue growth rate,(i) three-year average adjusted return on equity and (ii) three-year book value per share, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income, growth rate. Results may be modified up or down by a maximum of 10% based on three-year relative return on equity measures that are approved each year bytotal shareholder return. Targets established for the Compensation Committee when it considers annual grants. The2022 grant were adjusted for impacts of Long-Duration Targeted Improvements ("LDTI") under new GAAP accounting rules effective January 1, 2023. |
| ● | For the 2023 PCS grants, are ongoingPCS represents 100% of the long-term compensation grant for the CEO, 75% for the President and each year a new three-year cycle begins, giving us the opportunity to review and update performance measures60% for new grants. The three-year performance and reward period shifts participant focus and effort toward intermediate and longer-term sustained results.all other named executive officers. |
4.● | Performance contingent awards represented 38.3%* of the average named executive officer target total compensation for 2023. |
| 4. | Stock Appreciation RightsBased
Awards | Equity | ● | Intended to motivate performance, promote appropriate risk-taking, align our named executive officers' long-term interests with shareholders' interests and promote retention. |
| ● | Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs") are granted annually, and the number of SARs granted is basedappreciation rights vest 25% per year, on the grant recipient's position within the Company. The vesting schedule for SARs grants is four years, 25% of which vests at the endDecember 31 of each year. |
| ● | Restricted Share Units cliff-vest after a three year period. |
| ● | Restricted share units represented 5.6%* of the first four years. Upon vesting, the SARs are settled in the equivalent value of unrestricted shares of common stock. The SARs expire 10 years after the grant date.average named executive officer target total compensation for 2023. |
5.● | Stock appreciation rights represented 8.2%* of the average named executive officer target total compensation for 2023. |
| 5. | Retirement and Pension Benefits | Our retirement and pension benefits are designedDeferred Cash | ● | Intended to provide a competitive level of post-employment income as part of a total rewards package that permits ussupports our ability to attract and retain key members of our management. |
|
| ● | | | | |
See "Five Elements of Compensation" (page 23) for additional information. |
Compensation Pay Mix
The following graph demonstrates 2015 target compensation pay mix by elements for each of our named executive officers:
|
| | | | |
1 Excludes special grants made in December 2015 to Ms. Manning, Mr. Néemeh and Ms. Kinnaird. For additional information see "Additional Named Executive Officer Compensation" below.
|
|
2 Ms. Manning’s compensation mix reflectsIn the amounts she earned while in the position of SEVP, Structured Solutions from January 1, 2015 to November 30, 2015, before becoming President on December 1, 2015. For additional information see "Additional Named Executive Officer Compensation" below.
|
Company Performance for 2015
We believe that our compensation philosophy and objectives have resulted in an executive compensation program and decisions that have appropriately incented our executives to achieve our business performance targets, goals and objectives. Our compensation decisions are intended to benefit our shareholders and drive long-term shareholder value. Summarized below are some key highlights of our financial performance for 2015:
Our full year net premiums totaled $8.6 billion in 2015.
| |
• | Our full year earnings per diluted share: operating income1 $8.43, net income $7.46.
|
| |
• | Our full year operating return on equity1 was 11% for 2015.
|
Book value per share at year-end 2015 was $94.09 including accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI"), and $83.23 excluding AOCI, an 8% increase on a total return basis.
For additional information on our 2015 financial performance, see our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
| | | |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 61 for reconciliations to GAAP figures. |
How Our Performance Affected 2015 Compensation
Our emphasis on pay for performance and the alignment of compensation with the creation of long-term shareholder value means that significant portions of the compensation paid to our executives vary based on our corporate performance. Our financial results are reflected in our 2015 compensation
payments, as described below.
Annual Bonus Plan. Payouts were 101.9% of target for our named executive officers. Named executive officer ABP payouts are based on Company operating income per share, book value per share, new business embedded value and total revenue.
| ABP COMPANY-WIDE PERFORMANCE METRICS |
| | | | |
| Metric | Weight | Target | 2015 Result | Performance Level |
Operating Income Per Share1 | 50% | $8.60/share | $8.43/share | 85.8% |
Book Value Per Share Excluding AOCI1 | 25% | $84.76/share | $83.23/share | 82.0% |
| New Business Embedded Value | 15% | $400 million | $610 million | 200.0% |
| Annual Consolidated Revenues | 10% | $10.6 billion | $10.4 billion | 85.8% |
| Weighted Average | | | | 101.9% |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 61 for reconciliations to GAAP figures. |
Performance Contingent Share Program. For the 2013-2015 PCS performance period payouts are based on cumulative revenue growth rate, operating return on equity and relative return on equity performance over a three-year period. Our cumulative revenue growth rate and operating return on equity performance for the period resulted in payouts of 0.0% and 55.3% of target, respectively. The relative return on equity measure is dependent upon public availability of financial results from our peer companies. Because of the timing for the availability of this information our performance for the relative return on equity metric will not be approved by the Compensation Committee until late April 2016. Payments for the 2013-2015 PCS grants will not be made until May 2016, after the filing of this Proxy Statement.
| PCS COMPANY-WIDE PERFORMANCE METRICS |
| | | | |
| Metric | Weight | Target | 2015 Result | Performance Level |
| Cumulative Revenue Growth Rate | 33.0% | 8% | 3.5% | 0% |
Three-Year Operating Return on Equity1 | 33.5% | 11.5% | 10.2% | 55.3% |
| Three-Year Relative Return on Equity | 33.5% | 50th | Our performance for the relative return on equity metric for the 2013-2015 PCS grants will not be available until late April 2016. | Our performance for the relative return on equity metric for the 2013-2015 PCS grants will not be available until late April 2016. |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 61 for reconciliations to GAAP figures. |
Additional Named Executive Officer Compensation
On December 1, 2015, the Board of Directors appointed Ms. Manning as President of the Company. On such date, Mr. Woodring relinquished the title of President. The Board also announced that Mr. Woodring is expected to retire and relinquish the title of Chief Executive Officer in late 2016, at which time the Board expects to appoint Ms. Manning as Chief Executive Officer. On March 7, 2016, the Board of Directors appointed Todd C. Larson as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company effective May 1, 2016. On such date, Mr. Lay will relinquish the title of Chief Financial Officer.
In connection with these organizational changes, the following actions were taken:
Manning Offer Letter. Pursuant to an offer letter between the Company and Ms. Manning (the "Offer Letter"), she receives an annual base salary of $750,000 as President effective December 1, 2015,
which will increase to $950,000 upon her expected appointment as Chief Executive Officer. She will continue to participate in the Company’s ABP and her target bonus shall remain equal to 100% of her base salary as President, with potential payouts under this award ranging from zero to $1,500,000. New ABP goals were established for her in her role as President. Upon appointment to the role of Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Manning’s ABP target will increase to 130% of base salary.
The Offer Letter also provides that effective with the 2016 grant, Ms. Manning’s target long-term incentive compensation payout will be a fixed amount of $2,000,000 rather than a percentage of her base salary. Her 2016 grant will be allocated 75% to PCS and 25% to SARs awards. Upon appointment to the role of Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Manning’s long-term incentive program target will be $3,245,000.
Manning SAR Agreement. On December 1, 2015 the Committee awarded an additional grant of SARs to Ms. Manning valued at $3,000,000 (153,453 SARs) that will fully vest on November 30, 2020.
Néemeh and Kinnaird Award Agreements. On December 1, 2015, the Committee granted SARs to Mr. Néemeh valued at $2,000,000 (102,302 SARs), which vest fully on November 30, 2020. On that date the Committee also granted Restricted Share Units to Ms. Kinnaird. Ms. Kinnaird’s grant was valued at $600,000 (6,437 Restricted Share Units) and fully vests on January 11, 2017.
Larson Compensation Arrangements. Effective May 1, 2016, Mr. Larson will receive a salary of $500,000. He will continue to participate in the ABP and his target bonus will be 80% of his base salary beginning May 1. New ABP goals will be established for Mr. Larson as Chief Financial Officer and the amount of the potential payout for 2016 will be prorated for goals and amounts before and after May 1. Mr. Larson will continue to participate in the Company’s long-term incentive program. Effective with the 2016 grant his target long-term incentive compensation payout will be 120% of his base salary. His 2016 grant will be allocated 75% to PCS and 25% to SARs awards.
FIVE ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION
Compensation Elements
Our compensation program consists of the following five elements:
|
| | | | | |
Compensation element | | Purpose | | How We Determine This Amount |
1. | Base Salary | ● | Our base salaries establish a pay foundation at competitive levels as part of a total compensation package that will attract, retain and motivate talented executives.
| ● | The Compensation Committee considers our executives' base salary compensation compared to that of the Pay Level Peer Group and published surveys. |
| ● | The Compensation Committee also reviews the recommendations submitted by our Chief Executive Officer for the other named executive officers. |
2. | Annual Bonus Plan ("ABP") | | Our ABP awards are designed to motivate and reward executives for performance on key financial, strategic and/or individual objectives over the year. | ● | ABP awards for executives are based on annual Company results or on a combination of Company, business unit and individual performance results. |
●
| ● | Our ABP program utilizes multiple performance metrics. |
●
| This element of compensation holds our executives accountable for Company performance, with payouts varying from target based on actual performance against pre-established and communicated performance goals. | ● | Target awards for executives are based on competitive market pay data for their position and expressed as a percent of salary. |
● | Overall Company operating earnings per share performance must meet certain minimum levels, as determined in advance by the Compensation Committee, before any awards are made. |
3. | Performance Contingent Shares ("PCS") | ● | Our PCS program is designed to focus executives on our strategic and intermediate-term financial and operating goals. |
●
| The PCS units are granted at the beginning of the performance period. |
● | PCS grants are awarded to eligible participants on an annual basis with each grant cycle running for three performance years. | ● | The Compensation Committee sets award levels with a minimum level of Company performance that must be met before any payment to the individual can be made, as well as a target and a maximum. |
● | The PCS grants are ongoing and each year a new three-year cycle begins, giving us the opportunity to review and update performance measures for new grants. | ● | If we do not meet minimum performance goals, the awards will not be made, and if we exceed those performance goals, the award can be as much as 200% of the targeted award opportunity. |
● | The three-year performance and reward period shifts participant focus and effort toward intermediate and longer-term sustained results. | | |
4. | Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs") | ● | SARs are designed to align the interests of executives with our shareholders' by focusing the executives on long-term objectives over a multi-year period, including stock price growth. |
●
|
SARs are granted to executives at an award value divided by Black-Scholes’ value of the Company’s stock price.
|
● | SARs are granted annually and are based on the recipient's position. | ● | The strike price for the SAR is determined by the Company's closing stock price on the award date. |
● | SARs vest over a period of four years and upon vesting they are settled in the equivalent value of unrestricted shares of common stock. | ● | The annual SARs awards vest 25% per year beginning on December 31 of the year granted until fully vested and remain exercisable for up to 10 years from the award date. |
5. | Retirement and Pension Benefits | | |
●
| U.S. and Canadian retirement and pension benefits differ, but generally there are two types of plans: qualified plans and non-qualified plans. |
| ● | Provided as another competitive component of the total compensation package that permits us to attract and retain key members of our management. | ●
| Qualified plans are paidprovided to eligible associatesemployees up to specified maximum amounts as determined by federal tax authorities. |
| ● | | ●
| Non-qualified plans are provided to eligible associatesemployees who earn compensation above the maximum amounts established by federal tax authorities. |
| ● | Hong Kong retirement and pension benefits are split between: (i) a mandatory provident fund where employees and employer contribute up to a maximum amount and (ii) a supplementary fund for compensation in excess of the maximum amount applicable to the mandatory provident fund benefit. |
| *Calculation excludes pension and retirement benefits. Average percentages are rounded. |
The performance contingent awards and the stock-based awards described above collectively form the Company's long-term incentive ("LTI") plan. For 2023, the LTI was allocated as follows:
•100% PCS for Ms. Manning;
•75% PCS and 25% SARs for Mr. Cheng; and
•60% PCS, 20% RSUs and 20% SARs for all other named executive officers.
The structure of the 2023 LTI award for Ms. Manning took into consideration that 2023 was to be her last year as Chief Executive Officer.
Compensation Element #1 - Base Salary
The Compensation Committee begins its annual review of base salary for the executivesnamed executive officers and senior management through discussion with the CEO on the previous year's expectations and achievements for each executive and their pay history. Thehistories. In addition, the Committee additionally references the base salary pay levels as compared to similar pay level roles inat our Pay Level Peer Group.peer companies. The annual base salary determinations for executives are typically effective in the first quarter of each year onyear. Adjustments to base salary are made periodically to recognize competitive changes, personal performance or about March 1, followingchange in position or responsibilities.
In determining the executive's annualbase salaries of our named executive officers, the Committee considers internal equity, tenure, individual performance review, which
and our compensation compared to that of our peer companies, as well as published surveys. The Committee also considers recommendations submitted to it by our Chief Executive Officer for the other named executive officers.
23The Committee reviewed and approved the below base salaries for 2023, as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| 2023 Named Executive Officer Base Salaries |
| Name | Base Salary | Percentage Increase |
| Anna Manning | $1,100,000 | 6.8% |
| Todd C. Larson | $700,000 | 3.7% |
Tony Cheng1 | $750,000 | 17.5% |
| Leslie Barbi | $625,000 | 4.2% |
| Ronald Herrmann | $650,000 | 3.2% |
1Increase reflects Mr. Cheng's promotion to President. |
includes a discussion about individual results against defined expectations.
Compensation Element #2 - Annual Bonus Plan
Employees of the Company areAll full time and part time employees were eligible to participate in our 2023 Annual Bonus Plan ("ABP"), which provides annual cash incentive compensation based on one or more of the following factors: ourthe Company's overall performance, the performance of the participant’sparticipant's division, business unit or department and individual performance during the previous year. Under the ABP, participants may receive a cash bonus each year. Actual payouts are capped at 200% of target.
The ABP award is designed to serve as an annuala short-term incentive. The target-level financial performance goals established by the Compensation Committee are intended to require substantial efforts by our management team toward our strategic goals, while at the same time they are intended to be within reach if such efforts are made and provide additional rewards for extraordinary achievement. The Compensation Committee establishes ABP objectives for the Company during Februarybefore the end of the first quarter each year and determines results and awards in February of the following March.year.
In March 2023, the Committee approved the performance goals and business criteria for the named executive officers under the ABP financial objectivesfor 2023, including the minimum, target and maximum ABP
opportunities, as a percentage of base salary, as described below. The performance goals the Committee established were meant to require substantial efforts by our management team toward our strategic goals, but at the same time they were intended to be within reach if such efforts are made, and also provide additional rewards for extraordinary achievement. We believe that goals that are too difficult to attain would not tied to any peer group, but are instead tied solely to our financial performance objectives. ABP Company-wide objectives are measured usinghave the following components:effect of providing appropriate incentives.
2015 COMPANY-WIDE ANNUAL BONUS PLAN METRICS |
| | |
Component | Weight | Definition |
Operating Income Per Share1
| 50% | Operating income per share is our net income per share from continuing operations less realized capital gains and losses and certain other non-operating items. |
Book Value Per Share Excluding AOCI1
| 25% | Book value per share is the company's total equity (excluding AOCI) divided by total common stock outstanding. |
New Business Embedded Value | 15% | New business embedded value ("NBEV") is a measure of the value of the profits expected to emerge from new business net of the cost of supporting capital. NBEV is a forward-looking calculation that reflects the lifetime value created through new business sales. |
Annual Consolidated Revenues | 10% | Annual consolidated revenues is total revenues earned by the Company during the annual performance period. |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 61 for reconciliations to GAAP figures. |
TargetsThe targets established by the Committee reflect our annual goals for these metrics. The allocation of ABP awards between individual, business unit and Company-wideoverall Company performance varies for each participant and is based on his or her job responsibilities. In general, allocations for business unit, departmental and individual performance are weighted more heavily for employees with less Company-wideoverall Company responsibility. In contrast, allocations for Company-widethe Company's overall performance are weighted more heavily for senior executives because their roles involve greater Company-wide responsibility.
Business unit results Awards are based on a specific target percentage of salary, which varies for each business unit's financial performance metrics. Individual performance results are measured by progress on major projects, productivity, client development or similar goals in which the associate played a major role. While we intend to tie individual performance to clearly articulated and objective measures, it is necessary (and at times prudent) for management to use a certain degree of discretion in evaluating individual results.participant. Based on these criteria, the Compensation Committee approves a list of senior management participants, which includes (as applicable) individual incentive and/or business unit or division allocations, a minimum performance level that must be met before any payment can be made, as well as a target and a maximum. In addition, overall Company financial performance must meet certain minimum levels, as determined in advance by the Committee, before any awards (including any portion of an award based solely on individual performance) are made under the ABP. Awards
Business unit results are based on each business unit's financial performance metrics. While we intend to tie individual performance to clearly articulated and objective measures, it is necessary and at times prudent for management to use a specific target percentagecertain degree of salary, which varies for each participant.
discretion in evaluating individual results. We consider business unit and individual performance when evaluating total compensation and may (fromfrom time to time)time establish a specific ABP allocation for a particular business objective or project. The types of individual performance that may be taken into consideration include contributions toward revenue growth, earnings per share, return on equity capital, expense management, operational activities, risk management or product or client development, as well as (in certain cases) intangible items such as progress toward achievement of strategic goals, leadership capabilities, development of staff or progress on major projects in which the individual holds a key role.
In 2023, a Cyber Mindset goal was established to reinforce the criticality of data loss prevention and data protection and reflect the Company's increased focus on cybersecurity. The Cyber Mindset goal contained three metrics linked to ongoing Company-wide "phishing" simulations and timely notifications of terminations, all to further the Company's protection against cybercriminals and other bad actors. Results were measured at both Company and business unit or department levels. Every employee of the company except for Ms. Manning and Mr. Cheng had an ABP allocation for the Cyber Mindset goal in 2023.
The following metrics were used to measure the Company's 2023 overall performance in the Annual Bonus Plan:
1. Adjusted Operating Income Per Share (Weight: 50%). Adjusted operating income per share is our net income per share from continuing operations less realized capital gains and losses and certain other non-operating items.
In some circumstances, we modify the calculation of Adjusted Operating Income Per Share for purposes of the ABP to exclude standard adjustments. Standard adjustments vary from year to year and may have a net positive or negative impact on our results. The Committee has the discretion to amend compensation payable under the ABP and the Committee may exercise such discretion to reduce ABP compensation if it believes Company financial results do not appropriately represent Company performance and efforts or if payment would be misaligned with shareholder interests. We believe this creates better market alignment with the ABP design.
At the time metrics were approved, the Committee provided for adjustment of variable investment income (“VII”) outside a range of -50% to +50% of VII expected in our 2023 financial plan. As 2023 VII was within this range, no adjustment for VII was made.
2. Strategic Scorecard (Weight: 25%). The Strategic Scorecard is an annual assessment of accomplishments and progress on strategic non-financial goals in recognition of their importance to protecting, supporting, and enhancing the Company's brand, client partnerships, regulatory position, and other organizational objectives. It has an overall weight allocation of 25% of the Company ABP, with the individual goal weighting as detailed below:
| | | | | | | | |
| Strategic Scorecard Components |
| Component | Weight | Definition |
| Alternative Capital | 25% | This goal focuses on identifying and sourcing alternative capital as needed through a variety of methods to support RGA's growth ambitions, provide capital use flexibility, and maintain RGA's capital efficiency. |
| Creation Re | 25% | Recognizes high quality business that grows the underlying insurance market, increases penetration through the new use of reinsurance or increases our share of the reinsurance available. |
| Cybersecurity and Data Privacy | 25% | Build out capabilities & deliver on initiatives to continue to mitigate risks associated with cybersecurity or data privacy events and to bring our current measures in line with expected tolerances. Manage cyber risk, build a culture of privacy and security, and protect RGA's financial interests, brand, image, and client partnerships. |
| Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion | 25% | Implement our DEI Strategy to evolve RGA workplaces, specifically our talent practices, and the communities in which RGA has a presence into more diverse, equitable and inclusive environments. |
The Strategic Scorecard categories and Company performance in each category were evaluated on a 1-5 scale, with "3" as meeting expectations, "1" as fully missing expectations, and "5" as fully exceeding expectations. The Committee determined an overall performance result for each goal and the total scorecard based on input from management and all Board members. The Committee's recommendation also required endorsement from the Board.
3.New Business Embedded Value (Weight: 15%). New business embedded value ("NBEV") is a measure of the value of the profits expected to emerge from new business net of the cost of supporting capital. NBEV is a forward-looking calculation that reflects the lifetime value created through new business sales.
4. Adjusted Consolidated Revenue (Weight: 10%). Annual adjusted consolidated revenue is total revenues earned by the Company less any excluded transactions undertaken for capital management or risk management purposes during the annual performance period.
We also modify the calculation of Adjusted Consolidated Revenue for purposes of the ABP to exclude standard adjustments. Such standard adjustments vary from year to year and may have a net positive or negative impact on our results. For 2023, standard adjustments involved premiums related to single premium pension risk transfer transactions ("PRT").
The following table describes the adjustment to 2023 Adjusted Consolidated Revenues, for the purposes of ABP:
| | | | | |
| Adjusted Consolidated Revenue Calculation |
| (USD Millions) | 2023 |
| Adjusted Consolidated Revenues, as reported | $ | 18,567.0 | |
| Less PRT Premium Exclusion | 1,447.0 | |
| Adjusted Consolidated Revenues for ABP Purposes | $ | 17,120.0 | |
The following table describes 2023 ABP performance measures and results:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2023 Annual Bonus Plan |
| Performance Measures and Goals | Weight | Minimum | Target | Maximum | Numerical Results | Payout Percent |
Adjusted Operating Income Per Share1 | 50.0% | $12.10 | $15.13 | $18.15 | $19.88 | 100.0% |
| 80.0% | | 120.0% | | |
| Strategic Scorecard | 25.0% | 1.00 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 3.63 | 32.9% |
| 0.0% | 100.0% | 200.0% | | |
| New Business Embedded Value | 15.0% | $370.00 | $658.00 | $945.00 | $1,020.00 | 30.0% |
| 55.0% | | 145.0% | | |
| Adjusted Consolidated Revenue | 10.0% | $15,703.0 | $17,448.0 | $19,193.0 | $17,120.0 | 9.1% |
| 90.0% | | 110.0% | | |
| Payout | | | | | | 171.9% |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 86 for reconciliations from GAAP figures to adjusted operating figures. |
The following table describes the minimum, target and maximum ABP opportunities for the named executive officers (as a percentage of base salary) as approved by the Committee in November 2022, and the actual ABP payments for 2023 performance, as approved by the Committee in February 2024:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2023 Individual Annual Bonus Plan Results |
| Name | ABP Threshold1 | ABP Target1 | ABP Maximum1 | Target ABP Award in Dollars | Actual ABP Percentage of Target2 | Actual ABP Payment |
Anna Manning3 | 100% | 200% | 400% | $2,200,000 | 171.9% | $3,782,574 |
Todd C. Larson4 | 65% | 130% | 260% | $910,000 | 166.2% | $1,512,581 |
Tony Cheng5 | 75% | 150% | 300% | $1,125,000 | 171.9% | $1,934,269 |
Leslie Barbi6 | 100% | 200% | 400% | $1,250,000 | 174.0% | $2,174,600 |
Ronald Herrmann7 | 50% | 100% | 200% | $650,000 | 200.0% | $1,300,000 |
1Expressed as a percentage of base salary. |
2 The weighted average of the Company-specific ABP financial performance metrics for 2023 performance was 171.9% |
3Ms. Manning had ABP allocations based 100% on overall Company results. |
4Mr. Larson had ABP allocations based 50% on overall Company results, 45% based on departmental results (Finance) and 5% based on Cyber Mindset results for Finance and Corporate Development departments, as well as individual performance. |
5Mr. Cheng has ABP allocations based 100% on overall Company results. |
6Ms. Barbi had ABP allocations based 50% on overall Company results, 45% on departmental results (Investments) and 5% on Cyber Mindset results for Investments, as well as individual performance. |
7Mr. Herrmann had ABP allocations based 50% on overall Company results 45% on business unit results (US Markets) and 5% Cyber Mindset results for US Markets, as well as individual performance. Mr. Herrmann's 2023 ABP result was adjusted upward at the discretion of the Committee, based on the recommendation of the CEO, to account for the assumption of additional responsibilities during 2023. |
Compensation Element #3 - Performance Contingent SharesAwards
Our Performance Contingent Share ("PCS") grantsAwards are part of a performance-driven incentive program under our Amended & Restated Flexible Stock Plan.Plan ("Flexible Stock Plan"). The Flexible Stock Plan provides for the grant of performance contingent shares ("PCS"), stock options, stock appreciation rights ("SARs"), restricted stock, restricted stock units ("RSUs") and other stock-based awards, as well as cash awards, to our employees. Executives in leadership or senior management roles, or thatwho are considered top subject matter experts within our Company, participate in this program. We believe this
Our PCS program focuses participants onrepresents a significant portion of target compensation for our strategicnamed executive officers and intermediate-term financial and operating goals. Incentive awards are intended to reflect each participant's involvement in our performance and to encourage their continued contribution to our future. We view intermediate incentive awards as an important means of aligning the economic interests of management and shareholders.
for other senior executives. The PCS grants are designed to allow us to reward the achievement of specific intermediate-term corporate financial performance goals with equity that is earned on the basis of Company performance.
We implemented the PCSour performance contingent award program because we believe it is consistent with our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy and achieving the financial performance necessary to increase shareholder value. We believe that the PCS grants require management to focus on intermediate-term growth and return on equity, while the SARs and RSUs are designed to focus attention on accomplishment of long-termlonger-term goals that influenceand the creation of long-term shareholder value. We
The Committee annually evaluateevaluates the appropriate mix of pay elements in comparison to the market to remain competitive in our compensation practices and to best support our strategy. We also annually review the performance metrics to ensure they accurately align compensation with our intermediate-term goals and make changes or adjustments to such metrics when appropriate.
The PCS units are granted at the beginning of the performance period. The Compensation Committee also sets award levels with a minimum level of Company performance that must be met before any payment to the individual can be made, as well as a target and a maximum. We use linear interpolation to determine the percentage of the target when performance falls between the minimum, target or maximum performance levels. If we do not meet minimum performance goals, payouts under the awards will not be made. If we exceed those performance goals, payouts under the award can be as much as 200% of the targeted award opportunity. The awards are also contingent uponAs the participant’s employment status with us atCommittee considers the end of the three-year performance period.
PCS grants are not treated as outstanding shares until the performance goals over the three-year performance period are met and awards are made as determined and approved by the Compensation Committee. Awards are made in units of fully-vested, unrestricted common stock. As we consider the targetsfinancial objectives for a particular performance period, wetargets are set the targets at amounts or ranges that are generally consistent with our publicly disclosed growth rate goals.
We measure The Committee believes that achievement of the targets will require a high level of financial and operating performance and the goals and ranges established for theall PCS grants usingare challenging but achievable.
PCS grants are not treated as outstanding shares until the following components:performance results over the three-year performance period are calculated and payouts under the awards are made as determined and approved by the Committee. Payouts are made in common stock. Payment is also contingent upon the participant's employment status with the Company at the end of the three-year performance period.
2015 PCS COMPANY-WIDE PERFORMANCE METRICS |
| | |
Component | Weight | Definition |
Cumulative Revenue Growth Rate | 33.0% | Cumulative revenue growth rate is the compounded average growth rate of the Company's consolidated revenue over the three-year performance period using the Company's annual consolidated revenue for the fiscal year immediately preceding the date of grant as the base year. |
Three-Year Operating Return on Equity ("ROE") | 33.5% | ROE is calculated as operating income divided by average shareholders’ equity excluding Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI") for the three-year performance period. Operating income and equity excluding AOCI are non-GAAP financial measures.1
|
Three-Year Relative Return on Equity ("Relative ROE") | 33.5% | Relative ROE is the percentile ranking of the Company's ROE relative to the ROE of competitor companies in the Performance Peer Group over the same three-year performance period. |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 61 for reconciliations to GAAP figures. |
As discussed below under "Executive Compensation Process - Competitive Marketplace Assessment," the Committee determines a target total compensation package for our named executive officers based on an analysis of competitive market conditions and overall Company performance. Accordingly, the Committee does not consider individual performance to a material extent in determining the size of PCS and SARs awards. However, allAll participants are required to maintain an acceptable level of performance to be eligible to receive equity incentive awards. 2021-2023 PCS Awards
For the 2021-2023 PCS program, the Committee established specific financial performance metrics for each of 2021 and 2022, with 2023 serving as an additional time vesting period. PCS grants prior to 2021 measured financial performance over a three-year period, but due to the COVID-19 pandemic, uncertain business environment and the inability at the time to reasonably determine metrics for a three-year plan given the pending implementation of LDTI in 2023, the Committee altered the measurement period for the 2021 grants only.
2021-2023 PCS Performance Metrics (Measured in each of 2021 and 2022 only) | | | | | | | | |
| Component | Weight | Definition |
Adjusted Operating Return on Equity1 | 33.5% | This metric is is calculated as adjusted operating income for the applicable year divided by average adjusted stockholders' equity. Adjusted stockholders' equity represents total stockholders' equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income. The average of adjusted stockholders' equity will use monthly data points during the one-year evaluation period. |
Adjusted Operating Income1 | 33.5% | This metric is calculated for the applicable year as net income excluding substantially all of the after-tax effect of net investment related gains and losses, changes in the fair value of certain embedded derivatives and related deferred acquisition costs, any net gain or loss from discontinued operations, the cumulative effect of any accounting changes occurring after the targets have been established, and other items that management and the Committee believes are not indicative of the Company's ongoing operations. |
Book Value per Share, Excluding AOCI1 | 33.0% | This metric is defined as adjusted stockholders' equity for the applicable year divided by the end of period outstanding shares of the Company's common stock. Adjusted stockholders' equity represents total stockholders' equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI"). Book value per share and adjusted stockholders' equity excluding AOCI are non-GAAP financial measures. |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 86 for reconciliations from GAAP figures to adjusted operating figures. |
In February 2023, the Committee reviewed the results for the 2021 and 2022 performance periods and determined: (i) for 2021, Adjusted Operating Return on Equity and Adjusted Operating Income did not meet minimum threshold levels and Book Value per Share, Excluding AOCI exceeded target; and (ii) for 2022, Adjusted Operating Return on Equity, Adjusted Operating Income and Book Value per Share, Excluding AOCI exceeded their respective targets. The following table describes the goals established in March 2021 and actual results:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2021-2023 Performance Contingent Share Metrics | | |
| 2021 Performance Measure | Weight | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Actual | Payout Percent |
Adjusted Operating Return on Equity1 | 33.5% | 2.7% | 5.7% | 7.2% | 0.08% | 0% |
Adjusted Operating Income1 ($M) | 33.5% | $258.2 | $516.3 | $645.4 | ($80.5) | 0% |
Book Value Per Share, Excluding AOCI1 | 33.0% | $122.18 | $135.75 | $142.54 | $139.53 | 51.4% |
| 2021 Total Result | | | | | | 51.4% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2022 Performance Measure | Weight | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Actual | Payout Percent |
Adjusted Operating Return on Equity1 | 33.5% | 7.9% | 9.4% | 10.9% | 10.3% | 55.1% |
Adjusted Operating Income1 ($M) | 33.5% | $675.0 | $900.0 | $1,125.0 | $986.1 | 46.3% |
Book Value Per Share, Excluding AOCI1 | 33.0% | $129.93 | $144.37 | $151.59 | $146.22 | 41.4% |
| 2022 Total Result | | | | | | 142.9% |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" (pre-LDTI adoption) on page 91 for reconciliations from GAAP figures to adjusted operating figures. |
The total performance factor for the 2021-2023 PCS performance metric was 97.2% which represents the average of the 2021 and 2022 results. The third year of these grants arerepresents time vesting only and payouts were made in the first quarter of 2024.
2022-2024 PCS Awards
In March 2022, the Committee eliminated the Adjusted Operating Income metric from PCS grants to remove overlap with the same metric in the Annual Bonus Plan. The Company uses two remaining metrics to measure PCS performance — three-year book value per share, excluding AOCI, growth (50%) and average operating return on equity (50%). Additionally, the Committee added a Relative Total Shareholder Return modifier to PCS awards, recognizing both the prevalence of relative total shareholder return metrics among the Company's peers and the importance of measuring the
Company's performance against its peers. The Committee believes the addition of this modifier better aligns the Company's long-term incentive compensation program with market practices and reflects broader competition for investor capital. As such the metrics for PCS grants for the 2022-2024 performance period are:
2022-2024 PCS Performance Metrics
| | | | | | | | |
| Component | Weight | Definition |
Book Value per Share, excluding AOCI, Growth ("BVPS Growth")1 | 50.0% | BVPS Growth for each Performance Cycle is defined as the average of the annual growth rates in book value per share, excluding AOCI, for each year in the performance cycle. |
Average Operating Return on Equity ("Average ROE")1 | 50.0% | Average ROE for each Performance Cycle is defined as the average "Adjusted operating return, excluding standard adjustments, on equity (ex AOCI) - trailing 12 months" for each of the three years of the Performance Cycle. Standard adjustments identified are actuarial assumption reviews (e.g., mortality, morbidity, and lapse assumption changes and their impact on reserves and the carrying value of deferred acquisition costs), variable investment income outside of a range of -50% to +50% of income on these investments included in the three-year plan, and integration costs or other adjustments related to merger and acquisition activity. Standard adjustments represent a positive or negative impact to adjusted operating income. |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 86 for reconciliations from GAAP figures to adjusted operating figures. |
The Company's Relative Total Shareholder Return ranked against an established group of companies modifies the results of the above metrics up or down by a maximum of 10%. The established group of companies is different from the Company's general compensation peer group and includes life and health insurance peers that respond similarly to the macroeconomic environment. Companies in this group are: Aflac Incorporated, American Equity Investment Life Holding Company, Brighthouse Financial, Inc., CNO Financial Group, Inc., Globe Life Inc., iA Financial Corporation Inc., Lincoln National Corporation, Manulife Financial Corporation, MetLife Inc., Primerica, Inc., Principal Financial Group, Inc., Prudential Financial, Inc., Sun Life Financial Inc., and Unum Group.
The Committee may remove a company from the established group due to events that have a substantial impact on its business, including bankruptcy, insolvency, merger or similar events that significantly change the operational scope of the company.
The target grants reflected significant uncertainty regarding future development of the COVID-19 pandemic, the response thereto and related impacts on expected Company performance. At the time of these grants, the COVID-19 Omicron variant was in its emergent phase and longer-term population or industry projections were not generally available. The Company modeled a range of potential population impacts for 2022, 2023 and 2024 with assumptions about infection rates, lethality and vaccination protection. Population impacts were translated based upon the Company's exposures and the material prior period claims impacts to the Company's operations. The Company estimated that it incurred approximately $1.4 billion and $310 million of COVID-19 related impacts for the year ended December 31, 2021 and the first quarter ended March 31, 2022, respectively.
Additionally, pursuant to the terms of these grant agreements the Committee was required to adjust the target metrics for impacts of the implementation of LDTI under new GAAP accounting rules effective January 1, 2023. The following table describes the goals established in March 2022, as adjusted for impacts of LDTI:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2022-2024 Performance Contingent Share Metrics |
| Performance Measure | Weight | Minimum | Target | Maximum |
Book Value per Share, excluding AOCI, Growth ("BVPS Growth")1 | 50.0% | 2.4% | 4.7% | 5.9% |
Average Operating Return on Equity ("Average ROE")1 | 50.0% | 6.2% | 8.8% | 10.1% |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 86 for reconciliations from GAAP figures to adjusted operating figures. |
2023-2025 PCS Awards
In March 2023, the Committee established the targets and ranges for the following PCS performance measures: (i) three-year adjusted operating return on equity and (ii) three-year book value per share, excluding AOCI, growth. These results may be modified up or down by a maximum of 10% based on three-year relative total shareholder return. These measures were set for the period beginning in 2023 at levels that are consistent with our Flexible Stock Plan and award agreements. Upon retirement,intermediate term-goals for each measure. The performance period for the 2023 PCS grant began on January 1, 2023, and will be pro-rated basedend on the number of months of the grant holder’s participation during the three-year performance period and the number of shares earned, provided that the holder has attained age 55 and a combination of age and years of service with the Company that equals at least 65.December 31, 2025.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2023-2025 Performance Contingent Share Metrics |
| Performance Measure | Weight | Minimum | Target | Maximum |
Book Value per Share, excluding AOCI, Growth ("BVPS Growth")1 | 50.0% | 5.0% | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Average Operating Return on Equity ("Average ROE")1 | 50.0% | 9.5% | 11.0% | 12.5% |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 86 for reconciliations from GAAP figures to adjusted operating figures. |
| | | | | |
| 2023 PCS Awards | |
| Name | Number of PCS Granted |
Anna Manning1 | 53,130 |
| Todd C. Larson | 8,804 |
| Tony Cheng | 11,182 |
| Leslie Barbi | 5,421 |
| Ronald Herrmann | 4,229 |
1Ms. Manning's 2023 long-term incentive compensation was weighted 100% to PCS. |
Compensation Element #4 - Stock Based Awards
Stock Appreciation Rights
Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs") are granted annually under our Flexible Stock Plan andto executives in leadership or senior management roles, or to employees considered top subject matter experts within the Company. The number of SARs granted annually is based on the grant recipient’srecipient's position and level of responsibility within the Company. As discussed below under "Executive Compensation Process - Competitive Marketplace Assessment," theThe Committee considers compensation data of the Pay Level Peer Groupour peer companies and published surveys in determining the amounttotal target compensation, inclusive of SARs granted to our named executive officers and considers market data from published surveys in determining the amountother participants. We believe this program focuses participants on our strategic and financial goals while aligning our executives' interests with those of SARs granted to other participants.our shareholders and promoting retention. For more information on our peer companies, see "Executive Compensation Process - Competitive Marketplace Assessment."
The vesting schedule for SARs grants is four years, 25% of which vests on December 31 of each of the first four years. The grant value of a SAR is equal to the NYSE closing price of the Company’sCompany's common stock on the grant date of the award (i.e., the date of the March 2015 Compensation Committee meeting)meeting at which the Committee approves the grants), multiplied by a Black-Scholes Model factor (which calculates the current economic value of a SAR using assumptions that include exercise price, the term of the award, a risk-free rate of interest, dividend yield and observed market volatility). Upon vesting, the SARs become exercisable by recipients and upon exercise are settled in the equivalent value of unrestricted shares of common stock. The SARs expire 10 years after the grant date.
In March 2023, the Committee approved the 2023 annual Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs") awards for our named executive officers and other company executives. The vesting schedule for the annual SARs grant is four years (vesting 25% at the end of each year). We made these grants because we believe that SARs are an appropriate vehicle for providing long-term value to participants because of the alignment to long-term shareholder value. The SARs granted on March 9, 2023 have a strike price of $138.34, which was the closing price of our stock on the date the grants were approved. See "Compensation Tables - Executive Compensation Tables - Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2023" for a description of the 2023 annual SARs grants. The following table describes the 2023 annual SARs awards for the named executive officers, granted on March 9, 2023:
2023 SAR Grants | | | | | |
| Name | Number of SARs Granted |
Anna Manning1 | — |
| Todd C. Larson | 8,602 |
| Tony Cheng | 10,924 |
| Leslie Barbi | 5,297 |
| Ronald Herrmann | 4,131 |
1Ms. Manning's 2023 long-term Incentive compensation was weighted 100% to PCS, and thus she did not receive any SARs for 2023. |
Restricted Stock Units
The Company grants restricted stock units ("RSUs") to executives in leadership or senior management roles, or to employees considered top subject matter experts within our Company under our Flexible Stock Plan. The number of RSUs granted annually is based on the grant recipient's position and level of responsibility within the Company. The Committee considers compensation data of our peer companies and published surveys in determining the total target compensation, inclusive of RSUs, granted to our named executive officers and other participants. We believe this program aligns our executives' interests with those of our shareholders and promotes retention. RSUs vest on December 31st of the third year from grant. Upon retirement, provided thatvesting, the participant has attained age 55RSUs are settled in unrestricted shares of common stock.
In March 2023, the Committee approved the 2023 annual Restricted Share Unit ("RSU") awards for our named executive officer and a combination of age andother company executives. The cliff-vesting schedule for the annual RSU grant is three years of servicefrom January 1, 2023. The RSU awards will fully vest for individuals employed with the Company that equals at least 65,on December 31, 2025 and pay out in shares of the SARs continue to vest in accordance withCompany's common stock.
The following table describes the vesting schedule.2023 annual RSU awards for the named executive officers, granted on March 9, 2023:
2023 RSU Grants | | | | | |
| Name | Number of RSUs Granted |
Anna Manning1 | — |
| Todd C. Larson | 2,935 |
Tony Cheng2 | — |
| Leslie Barbi | 1,807 |
| Ronald Herrmann | 1,410 |
1Ms. Manning's 2023 Long-Term Incentive compensation was weighted 100% to PCS, and thus she did not receive any RSUs for 2023. |
2Mr. Cheng's 2023 Long-Term Incentive compensation was weighted 75% to PCS and 25% to SARs, and thus he did not receive any RSUs for 2023. |
Compensation Element #5 - Retirement and Pension Benefits
We recognize the importance of providing comprehensive and cost-effective employee benefits to attract, retain and motivate employees. We offer our executives market competitive retirement programs as described below, including adefined contribution savings plans, traditional defined benefit and hybrid defined benefit pension plan, augmented plan, savings planplans and aan executive deferred savings plan. The Company reviews its retirement and pension benefits programs from time to time and makes adjustments to the design of the programs as necessary to meet these objectives and to remain competitive. Because our named executive officers are eitherresidents of or previously accrued benefits in the United States, or Canadian residents,Canada and Hong Kong, we have described the benefits in boththose jurisdictions below.
Qualified and Registered Plans - U.S.
Savings Plan. U.S. basedU.S.-based employees of the Company may participate in a qualified 401(k) plan and make pre-tax, orRoth and after-tax (Roth) elective deferrals to the plan ("Savings Plan"). Employees may contribute up to the maximum allowed by the U.SU.S. Internal Revenue Code. In compliance with the U.S. Internal Revenue Code for 2023, contributions to the Savings Plan cannot be made on cash compensation in excess of $330,000 and employee contributions were limited to a maximum of $40,500 ($22,500 plus an additional $7,500 for those 50 years of age and older, plus $10,500 in after-tax contributions). The Company provides matching contributions on elective deferrals up to 5% annually. The Company also providesannually, as well as a 5% fixed employer contribution for employees hired in 2020 or later. Employees hired before 2020 receive a 2% fixed employer contribution to employees who work 1,000 hours and are employed on December 31. In compliance with the U.S. Internal Revenue Code for 2015, contributionsat year end in addition to the Savings Plan could not be made on cash compensation in excess of $265,000 and employee contributions were limited to $18,000.
Pension Plan. U.S. based employees, including ourcertain named executive officers, participate in the RGA Performance Pension Plan ("Pension Plan"), a qualified defined benefit plan. The Pension Plan is a broad-basedwidely available retirement plan thatfor all full-time employees hired before January 1, 2020, and is intended to provide a source of income for employees during retirement. The Pension Plan provides a "Traditional Benefit," that is paid exclusively in the form of an annuity, and a "Performance Pension Account Benefit," that is generally paiddefined as a lump-sum, butlump sum account balance payable on or after termination of employment. The account balance may be paid asconverted to an actuarial equivalent annuity if the participant has met the retirement plan eligibility of a minimum of ten-years’ service and a minimum age of 55. The Traditional Benefit is provided to participants who were employed prior tobenefit. Employees hired before January 1, 1996, with the sum of age and years of service equaling at least 45. Participants employed after January 1, 19962020 are eligible forto participate in the "Performance Pension Account Benefit" only.
Messrs. Woodringpension plan and Lay meet the eligibility to obtain the "Traditional Benefit" for service years prior to January 1, 1996 and the "Performance Pension Account Benefit" for service years thereafter. Ms. Kinnaird is eligible to receiveaccrue benefits under the Performance Pension Account Benefit only. The benefit payable for life at(subject to the age 65 for Messrs. Woodring and Lay is the sum of (a) and (b) below; the benefit payable for Ms. Kinnaird at age 65 is as described in (b) below:
(a) Traditional Benefit: The sum of (1) and (2) as follows:
(1) 1.05% of the participant’s Final Average Monthly Compensation (as defined below) multipliedservice requirements required by the number of years of Accrual Service (as defined below) as of the date of determination, subjectplan to a maximum of 35 years, plus
(2) 0.65% of the excess, if any, of the Participant’s Final Average Monthly Compensation minus one-twelfth of the Participant’s Social Security Maximum Wage Average (as defined below), multiplied by the number of years of Accrual Service as of the date of determination, subject to a maximum of 35 years.
(b) Performance Pension Account Benefit: The sum of (1) and (2) as follows:
(1) Participants earn base credits for each year of accrual service completed under the plan. The credit is a percentage of base salary and the target ABP award basedbegin participation). Employees hired on the participant’s age onor after January 1, of2020 are not eligible to participate in the Pension Plan year, as shown in the table below:
PERFORMANCE PENSION ACCOUNT BENEFITS |
| |
Age on January 1 of the
Plan Year in which
the Year of Service is Earned
| Percentage of Final
Average Annual
Compensation Credited
|
Up to 35 | 2% |
35 – 44 | 4% |
45 – 54 | 6% |
55 or over | 8% |
(2) Additional base credits are earned on Final Average Annual Compensation (as defined below) that is greater than 60% of the prevailing Social Security Wage Base (as defined below), rounded to the next $100. Additional credits are always half of the base credits, as illustrated in the table below:
ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE PENSION ACCOUNT BENEFITS |
| |
Age on January 1 of the
Plan Year in which
the Year of Service is Earned
| Additional Credits |
Up to 35 | 1% |
35 – 44 | 2% |
45 – 54 | 3% |
55 or over | 4% |
Payment of the specified retirement benefits is contingent upon continuation of the plans in their present form until the officer retires.
"Final Average Annual Compensation" means the average of compensation received during 5 consecutive years of accrual service within the last 10 calendar year period immediately preceding termination of employment which produces the highest average (or during all the years of accrual service if less than 5). "Year of Accrual Service" means a year is credited for each plan year after employee becomes a plan participant, in which the participant is credited with at least 1,000 hours of service. "Social Security Wage Base" means the 35-year average of the maximum amount of compensation on which the Social Security benefits are based according to year of birth and assuming the participant has always received wages at least equal to those subject to tax under FICA (Federal Insurance Contributions Act). "Social Security Maximum Wage Average" means the average of the Social Security Wage Base in effect for each calendar year during the 35-year period ending with the calendar year in which a participant attains the Social Security retirement age.
Qualified and Registered Plans - Canada
Registered Pension Plan. All permanent Canadian associates are required to join the defined contribution plan on their date of hire.
Each associate is required to contribute, by payroll deduction, an amount equal to 5% of their annual earnings (base salary and cash bonus earned). The Company contributes, on behalf of each associate, an amount equal to the required contribution of the associate (5%), up to 50% of the maximum allowable limit per calendar year as set under the Canadian Income Tax Act. For 2015, the maximum allowable limit for combined employer and associate contributions is CAD$25,370. Employer contributions are immediately vested.
Company and associate contributions are locked-in benefits (cannot be accessed by the associate) until an associate retires at age 55 or later. Voluntary contributions made by the associate over and above the required contribution level are permitted under the plan and the associate may withdraw such funds at any time.
A deferred or immediate life annuity contract may be purchased whereby the associate can transfer the value of the benefit to another registered pension plan, a registered retirement savings plan (if conditions are met as stipulated by applicable legislation) or any form of registered retirement income fund.Plan.
Non-qualified and Supplemental Plans - U.S.
Non-qualified Augmented Plan. The Company's Augmented Benefit Plan ("Augmented Plan") is designed to restore benefits lostunavailable in the qualified Savings Plan and Pension PlansPlan due to IRS compensation limitations for qualified plans, which was $265,000$330,000 for 2015. In order for an associate's retirement income provided under the plans to be based on total eligible cash compensation, the2023. The Augmented Plan provides U.S. based executives at the vice president level and above benefits based on an associate'semployee's annual cash compensation,
in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code. Additionally, theThe Augmented Plan provides executives the opportunity to receive employer matching, and employer non-elective contribution
credits, and additional pension plan credits without regard to qualified Planplan limitations imposed by the IRS;IRS.
The Augmented Plan has two components: a 401(k) Savings component and alla Pension component. All contributions to the planAugmented Plan are made by the Company.
The matching contribution credits in the 401(k) Savings component of the Augmented Plan are only made if an employee's compensation for the year has not otherwise been matched with a credit in the Executive Deferred Savings Plan. The investment fund alternatives in the savings portion of the Augmented Plan are identical to the options in the qualified Savings Plan, withexcept the exception of theAugmented Plan includes a fixed rate option, thatwhich offers a fixed interest rate set at the beginning of the plan year. We credit the associate's non-qualified deferred compensation account with the returns he or she would have received in accordance with the investment alternatives selected from time to time by the associate. We doThe Company does not pay above-market or preferential earnings, compensation or returns under the Augmented Plan or any other plan. Distributions from the Augmented Plan cannot be made until the participant terminates his or her employment.is no longer employed by the Company.
Non-qualified Executive Deferred Savings Plan. U.S. associatesemployees at the vice president level and above are eligible to participate in our Executive Deferred Savings Plan ("EDSP"), a non-qualified savings plan which allows associatesemployees to defer income, including annual bonuses,ABP payments, without regard to qualified plan limitations. Eligible associatesFor the 2023 plan year, eligible employees are able to defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100%75% of their Annual Bonus PlanABP payments.
The Company credits EDSP accounts with matching contributions equal to the matching contributions unavailable to the associate could not receiveemployee under the SavingSavings Plan (100% of total deferrals up to 5% of compensation in 2016)2023) due to IRS compensation limits in the Savings Plan. The named executive officerslimits. Employees cannot withdraw any amounts from EDSP balances until they either terminate employmentare no longer employed by the Company or until they reach the designated distribution date selected by the executiveemployee at the time of their deferral election. With respect to these distributions, participants may elect to receive either a lump-sum payment or 1 toannual installments paid out over a period lasting between 2 and 15 annual installments.
years. The investment fund alternatives under the EDSP are identical to those in the Savings Plan, withexcept the exception of theEDSP includes a fixed rate option, thatwhich offers a fixed interest rate set at the beginning of the plan year. We credit the participant’s non-qualified deferred compensation account(s) with the returns he or she would have received in accordance with the investment alternatives selected from time to time by the associate. We doThe Company does not pay above-market or preferential earnings, compensation or returns under EDSP or any other plan.
OfNamed Executive Officer Status. As of the non-qualifiedcompletion of 2023:
•Ms. Manning met the vesting requirements of the pension plans and was therefore eligible to receive her Performance Pension Account benefits in both the U.S. Pension Plan and the Augmented Benefit Plan upon the termination of her employment with the Company. Ms. Manning met the vesting requirements of the savings plans and was therefore eligible to receive the savings account benefits from the U.S. Savings Plan, the Augmented Benefit Plan and the EDSP upon the termination of her employment with the Company. Ms. Manning also met the vesting requirements of the Supplemental Payment (described below) upon the termination of her employment with the Company.
•Mr. Woodring participates exclusivelyLarson and Mr. Cheng met the vesting requirements of the pension plans and are therefore eligible to receive their Performance Pension Account benefits in both the U.S. Pension Plan and the Augmented Benefit Plan upon their termination of employment with the Company. Mr. Larson and Mr. Cheng also met the vesting requirements of the savings plans and are therefore eligible to receive the savings account benefits from the U.S. Savings Plan, the Augmented Benefit Plan and the EDSP upon the termination of their employment with the Company.
•Ms. Barbi and Mr. Herrmann met the vesting requirements of the savings plans and are therefore eligible to receive the benefits from the U.S. Savings Plan, the Augmented Benefit Plan and the EDSP upon the termination of their employment with the Company.
Manning Supplemental Payment Agreement. As previously disclosed, the Company agreed to provide a supplemental payment (the "Supplemental Payment") to Ms. Manning upon her retirement from the Company, as an acknowledgment of the financial implications on her retirement benefits with respect to her relocation to the U.S. from Canada in 2016. The Supplemental Payment is designed to
supplement the post-retirement benefits she will receive under the Company's U.S. and Canadian retirement and savings plans to provide her with an aggregate financial value comparable to that which she would have received under the Company's U.S. retirement and savings plans had she worked in the Augmented Plan and Mr. Lay and Ms. Kinnaird participateU.S. for her entire career.
The Supplemental Payment will represent the difference between (i) the value of the Company-provided benefits that she would have received upon her retirement had she worked her entire career (starting upon her hire date in 2007 through retirement) in the AugmentedU.S., and (ii) the Executive Deferred Savings Plans.value of Company-provided benefits that she will actually receive upon retirement from the Company. For this purpose, Company-provided benefits include any savings, pension or deferred compensation benefits funded by the Company based on her deferrals of pay, additional details regarding executive participationnon-elective contributions to company retirement accounts and any subsequent investment returns credited to those deferred compensation accounts based on contributions from the Company. The value of any salary deferrals by Ms. Manning, including any subsequent investment return credited to those retirement accounts for those salary deferrals, is not included in our retirement plans, see "Compensation Tablesthe calculation of the Supplemental Payment. The Supplemental Payment will be payable in July 2024 as a single lump sum in the amount of $1,778,646.
Canadian Plans
Registered Pension Plan. All permanent Canadian employees are required to join the defined contribution plan on their date of hire. Each employee is required to contribute, by payroll deduction, an amount equal to 6% of their annual earnings (base salary and Other Matters -ABP payments), up to 50% of the maximum allowable limit per calendar year as set under the Canadian Income Tax Act. The Company contributes, on behalf of each employee, an amount equal to the required contribution of the employee, up to 50% of the maximum allowable limit per calendar year as set under the Canadian Income Tax Act. Employer contributions are immediately vested. Ms. Manning previously participated in the Registered Pension Benefits in 2015."Plan before her relocation to the U.S., and she continued to maintain an accumulated balance of past employee and employer contributions.
Non-qualified and Supplemental Plans - Canada
Defined Benefit Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. RGA offersThe Company offered a defined benefit Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("DB SERP") in Canada to associatesemployees at the vice president level and above who are approved by senior management. This plan is closed to new participants. An associateemployee must also participate in the Registered Pension Plan in order to participate in the DB SERP. Benefits are payable atThe DB SERP offers a traditional defined benefit annuity to participants based on the time an associate leavesaverage of their highest five consecutive years of compensation that is above certain compensation thresholds set out in the Company.plan. The DB SERP benefit is calculated onusing a number of factors including the associate’semployee's years of credited service and average pensionable earnings, each determined on the date the associateemployee ceases to be an executive in Canada or leaves the Company. Benefits are payable at the time an employee leaves the Company. Ms. Manning participated in the DB SERP until her relocation to the U.S. in April 2016. Ms. Manning's accrued benefit in the DB SERP was deferred until her retirement.
An associate who retires on or after age 60Named Executive Officer Status. As of the completion of 2023, Ms. Manning met the vesting and has completedearly retirement eligibility requirements under the Registered Pension Plan and the DB SERP.
Supplemental Retirement Plan - Hong Kong
The Company offers a supplemental retirement plan to all full-time regular employees in Hong Kong. The plan includes both a mandatory contribution component under the Hong Kong Mandatory Provident Fund ("MPF") system and a voluntary contribution as a supplementary retirement benefit provided by the Company. Under the plan, both the Company and Hong Kong employees are each required to make regular mandatory contributions calculated at least 55% of the employee's relevant income to an MPF plan, subject to the minimum and maximum relevant income levels. The maximum relevant income level is capped at HKD 30,000 per month in 2023. In addition to the mandatory portion, the Company makes contributions at a total of 10.8% of the base remuneration, up to a maximum amount, less any mandatory employer contributions. The maximum amount for calculating the contributions is
set at HKD 2.5 million per annum. The benefit is subject to a vesting schedule associated with years of uninterrupted employmentcontinuous service with the Company shall be entitled to receive an annualCompany. The Hong Kong supplementary allowance. The allowance isretirement plan has a non-indexed pension that does not increase with inflation. The annual supplementary allowance payable10-year graded vesting period. Contributions to the associate is paid over a ten-year term. All benefits underMPF plan are not be available to employees until they reach age 65 or until they depart Hong Kong. Contributions to the SERPsupplementary retirement fund are subject to applicable withholding taxthe vesting period and reporting pursuantcan be withdrawn upon termination of employment.
Named Executive Officer Status. Mr. Cheng participated in the Hong Kong supplementary retirement benefit during 2023 and received contributions under the plan up until his transfer to the Canadian Income Tax Act and any other applicable law.
An associate may elect to retire at age 50, provided the associate has completed at least 5 yearscompletion of uninterrupted employment with the Company, and subject to a reduction of 0.33% for each month by which the associate retires before age 60.
Both Ms. Manning and2023 Mr. Néemeh participateCheng no longer is an active participant or account holder in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. For additional details regarding
2024 Compensation Actions
In October 2023, the Committee approved compensation for 2024 as outlined below. The Committee approved allocation of Long-Term Incentive compensation to each named executive participationofficer in March 2024.
The Committee approved the following changes to base salary:
| | | | | | | | |
| 2024 Named Executive Officer Base Salaries |
| Name | Base Salary | Percentage Increase |
Tony Cheng1 | $950,000 | 26.7% |
| Todd C. Larson | $725,000 | 3.6% |
| Leslie Barbi | $650,000 | 4.0% |
| Ronald Herrmann | $675,000 | 3.8% |
1Increase reflects Mr. Cheng's promotion to Chief Executive Officer. |
The Committee approved the following ABP opportunities as outlined in the table below. Beginning in 2024 the Annual Bonus Plan will utilize an enterprise pool plan design. The Company will use a top-down pool design, where funding is driven by performance against key financial and non-financial metrics at the Company level. Financial metrics include adjusted operating income per share, new business embedded value and total revenues. The Company will continue to utilize a strategic scorecard to capture and evaluate key non-financial goals. The Committee will continue to approve both the annual goals and the payout results.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2024 Annual Bonus Plan Opportunities |
| Name | ABP Threshold | ABP Target | ABP Maximum |
| Tony Cheng | 87.5% | 175% | 350% |
| Todd C. Larson | 65% | 130% | 260% |
| Leslie Barbi | 100% | 200% | 400% |
| Ronald Herrmann | 65% | 130% | 260% |
| | | | | |
| 2024 PCS Awards | |
| Name | Number of PCS Granted |
| Tony Cheng | 24,996 |
| Todd C. Larson | 6,809 |
| Leslie Barbi | 4,736 |
| Ronald Herrmann | 5,465 |
The Committee established the target and ranges for the following PCS performance measures: (i) three-year adjusted operating return on equity and (ii) three-year book value per share, excluding AOCI. These results may be modified up or down by a maximum of 20% based on three-year relative total shareholder return. The total shareholder return modifier was increased from 2023 in order to continue to strengthen alignment of long-term incentive compensation with the experience of our retirement plans, see "Compensation Tablesshareholders. These measures were set for the period beginning in 2024 at levels that are consistent with our intermediate term-goals for each measure. The performance period for the 2024 PCS grant began on January 1, 2024, and Other Matters - Pension Benefitswill end on December 31, 2026.
2024 SARs and RSU Grants
The Committee approved the 2024 annual SARs and RSU awards for the named executive officers, as outlined in 2015."the table below. The vesting schedule for the 2024 SARs grant is ratable over three years (vesting one-third at the end of each year). The vesting schedule for the 2024 RSU grant is ratable over three years (vesting one-third at the end of each year).
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROCESS | | | | | | | | |
| 2024 SARs and RSU Grants |
| Name | Number of SARs Granted1 | Number of RSUs Granted1 |
| Tony Cheng | 22,719 | — |
| Todd C. Larson | 6,188 | 2,270 |
| Leslie Barbi | 4,305 | 1,579 |
| Ronald Herrmann | 4,967 | 1,822 |
1 Mr. Cheng will receive 25% of his 2024 LTI awards in stock appreciation rights. Ms. Barbi, Messrs. Larson and Mr. Herrmann will receive 20% of their 2024 LTI awards in stock appreciation rights and 20% in restricted stock units. |
Executive Compensation Process
The Role of the Compensation Committee
Our executive compensation program is evaluated and approved by the Compensation Committee with the objective of providing incentive-based compensation that aligns with the business goals of the Company and the interests of itsour shareholders. The Compensation Committee also determines the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") (Ms. Manning during 2023 and Mr. Cheng as President and CEO thereafter) and evaluates and approves the compensation for the executive officersmembers of senior management of the Company, including our named executive officers.
TimingCanadian Plans
Registered Pension Plan. All permanent Canadian employees are required to join the defined contribution plan on their date of Compensation Decisions
We typically releasehire. Each employee is required to contribute, by payroll deduction, an amount equal to 6% of their annual earnings for the fourth quarter in late January(base salary and ABP payments), up to 50% of the following year. In 2015,maximum allowable limit per calendar year as set under the Compensation Committee met in early MarchCanadian Income Tax Act. The Company contributes, on behalf of each employee, an amount equal to approve the regular grants of SARs and PCS awards. Equity grants are effective on and have a grant daterequired contribution of the same dayemployee, up to 50% of the maximum allowable limit per calendar year as set under the Committee meeting,Canadian Income Tax Act. Employer contributions are immediately vested. Ms. Manning previously participated in the Registered Pension Plan before her relocation to the U.S., and she continued to maintain an accumulated balance of past employee and employer contributions.
Defined Benefit Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. The Company offered a defined benefit Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("DB SERP") in Canada to employees at the vice president level and above who are approved by senior management. This plan is closed to new participants. An employee must also participate in the Registered Pension Plan to participate in the DB SERP. The DB SERP offers a traditional defined benefit annuity to participants based on the average of their highest five consecutive years of compensation that is above certain compensation thresholds set out in the plan. The DB SERP benefit is calculated using a number of factors including the employee's years of credited service and average pensionable earnings, each determined on the date the employee ceases to be an executive in Canada or leaves the Company. Benefits are payable at the time an employee leaves the Company. Ms. Manning participated in the DB SERP until her relocation to the U.S. in April 2016. Ms. Manning's accrued benefit in the DB SERP was deferred until her retirement.
Named Executive Officer Status. As of the completion of 2023, Ms. Manning met the vesting and early retirement eligibility requirements under the Registered Pension Plan and the strike price for grants of SARs isDB SERP.
Supplemental Retirement Plan - Hong Kong
The Company offers a supplemental retirement plan to all full-time regular employees in Hong Kong. The plan includes both a mandatory contribution component under the NYSE closing price of our common stock onHong Kong Mandatory Provident Fund ("MPF") system and a voluntary contribution as a supplementary retirement benefit provided by the dayCompany. Under the plan, both the Company and Hong Kong employees are each required to make regular mandatory contributions calculated at 5% of the Committee meeting. This timing and process is designedemployee's relevant income to ensure that our fourth quarter earnings information is fully disseminatedan MPF plan, subject to the market by the time the SARs strike priceminimum and maximum relevant income levels. The maximum relevant income level is determined. The PCS awards are measured by financial performance over a three-year period and the market price of our common stock is not a factorcapped at HKD 30,000 per month in those calculations or measures.
The Compensation Committee approves compensation for executive officers at its regularly scheduled meeting in March of each year. All compensation and incentive awards are made in consideration of market pay competitiveness and in comparison to Pay Level Peer Group.
Compensation Consultant
In forming its recommendations on our overall compensation program, the Committee has, from time to time, engaged an independent consulting firm to provide advice about competitive compensation practices and to determine how our executive compensation compares to that of other comparable companies, including selected publicly held insurance and reinsurance companies. Steven Hall & Partners ("SH&P") currently serves as independent advisor to the Compensation Committee. The Committee directly engaged SH&P to advise and assist with decisions relating to our executive compensation program, including providing advice regarding incentive plan design, annual comprehensive competitive market studies, competitive compensation data for directors, technical advice on disclosure requirements relating to executive compensation and to apprise the Compensation Committee of compensation best practices. Annually, SH&P conducts an evaluation of the Pay Level Peer Group and a competitive marketplace assessment of our named executive officers, which includes a comparison to our Pay Level Peer Group. SH&P also periodically conducts a review of our incentive plans to ensure a competitive position. Other than work for the Compensation Committee, SH&P provides no other services to the Company or its affiliates. Additionally, the Company’s Compensation Committee determined no conflicts of interest exist which would prevent SH&P from serving as independent advisors to the Compensation Committee.
Management Participation and Involvement in Compensation Decisions
Pursuant to the Compensation Committee charter, the Committee reviews and approves the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, other named executive officers and senior management. Management plays a significant role in the compensation-setting process for the named executive officers (other than the CEO), senior management and all other employees. No member of management is involved in determinations regarding their own pay. The most significant aspects of management’s role are:
evaluating employee performance;
recommending business performance targets, goals and objectives; and
recommending salary levels, cash bonus and equity incentive award targets.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Human Resources Officer work with the Compensation Committee chair to establish the agenda for Committee meetings. The Company also prepares relevant information and reports for each Compensation Committee meeting. Our Chief Executive Officer also participates in Compensation Committee meetings at the Committee’s request to provide:
background information regarding our strategic objectives;
an evaluation of the performance of the senior management and direct reports; and
compensation recommendations as to senior management and direct reports.
Our executives and other members of management are also made available to SH&P or any other compensation consultant to provide information regarding position descriptions, compensation history and other information as requested, and to review draft results provided by SH&P.
Competitive Marketplace Assessment
We use three groups of companies to evaluate our compensation practices for purposes such as pay levels, pay design and performance comparisons.
2015 PAY LEVEL PEER GROUP |
| | |
Purpose: | We use the Pay Level Peer Group to evaluate the overall competitiveness of our compensation packages, as well as individual elements of compensation. |
How Peer Companies are Chosen: | We use a group comprised of companies based on industry and size that are appropriate comparators for purposes of evaluating the competitiveness of our pay levels. The selected companies are publicly-traded insurers and reinsurers (life and property-casualty) and other financial services companies, including direct competitors. |
Last Evaluated: | In 2015, SH&P performed a comprehensive assessment of this group to determine the continued appropriateness of each constituent. |
Peer Group Members: | American Financial Group, Inc. | PartnerRe Ltd. |
American National Insurance Co. | Principal Financial Group, Inc. |
Assurant, Inc. | StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. |
CNO Financial Group, Inc. | Sun Life Financial, Inc. |
Everest Re Group Ltd. | The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. |
Genworth Financial, Inc. | Unum Group |
Lincoln National Corp. | |
2015 PAY DESIGN PEER GROUP |
| | |
Purpose: | The Pay Design Peer Group is used to evaluate market practices with respect to types of pay vehicles utilized, incentive compensation program designs, performance metrics and pay mix. |
How Peer Companies are Chosen: | We use the companies in the Pay Level Peer Group, as well as eight additional companies that were deemed inappropriate comparators for purposes of evaluating pay levels due to size, but which the Compensation Committee believes are useful sources of competitive intelligence regarding pay design and practices. |
Last Evaluated: | In 2015, SH&P performed a comprehensive assessment of this group to determine the continued appropriateness of each constituent. |
Peer Group Members: | Aflac, Inc. | Munich Re |
American Financial Group, Inc. | PartnerRe Ltd. |
American National Insurance Co. | Principal Financial Group, Inc. |
Assurant, Inc. | Prudential Financial, Inc. |
CNO Financial Group, Inc. | StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. |
Everest Re Group Ltd. | Sun Life Financial, Inc. |
Genworth Financial, Inc. | Swiss Reinsurance Co. Ltd. |
Kemper Corporation | The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. |
Lincoln National Corp. | Torchmark Corporation |
Manulife Financial Corp. | Unum Group |
Metlife, Inc. | |
2015 PERFORMANCE PEER GROUP |
| | |
Purpose: | The Performance Peer Group is used to evaluate our relative performance for purposes of determining incentive compensation paid. |
How Peer Companies are Chosen: | For comparisons of our performance among companies in the life insurance and reinsurance industry, we exclude most companies in the property and casualty business because their return profile is not a good comparator; however, we retain two large, global multi-line (property-casualty and life) competitors because they are among the companies against whom we measure our performance and returns. |
Last Evaluated: | In 2015, SH&P performed a comprehensive assessment of this group to determine the continued appropriateness of each constituent. |
Peer Group Members: | Aflac, Inc. | Principal Financial Group, Inc. |
American National Insurance Co. | Prudential Financial, Inc. |
Assurant, Inc. | StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. |
CNO Financial Group, Inc. | Sun Life Financial, Inc. |
Genworth Financial, Inc. | Swiss Reinsurance Co. Ltd. |
Lincoln National Corp. | The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. |
Manulife Financial Corp. | Torchmark Corporation |
Metlife, Inc. | Unum Group |
Munich Re | |
2015 Peer Group Changes
In February 2015, the Compensation Committee made modifications to the three peer groups used for evaluation of compensation levels and practices as follows:
Phoenix Companies, Inc. was removed from all peer groups due to lack of timely public filings.
Protective Life Corp. was removed from all three peer groups after it was acquired by Dai-Ichi Life Insurance in 2014.
Torchmark Corporation was removed from the Pay Level peer group due to its size falling below that specific peer group’s parameter for the second consecutive year. Torchmark Corporation remains in the Pay Design and Performance peer groups as size is not a determining factor in the construction of those groups.
The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. was added to all three peer groups, as it falls within the size and industry parameters for the Pay Level peer group and is considered a peer company by shareholder advisory firms.
Sun Life Financial, Inc. was added to the Pay Level peer group as it falls within the size and industry parameters and is considered a peer company by shareholder advisory firms. Sun Life was previously part of the Pay Design and Performance peer groups.
We plan to continue to review and update these lists periodically in order to ensure that comparators remain appropriate in light of evolving best practices with respect to peer group determinations, mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, growth in our size and the size of those companies in the comparator groups and other changes which might affect the appropriateness of a particular comparator.
How We Use Peer Group Data
When making determinations in 2015 relating to base salary, target total cash compensation, intermediate and long-term incentives and target total direct compensation for our named executive officers, we used the competitive compensation analysis provided by SH&P as the beginning reference point. This analysis included a review and assessment of publicly disclosed proxy data for companies in our Pay Level Peer Group as well as publicly available survey data. While we do not explicitly benchmark our pay levels to particular percentiles, we generally reference the market median when evaluating market practice.2023. In addition to the mandatory portion, the Company makes contributions at a reviewtotal of 10.8% of the competitive compensation data provided by SH&P, we also considered individual performance, internal pay equity among positions and levels andbase remuneration, up to a maximum amount, less any mandatory employer contributions. The maximum amount for calculating the relative importancecontributions is
set at HKD 2.5 million per annum. The benefit is subject to a vesting schedule associated with years of positions. We believe that the compensation strategy we established aligns our target compensationcontinuous service with the market medianCompany. The Hong Kong supplementary retirement plan has a 10-year graded vesting period. Contributions to the MPF plan are not be available to employees until they reach age 65 or until they depart Hong Kong. Contributions to the supplementary retirement fund are subject to the vesting period and should allow uscan be withdrawn upon termination of employment.
Named Executive Officer Status. Mr. Cheng participated in the Hong Kong supplementary retirement benefit during 2023 and received contributions under the plan up until his transfer to retain our current talent and attract new talent.the U.S. As of the completion of 2023 Mr. Cheng no longer is an active participant or account holder in the Supplemental Retirement Plan.
2015 COMPENSATION ACTIONS AND RESULTS
2024 Compensation Element #1 - Base SalaryActions
In determiningOctober 2023, the base salariesCommittee approved compensation for 2024 as outlined below. The Committee approved allocation of ourLong-Term Incentive compensation to each named executive officers, the Compensation Committee considers our compensation compared to that of the Pay Level Peer Group, as well as published surveys. The Compensation Committee also considers recommendations submitted to it by our Chief Executive Officer for the other named executive officers.officer in March 2024.
In February 2015, based on a marketplace assessment, our compensation strategy, our goals for and analysis of targeted overall compensation and Company performance, we increased the 2015 base salary for A. Greig Woodring, our Chief Executive Officer, by approximately 2% to $1,080,000. Based upon quantitative results, the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer and our subjective evaluation of individual performance, theThe Committee approved the following changes to base salaries for 2015 for the named executive officers as listed below. Effective December 1, 2015, in light of Ms. Manning's promotion to President, her salary was increased to $750,000. Additionally, in February 2016, the Compensation Committee established base salaries for the named executive officers set forth below. Because Mr. Larson will be our Chief Financial Officer effective May 1, 2016 and thus will be a named executive officer in our 2017 proxy statement, we have included his base salary in the table below and in the relevant disclosures below describing 2016 compensation.
salary:
33 | | | | | | | | |
| 2024 Named Executive Officer Base Salaries |
| Name | Base Salary | Percentage Increase |
Tony Cheng1 | $950,000 | 26.7% |
| Todd C. Larson | $725,000 | 3.6% |
| Leslie Barbi | $650,000 | 4.0% |
| Ronald Herrmann | $675,000 | 3.8% |
1Increase reflects Mr. Cheng's promotion to Chief Executive Officer. |
| 2015 AND 2016 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER BASE SALARIES |
| | | | |
| Name | 2015 Percentage Increase | 2015 Base Salary | 2016 Percentage Increase | 2016 Base Salary |
| A. Greig Woodring | 2% | $1,080,000 | 0% | $1,080,000 |
| Jack B. Lay | 3% | $621,950 | 3% | $639,950 |
| Anna Manning | N/A | $750,0001 | 0% | $750,000 |
| Alain P. Néemeh | N/A | $550,000 | 3% | $566,500 |
| Donna H. Kinnaird | 3% | $566,500 | 2% | $577,850 |
| Todd C. Larson | N/A | N/A | N/A | $500,0002 |
1 Salary as of December 1, 2015 2 Salary as of May 1, 2016 |
Compensation Element #2 - Annual Bonus Plan ("ABP")
2015Annual Bonus Plan Awards. In February 2015, the CompensationThe Committee approved the performance goals and business criteria for the named executive officers under thefollowing ABP for 2015, including the minimum, target and maximum bonus opportunities as a percentage of base salary, as describedoutlined in the table below. Overall Company financial performance must meet certain minimum levels, as determinedBeginning in advance by2024 the Compensation Committee, before any awards are made. The target-level performance goals we established were meant to require substantial efforts by our management team toward our strategic goals, but at the same time they were intended to be within reach if such efforts are made, and also provide additional rewards for extraordinary achievement. We believe that goals that are too difficult to attain would not have the effect of providing appropriate incentives.
|
| | | | |
| 2015 COMPANY ANNUAL BONUS PLAN RESULTS |
| Metric | Weight | Target | 2015 Result | Performance level |
Operating Income Per Share1 | 50% | $8.60/share | $8.43/share | 85.8% |
Book Value Per Share Excluding AOCI1 | 25% | $84.76/share | $83.23/share | 82.0% |
| New Business Embedded Value | 15% | $400 million | $610 million | 200.0% |
| Annual Consolidated Revenues | 10% | $10.6 billion | $10.4 billion | 85.8% |
| Weighted Average | | | | 101.9% |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 61 for reconciliations to GAAP figures. |
In March 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the ABP awards for our named executive officers for 2015 performance. All our named executive officers had ABP allocations based solely on overall Company results, the weighted average of the ABP measures for 2015 performance was 101.9%.
The following table describes the minimum, target and maximum bonus opportunities for the named executive officers (as a percentage of base salary) as approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2015, and the actual ABP payments for 2015 performance, as approved by the Committee in March 2016:
|
| | | | | |
| 2015 INDIVIDUAL ANNUAL BONUS PLAN RESULTS |
| Name | 2015 Bonus at Threshold | 2015 Bonus at Target | 2015 Bonus at Maximum | Actual Bonus Percentage for 2015 | Actual Bonus Payment for 2015 |
| A. Greig Woodring | 65% | 130% | 260% | 132.6% | $1,431,875 |
| Jack B. Lay | 50% | 100% | 200% | 101.9% | $634,302 |
| Anna Manning | 50% | 100% | 200% | 101.9% | $560,923 |
| Alain P. Néemeh | 50% | 100% | 200% | 101.9% | $560,923 |
| Donna H. Kinnaird | 50% | 100% | 200% | 101.9% | $577,751 |
2016Annual Bonus Plan will utilize an enterprise pool plan design. The Company will use a top-down pool design, where funding is driven by performance against key financial and Opportunities.The 2016 ABP objectives for Messrs. Woodring, Lay, Néemeh and Larson and Ms. Manning and Kinnaird will be tied solely to overallnon-financial metrics at the Company performance, measured 50% on annual Operating Incomelevel. Financial metrics include adjusted operating income per share, 25%new business embedded value and total revenues. The Company will continue to utilize a strategic scorecard to capture and evaluate key non-financial goals. The Committee will continue to approve both the annual goals and the payout results.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2024 Annual Bonus Plan Opportunities |
| Name | ABP Threshold | ABP Target | ABP Maximum |
| Tony Cheng | 87.5% | 175% | 350% |
| Todd C. Larson | 65% | 130% | 260% |
| Leslie Barbi | 100% | 200% | 400% |
| Ronald Herrmann | 65% | 130% | 260% |
| | | | | |
| 2024 PCS Awards | |
| Name | Number of PCS Granted |
| Tony Cheng | 24,996 |
| Todd C. Larson | 6,809 |
| Leslie Barbi | 4,736 |
| Ronald Herrmann | 5,465 |
The Committee established the target and ranges for the following PCS performance measures: (i) three-year adjusted operating return on equity and (ii) three-year book value per share, excluding AOCI, 15% on NBEV and 10% on Operating Revenue (see below), with awardsAOCI. These results may be modified up or down by a maximum of 20% based on a specified percentagethree-year relative total shareholder return. The total shareholder return modifier was increased from 2023 in order to continue to strengthen alignment of salary. In addition, overall Company earnings per share performance must meet certain minimum levels, as determined in advance by the Compensation Committee, before any awards are made.
Commencinglong-term incentive compensation with the 2016 plan year, the Compensation Committee approved replacing the annual consolidated revenues metric with Operating Revenue, a non-GAAP financial measure, as a basis for establishing target levels and awards under the ABP. The Company believes that Operating Revenue better measures the underlying trendsexperience of our continuing operations and management actions, primarily because it may exclude certain transactions undertaken for capital management or risk management purposes (such as retroceded blocks of business). In certain circumstances, the Compensation Committee may exclude such transactions from target amounts and/or results of Operating Revenue in determining annual payouts under the ABP.
In March 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the performanceshareholders. These measures and bonus opportunities for the 2016 ABP.
|
| | | |
| 2016 ANNUAL BONUS PLAN OPPORTUNITIES |
| Name | 2016 Bonus at Threshold | 2016 Bonus at Target | 2016 Bonus at Maximum |
| A. Greig Woodring | 65% | 130% | 260% |
| Jack B. Lay | 50% | 100% | 200% |
| Anna Manning | 50% | 100% | 200% |
| Alain P. Néemeh | 50% | 100% | 200% |
| Donna H. Kinnaird | 50% | 100% | 200% |
Todd C. Larson1 | 40% | 80% | 160% |
1 As of May 1, 2016 |
Compensation Element #3 - Performance Contingent Shares ("PCS")
2012-2014 PCS Results. In February 2012, we established the target and range for cumulative revenue growth rate, three-year operating ROE and three-year Relative ROEwere set for the period beginning in 2012 at levels that were consistent with our intermediate-term goals for those measures. The payout results for the 2012-2014 PCS grants were determined in late April 2015 and payments were made in May 2015. The following table describes the PCS payouts for the 2012-2014 performance period:
| 2012-2014 PERFORMANCE CONTINGENT SHARE PAYOUT |
| | | | |
| | Name | Percentage Payout | Number of Shares Acquired on Payout | Value Realized on Payout |
| |
| | A. Greig Woodring | 82.0% | 16,653 | $1,537,405 |
| | Jack B. Lay | 82.0% | 4,997 | $461,323 |
| | Anna Manning | 82.0% | 3,259 | $300,871 |
| | Alain P. Néemeh | 82.0% | 3,259 | $300,871 |
| | Donna H. Kinnaird | 82.0% | 3,457 | $319,150 |
2013-2015PCS Results. In February 2013, we established the target and range for cumulative revenue growth rate, three-year operating ROE and three-year Relative ROE for the period beginning in 2013 at levels that were consistent with our intermediate-term goals for those measures. As a result, at the time of grant, we believed that achievement of the target cumulative revenue growth rate and operating return on equity would require a high level of financial and operating performance. We believed the goals and ranges we established for these grants of PCS were challenging but achievable.
The performance period for the 2013 PCS grant began on January 1, 2013 and ended on December 31, 2015. In March 2016, we reviewed the results for the 2013-2015 performance period and determined that our cumulative revenue for the three-year period did not meet threshold performance level. Our ROE exceeded threshold but did not reach the target performance level. Because the relative return on equity measure is dependent upon public availability of financial results from our peer companies, our performance for the relative return on equity metric will not be approved by the Compensation Committee until late April 2016, after the filing of this Proxy Statement. Payments will be made in May 2016. These payments will be fully disclosed in our 2017 Proxy Statement.
Actual results are interpolated to determine the performance level achieved among the threshold, target and maximum goals established by the Committee. The following table describes the goals established in February 2013 and actual results available as of April 2016:
|
| | | | | | |
| 2013-2015 PCS RESULTS |
| Performance Measure | Weight | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Actual | Percentage of Target Payout |
| Cumulative Revenue Growth Rate | 33.0% | 6% | 8% | 10% | 3.5% | 0.0% |
Three-Year Operating ROE1 | 33.5% | 10% | 11.5% | 13% | 10.2% | 55.3% |
| Three-Year Relative ROE | 33.5% | 25th Percentile | 50th Percentile | 75th Percentile | TBD | TBD |
| Weighted Average | | | | | TBD | TBD |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 61 for reconciliations to GAAP figures. |
2014-2016PCS Awards. In February 2014, we established the targets and ranges for the 2014 PCS grants. We continued the use of cumulative revenue growth rate, three-year operating ROE and three-year Relative ROE as the performance measures in the same weightings as used in the prior year. The performance period for the 2014 PCS grant began on January 1, 2014 and will end on December 31, 2016.
2015-2017PCS Awards. In February 2015, we established the targets and ranges for the 2015 PCS grants. We continued the use of cumulative revenue growth rate, three-year operating ROE and three-year Relative ROE in the same weightings as used in prior years. The performance period for the 2015 PCS grant began on January 1, 2015 and will end on December 31, 2017.
We established the targets and ranges for cumulative revenue growth rate, three-year operating ROE and three-year Relative ROE for the period beginning in 20152024 at levels that are consistent with our intermediate-term goalsintermediate term-goals for those measures. As a result, we believe that achievement of the targets will require a high level of financial and operating performance.
|
| | | | |
| 2015-2017 PERFORMANCE CONTINGENT SHARE GRANTS |
| Performance Measure | Weight | Threshold | Target | Maximum |
| Cumulative Revenue Growth Rate | 33.0% | 0% | 4% | 8% |
Three-Year Operating Return on Equity1 | 33.5% | 9.5% | 11.5% | 13.5% |
| Three-Year Relative Return on Equity | 33.5% | 25th Percentile | 50th Percentile | 75th Percentile |
1See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 61 for reconciliations to GAAP figures. |
2016-2018PCS Awards. In March 2016, we established the targets and ranges for the 2016 PCS grants. Commencing with this plan period, the cumulative revenue growth rate metric will be replaced with cumulative Operating Revenue growth rate, a non-GAAP financial measure, as a basis for establishing target levels and awards. We believe that cumulative Operating Revenue growth rate better measures the underlying trends of our continuing operations and management actions, primarily because it may exclude certain transactions undertaken for capital management or risk management purposes (such as retroceded blocks of business). We established the targets and ranges for cumulative Operating Revenue growth rate, three-year operating ROE and three-year Relative ROE for the period beginning in 2016 at levels that are consistent with our intermediate-term goals for those measures. As a result, we believe that achievement of the targets will require a high level of financial and operating performance.each measure. The performance period for the 20162024 PCS grant began on January 1, 20162024, and will end on December 31, 2018.2026.
2016 PERFORMANCE CONTINGENT SHARE GRANTS |
| |
Name | Number of PCS Granted |
A. Greig Woodring1
| 42,500 |
Jack B. Lay | 6,158 |
Anna Manning | 16,038 |
Alain P. Néemeh | 5,812 |
Donna H. Kinnaird | 5,812 |
Todd C. Larson | 5,812 |
1 As disclosed in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 8, 2016, the PCS award granted to Mr. Woodring will vest on December 31, 2016.
Compensation Element #4 - Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs")
2015SARs Grant. In March 2015, weThe Committee approved the 20152024 annual SARs awards for our named executive officers. The vesting schedule for the annual SARs grant is four years (vesting 25% at the end of each of the first four years). We made these grants because we believe that SARs are an appropriate vehicle for providing long-term value to participants because of the alignment to long-term shareholder value. The SARs granted in March 2015 have a strike price of $90.06, which was the closing price of our stock on the date the grants were approved. The grants were made pursuant to the terms of the Flexible Stock Plan and award agreements. See "Compensation Tables and Other Matters - Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2015" for a description of the 2015 annual SARs grants.
The following table describes the 2015 annual SARs awards for the named executive officers:2015 SARs GRANTS |
| |
Name | Number of SARs Granted |
A. Greig Woodring | 43,435 |
Jack B. Lay | 8,761 |
Anna Manning | 8,340 |
Alain P. Néemeh | 8,340 |
Donna H. Kinnaird | 8,340 |
Additional SARs grants were made to Ms. Manning and Mr. Néemeh in December 2015. For more information see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2015 Compensation Actions and Results - 2015 Special Grants."
2016SARs Grant. In March 2016, we approved the 2016 annual SARsRSU awards for the named executive officers, as follows:
2016 SARs GRANTS |
| |
Name | Number of SARs Granted |
A. Greig Woodring | 70,704 |
Jack B. Lay | 10,245 |
Anna Manning | 26,681 |
Alain P. Néemeh | 9,669 |
Donna H. Kinnaird | 9,669 |
Todd C. Larson | 9,669 |
outlined in the table below. The vesting schedule for the annual2024 SARs grant is fourratable over three years (vesting 25%one-third at the end of each year). The SARs have a strike pricevesting schedule for the 2024 RSU grant is ratable over three years (vesting one-third at the end of $93.53, which waseach year).
| | | | | | | | |
| 2024 SARs and RSU Grants |
| Name | Number of SARs Granted1 | Number of RSUs Granted1 |
| Tony Cheng | 22,719 | — |
| Todd C. Larson | 6,188 | 2,270 |
| Leslie Barbi | 4,305 | 1,579 |
| Ronald Herrmann | 4,967 | 1,822 |
1 Mr. Cheng will receive 25% of his 2024 LTI awards in stock appreciation rights. Ms. Barbi, Messrs. Larson and Mr. Herrmann will receive 20% of their 2024 LTI awards in stock appreciation rights and 20% in restricted stock units. |
Executive Compensation Process
The Role of the closing priceCommittee
Our executive compensation program is evaluated and approved by the Committee with the objective of providing incentive-based compensation that aligns with the business goals of the Company and the interests of our stock on March 4, 2016,shareholders. The Committee also determines the date the grants were approved.
Compensation Element #5 - Retirement and Pension Benefits
For 2015 and in compliance with the termscompensation of the plans described herein, our executive officers received Company contributions (where applicable) based upon their completionChief Executive Officer ("CEO") (Ms. Manning during 2023 and Mr. Cheng as President and CEO thereafter) and evaluates and approves the compensation for the members of a yearsenior management of credited service and compensation (base pay and cash bonus) earned. Additionally, the contributions made by the Company, on their behalf were in compliance with the U.S. Internal Revenue Code and the Canadian Income Tax Act and other provincial legislation for the Canadianincluding our named executive officers.
U.S. Plans
Under the qualified and non-qualified Pension Plans and Savings Plans, and assuming a retirement on December 31, 2015, the named executive officers would be eligible to receive the benefits listed below:
Qualified and Non-qualified Pension Plans. As of the completion of 2015, Messrs. Woodring and Lay and Ms. Kinnaird met the vesting and normal retirement eligibility and are eligible to receive the benefits in accordance with the plan guidelines.
Qualified and Non-qualified Savings Plans. As of the completion of 2015, Messrs. Woodring and Lay and Ms. Kinnaird met the vesting requirements of the Qualified and Non-qualified Savings Plans and at retirement may choose to retain the accounts as administered by the Company or roll the funds to accounts outside of the plans.
Canadian Plans
UnderRegistered Pension Plan. All permanent Canadian employees are required to join the defined contribution plan on their date of hire. Each employee is required to contribute, by payroll deduction, an amount equal to 6% of their annual earnings (base salary and ABP payments), up to 50% of the maximum allowable limit per calendar year as set under the Canadian Income Tax Act. The Company contributes, on behalf of each employee, an amount equal to the required contribution of the employee, up to 50% of the maximum allowable limit per calendar year as set under the Canadian Income Tax Act. Employer contributions are immediately vested. Ms. Manning previously participated in the Registered Pension Plan before her relocation to the U.S., and she continued to maintain an accumulated balance of past employee and employer contributions.
Defined Benefit Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. The Company offered a defined benefit Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("DB SERP") in Canada to employees at the SERP,vice president level and assuming a retirement on December 31, 2015,above who are approved by senior management. This plan is closed to new participants. An employee must also participate in the Canadian named executive officers who would be eligible to receive benefits are listed below:
Registered Pension Plan. to participate in the DB SERP. The DB SERP offers a traditional defined benefit annuity to participants based on the average of their highest five consecutive years of compensation that is above certain compensation thresholds set out in the plan. The DB SERP benefit is calculated using a number of factors including the employee's years of credited service and average pensionable earnings, each determined on the date the employee ceases to be an executive in Canada or leaves the Company. Benefits are payable at the time an employee leaves the Company. Ms. Manning meetsparticipated in the DB SERP until her relocation to the U.S. in April 2016. Ms. Manning's accrued benefit in the DB SERP was deferred until her retirement.
Named Executive Officer Status. As of the completion of 2023, Ms. Manning met the vesting and early retirement eligibility requirements under the Registered Pension Plan and is eligiblethe DB SERP.
Supplemental Retirement Plan - Hong Kong
The Company offers a supplemental retirement plan to receiveall full-time regular employees in Hong Kong. The plan includes both a mandatory contribution component under the benefits in accordanceHong Kong Mandatory Provident Fund ("MPF") system and a voluntary contribution as a supplementary retirement benefit provided by the Company. Under the plan, both the Company and Hong Kong employees are each required to make regular mandatory contributions calculated at 5% of the employee's relevant income to an MPF plan, subject to the minimum and maximum relevant income levels. The maximum relevant income level is capped at HKD 30,000 per month in 2023. In addition to the mandatory portion, the Company makes contributions at a total of 10.8% of the base remuneration, up to a maximum amount, less any mandatory employer contributions. The maximum amount for calculating the contributions is
set at HKD 2.5 million per annum. The benefit is subject to a vesting schedule associated with years of continuous service with the Company. The Hong Kong supplementary retirement plan guidelines. Mr. Néemeh doeshas a 10-year graded vesting period. Contributions to the MPF plan are not yet meetbe available to employees until they reach age 65 or until they depart Hong Kong. Contributions to the earlysupplementary retirement eligibility criteria.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. Ms. Manning meetsfund are subject to the vesting period and earlycan be withdrawn upon termination of employment.
Named Executive Officer Status. Mr. Cheng participated in the Hong Kong supplementary retirement eligibility requirementsbenefit during 2023 and is eligible to receivereceived contributions under the benefits in accordanceplan up until his transfer to the U.S. As of the completion of 2023 Mr. Cheng no longer is an active participant or account holder in the Supplemental Retirement Plan.
2024 Compensation Actions
In October 2023, the Committee approved compensation for 2024 as outlined below. The Committee approved allocation of Long-Term Incentive compensation to each named executive officer in March 2024.
The Committee approved the following changes to base salary:
| | | | | | | | |
| 2024 Named Executive Officer Base Salaries |
| Name | Base Salary | Percentage Increase |
Tony Cheng1 | $950,000 | 26.7% |
| Todd C. Larson | $725,000 | 3.6% |
| Leslie Barbi | $650,000 | 4.0% |
| Ronald Herrmann | $675,000 | 3.8% |
1Increase reflects Mr. Cheng's promotion to Chief Executive Officer. |
The Committee approved the following ABP opportunities as outlined in the table below. Beginning in 2024 the Annual Bonus Plan will utilize an enterprise pool plan guidelines. Mr. Néemeh does not yet meetdesign. The Company will use a top-down pool design, where funding is driven by performance against key financial and non-financial metrics at the early retirement eligibility criteria.Company level. Financial metrics include adjusted operating income per share, new business embedded value and total revenues. The Company will continue to utilize a strategic scorecard to capture and evaluate key non-financial goals. The Committee will continue to approve both the annual goals and the payout results.
2015 Special | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2024 Annual Bonus Plan Opportunities |
| Name | ABP Threshold | ABP Target | ABP Maximum |
| Tony Cheng | 87.5% | 175% | 350% |
| Todd C. Larson | 65% | 130% | 260% |
| Leslie Barbi | 100% | 200% | 400% |
| Ronald Herrmann | 65% | 130% | 260% |
| | | | | |
| 2024 PCS Awards | |
| Name | Number of PCS Granted |
| Tony Cheng | 24,996 |
| Todd C. Larson | 6,809 |
| Leslie Barbi | 4,736 |
| Ronald Herrmann | 5,465 |
The Committee established the target and ranges for the following PCS performance measures: (i) three-year adjusted operating return on equity and (ii) three-year book value per share, excluding AOCI. These results may be modified up or down by a maximum of 20% based on three-year relative total shareholder return. The total shareholder return modifier was increased from 2023 in order to continue to strengthen alignment of long-term incentive compensation with the experience of our shareholders. These measures were set for the period beginning in 2024 at levels that are consistent with our intermediate term-goals for each measure. The performance period for the 2024 PCS grant began on January 1, 2024, and will end on December 31, 2026.
2024 SARs and RSU Grants
In connectionThe Committee approved the 2024 annual SARs and RSU awards for the named executive officers, as outlined in the table below. The vesting schedule for the 2024 SARs grant is ratable over three years (vesting one-third at the end of each year). The vesting schedule for the 2024 RSU grant is ratable over three years (vesting one-third at the end of each year).
| | | | | | | | |
| 2024 SARs and RSU Grants |
| Name | Number of SARs Granted1 | Number of RSUs Granted1 |
| Tony Cheng | 22,719 | — |
| Todd C. Larson | 6,188 | 2,270 |
| Leslie Barbi | 4,305 | 1,579 |
| Ronald Herrmann | 4,967 | 1,822 |
1 Mr. Cheng will receive 25% of his 2024 LTI awards in stock appreciation rights. Ms. Barbi, Messrs. Larson and Mr. Herrmann will receive 20% of their 2024 LTI awards in stock appreciation rights and 20% in restricted stock units. |
Executive Compensation Process
The Role of the Committee
Our executive compensation program is evaluated and approved by the Committee with the appointmentobjective of Ms. Manning to Presidentproviding incentive-based compensation that aligns with the business goals of the Company and the leadership transitions arisinginterests of our shareholders. The Committee also determines the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") (Ms. Manning during 2023 and Mr. Cheng as President and CEO thereafter) and evaluates and approves the compensation for the members of senior management of the Company, including our named executive officers.
Timing of Compensation Decisions
The Committee approves compensation for executive officers each year. All compensation and incentive awards are made in consideration of market pay competitiveness and in comparison to peer company and published survey data.
In November 2022, the Committee approved 2023 compensation for the executive officers other than the CEO, inclusive of base salary and targets for both bonus and long-term incentive awards. In December 2022, the Committee approved compensation for the CEO for 2023. In March 2023, the Committee approved the grants of PCS, RSU and SAR awards. Equity grants are effective on and have a grant date of the same day as the Committee meeting. The strike price for grants of SARs is the NYSE closing price of our common stock on the day of the Committee meeting. This timing and process is designed to ensure that our fourth quarter earnings information (typically released in late January or early February) is fully disseminated to the market by the time the SARs strike price is determined.
Compensation Consultant
In forming its recommendations on our overall compensation program, the Committee engages an independent consulting firm to provide advice about competitive compensation practices and to determine how our executive compensation compares to that of other comparable companies, including selected publicly held insurance and reinsurance companies. In 2023, Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC ("Meridian") served as independent advisor to the Committee.
The Committee directly engaged Meridian to advise and assist with decisions relating to our executive compensation program, including providing advice regarding incentive plan design, annual comprehensive competitive market studies, competitive compensation data for directors, technical advice on disclosure requirements relating to executive compensation and to apprise the Committee of compensation market practices. Meridian also performs competitive marketplaces assessments of our named executive officers, which includes a comparison to our peer companies and published survey data. Meridian will also periodically conduct reviews of our incentive plans to ensure a competitive position.
Other than work for the Committee, Meridian provides no other services to the Company or its affiliates. Additionally, the Committee determined no conflicts of interest existed to prevent Meridian from Mr. Woodring's expected retirementserving as an independent advisor to the Committee.
Management Participation and Involvement in Compensation Decisions
Pursuant to the Committee charter, the Committee reviews and approves the compensation of our CEO, other named executive officers and senior management. The CEO plays a significant role in the compensation-setting process for the named executive officers (other than the CEO). The CEO and senior management play a significant role in setting compensation for management and all other employees. No member of management is involved in determinations regarding their own pay. The most significant aspects of management's role are:
•evaluating employee performance;
•recommending business performance targets, goals and objectives; and
•recommending salary levels, ABP and equity incentive award targets.
Our CEO and Chief Human Resources Officer work with the Committee chair to establish the agenda for Committee meetings. The Company prepares relevant information and reports for each Committee meeting. Our CEO participates in Committee meetings at the endCommittee's request to provide:
•background information regarding our strategic objectives;
•an evaluation of 2016,the performance of the senior management and direct reports; and
•compensation recommendations as to senior management and direct reports.
Our executives and other members of management are made available to Meridian or any other compensation consultant to provide information regarding position descriptions, compensation history and other information as requested, and to review draft results provided by Meridian.
Competitive Marketplace Assessment
We use our established peer group of companies to evaluate our compensation practices for purposes such as pay levels and performance design for our named executive offices as well as director compensation.
| | | | | |
| Peer Companies |
| 2023 Peer Companies |
| Aflac, Incorporated | Manulife Financial Corp. |
| Assurant, Inc. | Principal Financial Group, Inc. |
| Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | Prudential Financial, Inc. |
| CNO Financial Group, Inc. | Sun Life Financial, Inc. |
| Equitable Holdings, Inc. | The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. |
| Globe Life, Inc. | Unum Group |
| iA Financial Corporation Inc. | Voya Financial, Inc. |
| Lincoln National Corp. | |
| |
The Committee selected the members of the peer group from companies in the life and health insurance industry based on December 1, 2015the size of these firms as compared to the Company. The Committee analyzed the peer group based on total revenue, market capitalization and total assets. The Committee believes the Company's relative size based on these metrics makes the peer group a good basis for helping the Committee awarded an additional grantassess appropriate levels of SARscompensation for the Company's senior executives. The following table presents a summary of these metrics for the peer group as compared to Ms. Manning valued at $3,000,000 (153,453 SARs) that will fully vest on November 30, 2020. On December 1, 2015, the Committee also granted SARs to Mr. Néemeh, valued at $2,000,000 (102,302 SARs), which vest fully on November 30, 2020. On the same date, the Committee granted Restricted Share Units to Ms. Kinnaird. Ms. Kinnaird’s grant was valued at $600,000 (6,437 RSUs) and fully vests on January 11, 2017.Company: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Peer Group Metrics |
| Total Revenue1 ($M) | Market Capitalization1 ($M) | Total Assets1 ($M) |
| 25th Percentile | $6,675 | $7,223 | $67,158 |
| Median | $11,645 | $11,272 | $157,085 |
| 75th Percentile | $19,666 | $27,291 | $290,930 |
| RGA | $18,567 | $10,662 | $97,623 |
| RGA Percentile Rank | 71% | 48% | 39% |
1Total Trailing 12-months Revenue and Total Assets are based on most recent annual or quarterly public disclosure as of December 31, 2023. Market Capitalization is presented as of December 31, 2023. |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORTPeer Company Changes
The Committee regularly reviews the companies we use to evaluate our compensation practices for purposes such as pay levels and pay design. In 2023, Meridian performed an analysis of the Company's Peer Group and recommended adding Prudential Financial, Inc. into the peer group. We review and update this information periodically to ensure that our peer company comparators remain appropriate in light of evolving practices with respect to peer determinations, mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, growth in our size and the size of those companies and other changes which might affect the appropriateness of a particular comparator.
How We Use Peer Company Data
When making determinations in 2023 relating to base salary, target total cash compensation, intermediate and long-term incentives and target total direct compensation for our named executive officers, we used the competitive compensation analysis provided by Meridian as the beginning reference point. This analysis included a review and assessment of publicly disclosed compensation data for our peer companies, as well as additional industry-appropriate survey data. In most markets, we align our target executive compensation levels with the market median to retain current talent and attract new talent. In addition to a review of the competitive compensation data provided by Meridian, we also considered individual performance, internal pay equity among positions and levels and the relative importance of positions. We believe that the compensation strategy we established aligns our target compensation with the market median and should allow us to retain our current talent and attract new talent.
Please see "Five Elements of Compensation and 2023 Actions - Compensation Element #3 - Performance Contingent Awards" above for additional information on the peer group used for the Relative TSR modifier.
Committee Report
The Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on its review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the portions of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis described in Regulation S-K Item 402(b) be included in this Proxy Statement. This report is provided by the following independent directors, who comprise the Committee as of the date of this Proxy Statement:
Hazel M. McNeilage, Chair
Pina Albo
John F. Danahy, ChairmanGauthier
J. Cliff EasonGeorge Nichols, III
Joyce A. Phillips
Fred J. Sievert
Stanley B. Tulin
COMPENSATION TABLES AND OTHER MATTERSShundrawn Thomas
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES
Summary Compensation Table
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and
Principal Position
| Year
| Salary1
| Bonus
| Stock Awards2
| Option Awards3
| Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation4
| Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings5 | All Other Compensation6
| Total
|
Anna Manning CEO | 2023 | $1,098,654 | — | $7,350,004 | $— | $3,782,574 | $959,479 | $343,720 | $13,534,431 |
| 2022 | $1,030,000 | — | $3,124,951 | $3,124,986 | $3,374,547 | $501,924 | $198,254 | $11,354,662 |
| 2021 | $1,030,000 | — | $6,375,029 | $6,375,109 | $1,504,315 | $635,367 | $189,695 | $16,109,515 |
Todd C. Larson Sr. EVP and CFO | 2023 | $699,519 | — | $1,217,945 | $812,042 | $1,512,581 | $484,675 | $160,244 | $4,887,006 |
| 2022 | $675,000 | — | $742,514 | $742,501 | $1,448,070 | $204,542 | $100,118 | $3,912,745 |
| 2021 | $645,000 | — | $1,377,827 | $1,377,799 | $628,017 | $305,797 | $93,685 | $4,428,125 |
Tony Cheng President | 2023 | $749,129 | — | $1,546,918 | $515,613 | $1,934,269 | $3,204 | $1,763,761 | $6,512,894 |
| 2022 | $638,538 | — | $385,319 | $385,254 | $1,053,366 | $714 | $306,421 | $2,769,612 |
| 2021 | $612,414 | — | $596,284 | $596,310 | $366,196 | $686 | $302,763 | $2,474,653 |
Leslie Barbi EVP and Chief Investment Officer | 2023 | $624,519 | — | $749,941 | $499,998 | $2,174,600 | $— | $193,333 | $4,242,391 |
| 2022 | $600,000 | — | $599,977 | $599,989 | $1,250,328 | $— | $147,451 | $3,197,745 |
| 2021 | $575,000 | — | $605,057 | $605,068 | $808,278 | $— | $108,595 | $2,701,998 |
Ronald Herrmann EVP, Head of RGA Americas | 2023 | $649,615 | — | $585,040 | $390,042 | $1,300,000 | $— | $176,308 | $3,101,005 |
| 2022 | $624,231 | — | $377,968 | $377,997 | $1,060,970 | $— | $136,187 | $2,577,353 |
| 2021 | $600,000 | — | $359,938 | $359,963 | $662,706 | $— | $66,623 | $2,049,230 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Name and Principal Position
| Year
| Salary1
| Bonus
| Stock Awards2
| Option Awards3
| Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation4
| Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings5
| All Other Compensation6
| Total
|
A. Greig Woodring CEO | 2015 | $1,117,692 | --- | $2,775,019 | $1,305,222 | $1,431,875 | $2,697,661 | $43,510 | $9,370,979 |
| 2014 | $1,056,154 | --- | $2,499,745 | $1,046,343 | $2,681,927 | $2,119,230 | $66,916 | $9,470,315 |
| 2013 | $1,035,385 | --- | $1,400,019 | $1,267,843 | $479,482 | $105,030 | $85,059 | $4,372,818 |
Jack B. Lay Sr. EVP and CFO | 2015 | $642,025 | --- | $559,723 | $263,268 | $634,302 | $573,827 | $103,791 | $2,776,936 |
| 2014 | $598,104 | --- | $541,747 | $226,764 | $1,054,388 | $396,351 | $63,628 | $2,880,982 |
| 2013 | $579,994 | --- | $349,153 | $316,213 | $201,227 | $138,916 | $90,178 | $1,675,681 |
Anna Manning President | 2015 | $521,811 | --- | $532,795 | $3,250,617 | $560,923 | $650,738 | $11,845 | $5,528,729 |
Alain P. Néemeh Sr. EVP | 2015 | $498,566 | --- | $532,795 | $2,250,617 | $560,923 | $668,312 | $15,276 | $4,526,489 |
Donna H. Kinnaird Sr. EVP and COO | 2015 | $585,115 | --- | $1,132,788 | $250,617 | $577,751 | $170,060 | $36,503 | $2,752,834 |
| 2014 | $535,750 | --- | $397,815 | $166,527 | $856,350 | $80,401 | $57,764 | $2,094,607 |
| 2013 | $513,269 | --- | $257,471 | $233,198 | $158,290 | $117,660 | $477,823 | $1,757,711 |
| |
1. | 1.This column includes any amounts deferred at the election of the named executive officers under the Company's Executive Deferred Savings Plan and retirement Savings Plan. For 2023, the base salary for Mr. Cheng was determined in HKD and converted to USD using an average monthly foreign exchange rate until January 4, 2023. After January 4, 2023 Mr. Cheng's base salary was determined in USD and converted to HKD using an average monthly foreign exchange rate until his transfer of employment to the U.S., after which his base salary was paid in USD. 2.This column represents the grant date fair value of PCS and PSU awards granted in such year, using probable outcomes of performance conditions, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification: 718 – Compensation – Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"). For additional information on the valuation assumptions, refer to note 20 of the Company's financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as filed with the SEC. See also "Grants of the executive officers under the RGA Reinsurance Company Executive Deferred Savings Plan. For Mr. Néemeh and Ms. Manning, the base salary reflects the Canadian salaries paid over the year taking into consideration monthly foreign exchange rates to convert to USD. |
| |
2. | This column represents the grant date fair value of PCS units granted in such year, using probable outcomes of performance conditions, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification: 718 – Compensation – Stock Compensation ("ASC 718"). For additional information on the valuation assumptions, refer to note 16 of the Company’s financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC. See also "Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2015" for information on awards made in 2015. These amounts reflect the grant date fair value for these awards, and do not correspond to the actual value that may be recognized by the named executive officers. |
| |
3. | This column represents the grant date fair value of SARs and RSUs granted in such year, in accordance with ASC 718. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, refer to note 16 of the Company’s financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC. See also "Grants of |
Plan-Based Awards in 2015"2023" for information on SARs grantedawards made in March 2015 and "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2015 Compensation Actions and Results - 2015 Special Grants" for information on SARs and RSUs granted in December 2015.2023. These amounts reflect the grant date fair value for these awards, and do not correspond to the actual value that may be recognized by the named executive officers. | |
4. | 3.This column represents the grant date fair value of SARs and RSUs granted in such year, in accordance with ASC 718. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, refer to note 20 of the Company's financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as filed with the SEC. See also "Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2023" for information on SARs granted in March 2023. These amounts reflect the grant date fair value for these awards and do not correspond to the actual value that may be recognized by the named executive officers. 4.Includes for all named executive officers, cash incentives earned for performance during each fiscal year and paid in March of the following year (including any incentives deferred at the election of the executive officers) under the Annual Bonus Plan. |
| |
5. | This column represents the sum of the change in pension value in each fiscal year for each of the named executive officers. The increase in Mr. Woodring’s change in pension value is attributed to his tenure with the Company and his age. The pension benefit increases in value as a participant nears the age of 65. The increase in the pension value for 2015, relative to prior years is due to changes in the interest rate assumptions, thus reducing the present value. We do not pay above-market or preferential earnings on any account balances; therefore, this column does not reflect any amounts relating to nonqualified deferred compensation earnings. See the "Pension Benefits in 2015" and "Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2015" tables for additional information. |
The change in pension value for the Canadian named executive officers, (Ms. Manningcash incentives earned for performance during each fiscal year and Mr. Néemeh),paid in March of the following year (including any incentives deferred at the election of the executive officers) under the Annual Bonus Plan.
5.This column represents the sum of the change in pension value in each fiscal year for each of the defined contributionnamed executive officers. The increase in pension value for 2023 is attributable to service and compensation increases, offset in part by assumption changes from the prior year. The Company does not pay above-market or preferential earnings on any account balances; therefore, this column does not reflect any amounts relating to nonqualified deferred compensation earnings. See the "Pension Benefits in 2023" and "Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2023" tables for additional information.
The change in pension value for Ms. Manning represents the sum of the change in pension value for the U.S. Pension Plans as well as the RGA Canadian Defined Benefit Plan SERP. Ms. Manning has not accrued additional benefits under the RGA Canadian Defined Benefit Plan SERP plan andsince her transfer to the executive retirement plan (SERP).U.S. in April 2016. The change in pension value for the RGA Canadian defined contribution plan is due to employer and employee contributions as well as overall fund performance. The change in pension value for the Canadian executive retirement plan (SERP)Defined Benefit Plan SERP is due to changes in interest rate assumptionsassumptions. The accumulated value of the RGA Canadian Defined Benefit Plan SERP is calculated by converting the participant's accrued annuity benefit under the plan to an actuarial equivalent present value amount as well service accrual andof the measurement date. The interest rate assumption used for this conversion has a material impact on the calculation. As a result, significant changes in interest rates from year to year can lead to material changes to the average pensionable earnings.accumulated value of the benefit.
| |
6. | Amount includes contributions by RGA Reinsurance Company to the officers’ accounts in qualified and nonqualified plans for the 2015 plan year. Includes life insurance premiums paid by RGA Reinsurance Company on behalf of Messrs. Woodring, Lay and Ms. Kinnaird. Also includes Company match contributions for 2015 under the Savings Plan of $13,250, for Messrs. Woodring, Lay and Ms. Kinnaird. Messrs. Woodring, Lay and Ms. Kinnaird also made qualified employee contributions of $18,000. |
For Ms. Manning, this column also includes the accrual value of a supplemental payment to be paid following her retirement from the Company, as an acknowledgment of the financial implications on her retirement benefits with respect to her relocation to the U.S. from Canada in 2016. The supplemental payment represents the difference between (i) the value of the Company-provided benefits that she would have received upon her retirement had she worked her entire career (starting upon her hire date in 2007 through retirement) in the U.S., and (ii) the value of Company-provided benefits that she will actually receive upon retirement from the Company. For this purpose, Company-provided benefits include any savings, pension or deferred compensation benefits funded by the Company based on her deferrals of pay, additional non-elective contributions to company retirement accounts and any subsequent investment returns credited to those deferred compensation accounts based on contribution from the Company. The value of any salary deferrals by Ms. Manning, including any subsequent investment return credited to those retirement accounts for those salary deferrals, is not included in the calculation of this supplemental payment. This payment will be a single lump sum payment made in U.S. dollars following Ms. Manning's retirement from the Company. See "Five Elements of Compensation - Compensation Element #5 - Retirement and Pension Benefits" for more information.
Mr. Cheng accrued a benefit in the U.S. pension plan prior to his transfer outside of the country in 2002. Mr. Cheng has not accrued additional benefits in the plan while he has been employed in Hong Kong, but resumed accruing additional benefits in the plan upon his transfer back to the U.S. in 2023.
6.Amount includes contributions by the Company to the officers' accounts in qualified and nonqualified plans for the 2023 plan year. Includes life insurance premiums paid by the Company on behalf of Ms. Manning in the amount of $15,732, Mr. Larson in the amount of $9,913, Mr. Cheng in the amount of $1,491, Ms. Barbi in the amount of $7,139, and Mr. Herrmann in the amount of $7,900. Amount includes Company contributions on behalf of Mr. Cheng to the Mandatory Provident Fund in the amount of $43,240.
Includes Company contributions for 2023 under the Savings Plan of $33,000 for Ms. Barbi and Mr. Herrmann, $23,100 for Ms. Manning and Messrs. Larson, and $22,336 for Mr. Cheng. Also includes Company contributions for 2023 under the Augmented Savings Plans of $82,864 for Ms. Manning, $36,352 for Mr. Larson, $317 for Mr. Cheng, $77,242 for Ms. Barbi and $69,029 for Mr. Herrmann. Includes Company matching contributions for 2023 under the Executive Deferred Savings Plan ("EDSP") of $207,160 for Ms. Manning, $90,879 for Mr. Larson, $793 for Mr. Cheng, $75,952 for Ms. Barbi and $65,469 for Mr. Herrmann.
In 2023, Mr. Cheng received a total of $138,601 for local allowances, of which $37,088 was for education and $101,513 was for housing. Allowances are benefits offered to select executives in Hong Kong and are reviewed on an annual basis to ensure compensation in Hong Kong remains market competitive.
For 2023, amount includes foreign tax preparation taxable benefit amount grossed up for taxes for Ms. Manning in the amount of $9,655 and for Mr. Cheng in the amount of $7,267. Amount also includes professional dues paid by the Company on behalf of Ms. Manning for $1,944, Mr. Cheng for $665 and Mr. Herrmann of $910. Amount includes fees paid by the Company for club memberships including the use of a fitness facility for Mr. Cheng in the amount of $5,104. Amount includes fringe medical benefit costs paid by the Company on behalf of Ms. Manning for $3,265. Amount includes payout by the Company of unused vacation following departure from Hong Kong for Mr. Cheng in the amount of $108,639. Amount includes moving expenses including tax gross up for Mr. Cheng's move from Hong Kong to the U.S. in the amount of $75,838. Amount includes tax equalization payments grossed up for taxes associated with relocation to the US for Mr. Cheng in the amount of $1,359,469.
41
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20152023
This table provides the following information about equity and non-equity awards granted to the named executive officers in 2015:2023: (1) the grant date; (2) the estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards, which consist of potential payouts under the Annual Bonus Plan award granted in 20152023 for the 20152023 performance period; (3) estimated future payouts under equity incentive plan awards, which consist of potential payouts under the PCS grants in 20152023 for the 2015-20172023-2025 performance period; (4) all other option awards, which consist of the SARs and Restricted Stock Unit ("RSU")RSU awards granted to the named executive officers in 2015;2023; (5) the strike price of the SARs granted, which reflects the closing price of Company stock on the date of grant and (6) the grant date fair value of each equity grant calculated under ASC 718.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2023 |
| Name | Grant Date | Estimated Future Payments Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards¹ | Estimated Future Payments Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (Number of Shares)² | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units3 | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options4
| Exercise of Base Price of Option Awards5
| Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards6
|
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum |
| Anna Manning | 3/9/2023 | $1,100,000 | $2,200,000 | $4,400,000 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| --- | --- | --- | 26,565 | 53,130 | 106,260 | --- | --- | --- | $7,350,004 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Todd C. Larson | 3/9/2023 | $455,000 | $910,000 | $1,820,000 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| --- | --- | --- | 4,402 | 8,804 | 17,608 | --- | --- | --- | $1,217,945 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 2,935 | --- | --- | $406,028 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 8,602 | $138.34 | $406,014 |
| Tony Cheng | 3/9/2023 | $562,500 | $1,125,000 | $2,250,000 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| --- | --- | --- | 5,591 | 11,182 | 22,364 | --- | --- | --- | $1,546,918 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 10,924 | $138.34 | $515,613 |
| Leslie Barbi | 3/9/2023 | $625,000 | $1,250,000 | $2,500,000 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| --- | --- | --- | 2,711 | 5,421 | 10,842 | --- | --- | --- | $749,941 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 1,807 | --- | --- | $249,980 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 5,297 | $138.34 | $250,018 |
| Ronald Herrmann | 3/9/2023 | $325,000 | $650,000 | $1,300,000 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| --- | --- | --- | 2,115 | 4,229 | 8,458 | --- | --- | --- | $585,040 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 1,410 | --- | --- | $195,059 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 4,131 | $138.34 | $194,983 |
|
1. These columns reflect the potential value of the payment for 2023 performance under the ABP for each named executive if the minimum, target or maximum goals are satisfied. The potential payments are performance-driven and are therefore completely at risk. The performance measures, salary and ABP multiples for determining the payments are described in the CD&A. The ABP payment amount for actual 2023 performance was determined in February 2024 based on the metrics described in the CD&A and is included in the "Summary Compensation Table" in the column titled "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation." | GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2015 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Grant Date | Estimated Future Payments Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards¹ | Estimated Future Payments Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (Number of Shares)² | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units3 | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options4
| Exercise of Base Price of Option Awards5
| Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards6
|
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum |
A. Greig Woodring | 3/6/2015 | $702,000 | $1,404,000 | $2,808,000 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| --- | --- | --- | 15,407 | 30,813 | 61,626 | --- | --- | --- | $2,775,019 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 43,435 | $90.06 | $1,305,222 |
Jack B. Lay | 3/6/2015 | $310,975 | $621,950 | $1,243,900 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| --- | --- | --- | 3,108 | 6,215 | 12,430 | --- | --- | --- | $559,723 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 8,761 | $90.06 | $263,268 |
| Anna Manning | 3/6/2015 | $275,000 | $550,000 | $1,100,000 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| --- | --- | --- | 2,958 | 5,916 | 11,832 | --- | --- | --- | $532,795 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 8,340 | $90.06 | $250,617 |
| 12/1/2015 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 153,453 | $93.21 | $3,000,000 |
Alain P. Néemeh
| 3/6/2015 | $275,000 | $550,000 | $1,100,000 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| --- | --- | --- | 2,958 | 5,916 | 11,832 | --- | --- | --- | $532,795 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 8,340 | $90.06 | $250,617 |
| 12/1/2015 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 102,302 | $93.21 | $2,000,000 |
| Donna H. Kinnaird | 3/6/2015 | $283,250 | $566,500 | $1,133,000 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| --- | --- | --- | 2,958 | 5,916 | 11,832 | --- | --- | --- | $532,795 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 8,340 | $90.06 | $250,617 |
| 12/1/2015 | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | 6,437 | --- | --- | $599,993 |
| |
1. | These columns reflect the potential value of the payment for 2015 performance under the ABP for each named executive if the minimum, target or maximum goals are satisfied. The potential payments are performance-driven and are therefore completely at risk. The performance measures, salary and bonus multiples for determining the payments are described in the CD&A. The bonus amount for actual 2015 performance was determined in March 2016 based on the metrics described in the CD&A and is included in the "Summary Compensation Table" in the column titled "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation." |
| |
2. | This column reflects the number of PCS units granted in March 2015 under our Flexible Stock Plan, which may convert into shares of Company stock at the end of the three-year performance period if the specified performance levels are achieved. The performance period commenced January 1, 2015 and ends December 31, 2017. If the threshold level of performance is met, the award of shares starts at 50% (target is 100% and maximum is 200%).
|
| |
3. | This column reflects the number of RSUs granted to Ms. Kinnaird in December 2015, which vest fully on January 11, 2017. See discussion of PCS awards and 2015 Special Grants in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2015 Compensation Actions and Results - 2015 Special Grants." |
2. This column reflects the number of ContentsPCS units granted in March 2023, which may convert into shares of Company stock at the end of the three-year performance period if the specified performance levels are achieved. The performance period commenced January 1, 2023 and ends December 31, 2025. If the threshold level of performance is met, the award of shares starts at 50% with a target of 100% and a maximum of 200%.
3. This column reflects the number of RSUs granted in March 2023, which vest over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2023 and ends on December 31, 2025.
4. This column reflects the number of SARs granted in March 2023, which vest and become exercisable in four equal annual installments of 25%, beginning on December 31, 2023.
5. This column reflects the strike price per share of common stock for the SARs granted, which is the closing price of the common stock on March 9, 2023, the date the Committee approved the grants.
6. This column reflects the full grant date fair value of the performance contingent awards under ASC 718, the full grant date fair value of the RSUs and the SARs under ASC 718 granted to the named executive officers in 2023. See notes 3 and 4 of the "Summary Compensation Table" for a discussion of fair value calculation related to the performance contingent awards, RSUs and SARs respectively. For PCS awards with the grant date of March 9, 2023, the fair value is calculated using the closing price of Company stock of $138.34. For SARs with a grant date of March 9, 2023, fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes value of $47.20. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, refer to note 20 of the Company's financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as filed with the SEC. These amounts reflect the grant date fair value, and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named executive officers. The PCS awards are subject to specified performance objectives over the applicable performance periods, the results of which will determine the amount of payouts, if any, under such awards. | |
4. | This column reflects the number of SARs granted in March 2015 and December 2015. The March 2015 SARs vest and become exercisable in four equal annual installments of 25%, beginning on December 31, 2015. The December 2015 SARs granted to Ms. Manning and Mr. Néemeh vest fully on November 30, 2020.
|
| |
5. | This column reflects the strike price per share of common stock for the SARs granted, which is the closing price of the common stock on March 6, 2015 and December 1, 2015, the dates the Compensation Committee approved the grants.
|
| |
6. | This column reflects the full grant date fair value of PCS units under ASC 718 and the full grant date fair value of SARs under ASC 718 granted to the named executive officers in 2015. See notes 2 and 3 of the "Summary Compensation Table" for a discussion of fair value calculation related to the PCS and SARs respectively. For PCS units with the grant date of March 6, 2015, fair value is calculated using the closing price of Company stock of $90.06. For SARs with a grant date of March 6, 2015, fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes value of $30.05. For SARs with a grant date of December 1, 2015, fair value is calculated using the Black-Scholes value of $19.55. For additional information on the valuation assumptions, refer to note 16 of the Company’s financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC. These amounts reflect the grant date fair value, and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named executive officers. For example, the PCS units are subject to specified performance objectives over the performance period, with 33.0% tied to cumulative revenue growth rate, 33.5% tied to three-year operating ROE and 33.5% tied to three-year Relative ROE. The grant date fair value is calculated assuming a target payout. In addition, the value of options, if any, realized by the optionee will not be determined until exercise. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at 20152023 Year-End
The following table provides information on the 20152023 year-end holdings of SARs, RSUs stock options and PCSperformance contingent awards by our named executive officers. This table includes vested and unvested SARs RSU and option awardsRSUs and unvested PCS grantsperformance contingent awards with performance conditions that have not yet been satisfied. The vesting schedule for each grant is described in the footnotes following this table, based on the grant date. The market value of the stock awards is based on the closing market price of Company stock as of December 31, 2015,the last business day of 2023, which was $85.55.$161.78. The PCS grantsperformance contingent awards are subject to specified performance objectives over the performance period. For additional information about the option awards and stock awards, see the description of equity incentive compensation in the CD&A.
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2023 Year-End | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Option Awards | Stock Awards |
| Grant Date | Number of Securities of Underlying Unexercised Options (Exercisable)1 | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (Unexercisable)
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unearned Options
| Option
Exercise
Price | Option
Expiration
Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested2 | Market Value of Shares or Units or Stock That Have Not Vested2 | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested3 | Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested3 |
| Anna Manning |
| 3/6/2015 | 8,340 | | | $90.06 | 3/6/2025 | | | | |
| 12/1/2015 | 153,453 | | | $93.21 | 12/1/2025 | | | | |
| 3/4/2016 | 26,681 | | | $93.53 | 3/4/2026 | | | | |
| 3/3/2017 | 27,919 | | | $129.72 | 3/3/2027 | | | | |
| 3/2/2018 | 28,016 | | | $150.87 | 3/2/2028 | | | | |
| 3/1/2019 | 37,215 | | | $145.25 | 3/1/2029 | | | | |
| 3/6/2020 | 95,388 | | | $117.85 | 3/6/2030 | | | | |
| 3/11/2021 | 30,865 | 10,289 | | $129.01 | 3/11/2031 | | | | |
| 3/22/2022 | 25,573 | 25,573 | | $106.53 | 3/22/2032 | 14,667 | $2,372,827 | 58,668 | $9,491,309 |
| 3/9/2023 | | | | — | — | | | 53,130 | $8,595,371 |
| Todd C. Larson |
| 3/6/2015 | 3,926 | | | $90.06 | 3/6/2025 | | | | |
| 3/4/2016 | 9,669 | | | $93.53 | 3/4/2026 | | | | |
| 3/3/2017 | 5,369 | | | $129.72 | 3/3/2027 | | | | |
| 3/2/2018 | 6,444 | | | $150.87 | 3/2/2028 | | | | |
| 3/1/2019 | 8,187 | | | $145.25 | 3/1/2029 | | | | |
| 3/6/2020 | 20,330 | | | $117.85 | 3/6/2030 | | | | |
| 3/11/2021 | 6,578 | 2,193 | | $129.01 | 3/11/2031 | | | | |
| 3/22/2022 | 6,076 | 6,076 | | $106.53 | 3/22/2032 | 3,485 | $563,803 | 13,940 | $2,255,213 |
| 3/9/2023 | 2,150 | 6,452 | | $138.34 | 3/9/2033 | 2,935 | $474,824 | 8,804 | $1,424,311 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tony Cheng |
| 3/6/2015 | 3,411 | | | $90.06 | 3/6/2025 | | | | |
| 3/4/2016 | 4,152 | | | $93.53 | 3/4/2026 | | | | |
| 3/3/2017 | 3,280 | | | $129.72 | 3/3/2027 | | | | |
| 3/2/2018 | 3,384 | | | $150.87 | 3/2/2028 | | | | |
| 3/1/2019 | 3,882 | | | $145.25 | 3/1/2029 | | | | |
| 3/6/2020 | 8,127 | | | $117.85 | 3/6/2030 | | | | |
| 3/11/2021 | 2,618 | 873 | | $129.01 | 3/11/2031 | | | | |
| 3/22/2022 | 3,153 | 3,153 | | $106.53 | 3/22/2032 | 1,808 | $292,498 | 7,234 | $1,170,317 |
| 3/9/2023 | 2,731 | 8,193 | | $138.34 | 3/9/2033 | | | 11,182 | $1,809,024 |
| Leslie Barbi |
| 3/6/2020 | 13,354 | | | $117.85 | 3/6/2030 | | | | |
| 3/11/2021 | 4,321 | 1,441 | | | $129.01 | 3/11/2031 | | | | |
| 3/22/2022 | 4,910 | 4,910 | | | $106.53 | 3/22/2032 | 2,816 | $455,572 | 11,264 | $1,822,290 |
| 3/9/2023 | 1,324 | 3,973 | | | $138.34 | 3/9/2033 | 1,807 | $292,336 | 5,421 | $877,009 |
| Ronald Herrmann |
| 12/1/2020 | | | | — | — | 7,006 | | $1,133,431 | | |
| 3/11/2021 | 1,288 | 1,289 | | | $129.01 | 3/11/2031 | | | | |
| 3/22/2022 | 1,547 | 3,094 | | | $106.53 | 3/22/2032 | 1,774 | | $286,998 | 7,096 | $1,147,991 |
| 3/9/2023 | 1,032 | 3,099 | | $138.34 | 3/9/2033 | 1,410 | $228,110 | 4,229 | $684,168 |
1. SARs vest over four years (25% of Contentswhich vests at the end of each of the four years).
2. These columns reflect the number of RSUs granted in December 2020 to Mr. Herrmann when he joined the Company, which fully vest in December 2025, RSUs granted March 2022, which fully vest on December 31, 2024, and the RSUs granted in March 2023, which fully vest on December 31, 2025.
3. These columns reflect the number of shares and estimated market value of PCS grants. The Company is measuring financial performance over a three-year period for the 2022 PCS awards. Targets established for the 2022 grant were adjusted for impacts of the implementation of LDTI under new GAAP accounting rules effective January 1, 2023. SEC rules require disclosure of the number of shares and estimated market value of PCS grants based on the next higher performance measure (target or maximum) that exceeds the previous fiscal year's performance. Accordingly, the number of shares and estimated market value for the PCS grants made in 2022 are disclosed assuming they are awarded at the maximum (200%) level and the 2023 PCS grants are disclosed assuming they are awarded at the target (100%) level. The ultimate payout of PCS awards is dependent on Company performance during the remaining measurement period, thus final payout results for unvested grants could be materially different than the results shown above. The market or payout value is estimated using the closing price, $161.78, of our common stock on the last business day of 2023.
| OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2015 YEAR-END |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Option Awards1 | Stock Awards |
| Grant Date | Number of Securities of Underlying Unexercised Options (Exercisable)2
| Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (Unexercisable)
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unearned Options
| Option Exercise Price | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested2
| Market Value of Shares or Units or Stock That Have Not Vested2
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested3,4 | Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested3,4 |
| A. Greig Woodring |
| 2/20/2007 | 31,058 | | | $59.63 | 2/20/2017 | | | | |
| 2/20/2008 | 32,225 | | | $56.03 | 2/20/2018 | | | | |
| 2/18/2009 | 30,127 | | | $32.20 | 2/18/2019 | | | | |
| 2/19/2010 | 46,392 | | | $47.10 | 2/19/2020 | | | | |
| 2/22/2011 | 34,061 | | | $59.74 | 2/22/2021 | | | | |
| 2/28/2012 | 53,991 | | | $56.65 | 2/28/2022 | | | | |
| 2/21/2013 | 51,177 | 17,060 | | $58.77 | 2/21/2023 | | | | |
| 3/7/2014 | 19,550 | 19,551 | | $78.48 | 3/7/2024 | | | 31,852 | $2,724,939 |
| 3/6/2015 | 10,858 | 32,577 | | $90.06 | 3/6/2025 | | | 30,813 | $2,636,052 |
| Jack B. Lay |
| 2/19/2010 | 13,743 | | | $47.10 | 2/19/2020 | | | | |
| 2/22/2011 | 12,489 | | | $59.74 | 2/22/2021 | | | | |
| 2/28/2012 | 16,197 | | | $56.65 | 2/28/2022 | | | | |
| 2/21/2013 | 12,764 | 4,255 | | $58.77 | 2/21/2023 | | | | |
| 3/7/2014 | 4,237 | 4,237 | | $78.48 | 3/7/2024 | | | 6,903 | $590,552 |
| 3/6/2015 | 2,190 | 6,571 | | $90.06 | 3/6/2025 | | | 6,215 | $531,693 |
| Anna Manning |
| 2/20/2007 | 1,181 | | | $59.63 | 2/20/2017 | | | | |
| 2/20/2008 | 1,705 | | | $56.03 | 2/20/2018 | | | | |
| 2/18/2009 | 7,056 | | | $32.20 | 2/18/2019 | | | | |
| 2/19/2010 | 6,336 | | | $47.10 | 2/19/2020 | | | | |
| 2/22/2011 | 8,326 | | | $59.74 | 2/22/2021 | | | | |
| 2/28/2012 | 10,563 | | | $56.65 | 2/28/2022 | | | | |
| 2/21/2013 | 8,407 | 2,803 | | $58.77 | 2/21/2023 | | | | |
| 3/7/2014 | 2,757 | 2,757 | | $78.48 | 3/7/2024 | | | 4,492 | $384,291 |
| 3/6/2015 | 2,085 | 6,255 | | $90.06 | 3/6/2025 | | | 5,916 | $506,114 |
| 12/1/2015 |
| 153,453 | | $93.21 | 12/1/2025 | | |
|
|
| Alain P. Néemeh |
| 2/19/2010 | 9,205 | | | $47.10 | 2/19/2020 | | | | |
| 2/22/2011 | 8,326 | | | $59.74 | 2/22/2021 | | | | |
| 2/28/2012 | 10,563 | | | $56.65 | 2/28/2022 | | | | |
| 2/21/2013 | 8,569 | 2,857 | | $58.77 | 2/21/2023 | | | | |
| 3/7/2014 | 2,757 | 2,757 | | $78.48 | 3/7/2024 | | | 4,492 | $384,291 |
| 3/6/2015 | 2,085 | 6,255 | | $90.06 | 3/6/2025 | | | 5,916 | $506,114 |
| 12/1/2015 |
| 102,302 | | $93.21 | 12/1/2025 | | |
|
|
| Donna H. Kinnaird |
| 4/2/2012 | 11,198 | | | $59.36 | 4/2/2022 | | | | |
| 2/21/2013 | 9,413 | 3,138 | | $58.77 | 2/21/2023 | | | | |
| 3/7/2014 | 3,111 | 3,112 | | $78.48 | 3/7/2024 | | | 5,069 | $433,653 |
| 3/6/2015 | 2,085 | 6,255 | | $90.06 | 3/6/2025 | | | 5,916 | $506,114 |
| 12/1/2015 |
|
| | $93.21 | 12/1/2025 | 6,437 |
| $550,685 |
|
|
| |
1. | Prior to February 2011, the Company granted stock options as the form of our long-term equity incentive awards. The terms and conditions of the stock option grants are substantially similar to our SARs grants. The option awards also used an exercise price that was set at the closing price on the day of the award (the date of the February Committee meeting) and also expire 10 years after grant date. The vesting schedule for grants of stock options was five years, no portion of which vested in the first year, and 25% of which vested at the end of each of the four remaining years. |
| |
2. | This column reflects the number of RSUs granted to Ms. Kinnaird in December 2015, which vest fully on January 11, 2017. See discussion of PCS awards and 2015 Special Grants in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2015 Compensation Actions and Results - 2015 Special Grants." |
| |
3. | Stock options vest and become exercisable in four equal annual installments of 25%, on December 31 of the second, third, fourth and fifth years. SARs, which were first granted in 2011, generally vest over four years (25% of which vests at the end of each of the first four years). The SARs granted on December 1, 2015 to Ms. Manning and Mr. Néemeh will fully vest on November 30, 2020. |
| |
4. | These columns reflect the number of shares and estimated market value of grants of PCS. Because the relative return on equity measure is dependent upon public availability of financial results from our peer companies, our performance for the relative return on equity metric will not be approved by the Compensation Committee until late April 2016, after the filing of this Proxy Statement. Payments will be made in May 2016. These payments will be fully disclosed in our 2017 Proxy Statement. See "SARs and Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2015" for more information on the payout of those awards. SEC rules require disclosure of the number of shares and estimated market value of PCS grants based on the next higher performance measure (target or maximum) that exceeds the previous fiscal year’s performance. Accordingly, the number of shares and estimated market value for the PCS grants made in 2014 are disclosed assuming they are awarded at the target (100%) level and the 2015 are disclosed assuming they are awarded at the target (100%) level. The market or payout value is estimated using the closing price, $85.55, of our common stock on December 31, 2015. The performance period for the 2013-2015 PCS grant was January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015. The performance period for the 2014-2016 PCS grant is January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016. The performance period for the 2015-2017 PCS grant is January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017. |
SARs and Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 20152023
20152023 SARs and Option Exercises -. The following table provides information for the named executive officers regarding SARs and stock option exercises during 2015,2023, including the number of shares acquired upon exercise and the value realized.
2023 SARs and Option Exercises and Stock Vested | 2015 SARS AND OPTION EXERCISES |
| | | | |
Name
| Option and SARs Awards | Stock Awards |
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise
| Value Realized on Exercise
| Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting1
| Value Realized on Vesting1
|
A. Greig Woodring2 | 37,911 | $1,878,773 | 16,653 | $1,537,405 |
Jack B. Lay2 | 49,439 | $2,314,422 | 4,997 | $461,323 |
| Anna Manning | --- | --- | 3,259 | $300,871 |
| Alain P. Néemeh | --- | --- | 3,259 | $300,871 |
| Donna H. Kinnaird | --- | --- | 3,457 | $319,150 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Option and SARs Awards1 | Stock Awards2 |
| Name | Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise | Value Realized
on Exercise | Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting | Value Realized
on Vesting |
| Anna Manning | — | — | 87,064 | $13,379,988 |
| Todd C. Larson | 1,828 | $273,246 | 18,852 | $2,894,567 |
| Tony Cheng | — | — | 8,246 | $1,259,617 |
| Leslie Barbi | — | — | 7,733 | $1,227,830 |
| Ronald Herrmann | 916 | $142,091 | 4,107 | $691,249 |
| |
1. | Since the PCS Relative ROE measure is dependent upon public availability of financial results from our peer companies, our performance for the relative return on equity metric will not be approved by the Compensation Committee until late April 2016, after the filing of this Proxy Statement. The settlement of PCS awards for the 2013-2015 performance period will not be made until May 2016, so this information is not currently available. |
| |
2. | Mr. Woodring exercised 37,911 options on August 14, 2015 with an average market value for the shares of $97.04. Mr. Lay exercised 49,439 options on May 7, 2015 with an average market value for the shares of $92.42. |
1. Mr. Larson exercised 3,848 SARs on May 11, 2023 with an average market price for the shares of $149.49. Mr. Herrmann exercised 4,122 SARs on November 7, 2023 with an average market price for the shares of $155.05.
452. These columns represent amounts paid for the settlement of the 2021 one-time PSU and one-time RSU awards, paid in 2023, the settlement of the PCS awards for the 2021-2023 performance period, paid in 2024, and the settlement of the 2021 RSU awards, paid in 2024.
2012-20142020-2022 Performance Contingent Share Payout - Since. In February 2020, the calculationCommittee established the target and range for the following PCS performance measures: (i) three-year adjusted operating ROE; (ii) three year adjusted operating income and (iii) three-year book value per share, excluding AOCI. These measures were set for the period beginning in 2020 at levels that were consistent with our intermediate-term goals for those measures (prior to the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic being known). The performance period for the 2020 PCS Relative ROE measure is dependent upon public availability of financial results from our peer companies,grant began on January 1, 2020 and ended on December 31, 2022.
In February 2023, the payoutCommittee reviewed the results for the 2012-2014 PCS grants2020-2022 performance period and determined that none of the metrics met the threshold level because of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in no payouts under these awards.
2021 One-Time Award Payout. In March 2021, the Committee determined that a one-time equity award to named executive officers and other executives was necessary for the engagement of our executive team to advance our strategic objectives and to recognize the performance of our leaders in navigating the Company through the COVID-19 pandemic. For the named executive officers, the one-time equity award consisted of two components of equal size:a performance share unit ("PSU") grant and a restricted share unit ("RSU") grant. Vesting of the PSU awards was subject to a performance condition which required the Company to achieve financial results that were not determined until late April 2015 and payments were not made until May 2015, afterwithin a pre-determined range for at least two of the 2015 Proxy Statement was published. Therefore, we are disclosing information regarding that PCS payoutsix metrics used in the following table:2021-2023 PCS plan described in the "2021-2023 PCS Awards" section above. The plan metrics required robust financial performance when considering the ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, with 2022 targets reflecting financial performance that aligned with a pre-pandemic business environment.
In January 2023, the Committee reviewed the results for the PSU grant performance period and determined that the Company achieved at least two of the six performance conditions, resulting in full vesting and payout of these awards at target for individuals employed with the Company on December 31, 2022. No additional amounts were paid due to Company performance exceeding the financial goals.
The RSU component of the 2021 One-Time Award payout vested as of December 31, 2022 and was settled in January 2023.
| 2012-2014 PERFORMANCE CONTINGENT SHARE PAYOUT |
| | | | |
| | Name | Percentage Payout | Number of Shares Acquired on Payout | Value Realized on Payout |
| |
| | A. Greig Woodring | 82.0% | 16,653 | $1,537,405 |
| | Jack B. Lay | 82.0% | 4,997 | $461,323 |
| | Anna Manning | 82.0% | 3,259 | $300,871 |
| | Alain P. Néemeh | 82.0% | 3,259 | $300,871 |
| | Donna H. Kinnaird | 82.0% | 3,457 | $319,150 |
2013-20152021-2023 Performance Contingent Share Payout - Since. For the calculation2021-2023 PCS program, the Committee established specific financial performance metrics for each of 2021 and 2022, with 2023 serving as an additional time vesting period. PCS grants prior to 2021 measured financial performance over a three-year period, but due to the COVID-19 pandemic, uncertain business environment and the inability at the time to reasonably determine metrics for a three-year plan given the pending implementation of LDTI in 2023, the Committee altered the measurement period for the 2021 grants only.
In February 2023, the Committee reviewed the results for the 2021 and 2022 performance periods and determined: (i) for 2021, Adjusted Operating Return on Equity and Adjusted Operating Income did not meet minimum threshold levels and Book Value per Share, Excluding AOCI exceeded target; and (ii) for 2022, Adjusted Operating Return on Equity, Adjusted Operating Income and Book Value per Share, Excluding AOCI exceeded their respective targets.
The total performance factor for the 2021-2023 PCS performance metric was 97.2% which represents the average of the PCS Relative ROE measure is dependent upon public availability2021 and 2022 results. Following the vesting-only third year of financial results fromthese grants in 2023, payouts were made in the first quarter of 2024.
2021 Restricted Stock Unit Payout. In March 2021, the Committee approved the 2021 allocation of Restricted Share Unit ("RSU") awards for our peer companies, our performancenamed executive officer and other company executives. The cliff-vesting schedule for the relative returnannual RSU grant is three years from January 1, 2021. The RSU awards fully vested for individuals employed with the Company on equity metric forDecember 31, 2023 and was settled in shares of the 2013-2015 PCS grants will not be determined until late April 2016 and payments will not be made until May 2016, after the filing of this Proxy Statement. These payments will be fully disclosedCompany's common stock in our 2017 Proxy Statement.January 2024.
Pension Benefits in 20152023
| RETIREMENT PLAN ACCUMULATED BENEFITS |
| | | | |
| Name | Plan Names | Years of Service Credited | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit1 | Payments During Last Fiscal Year |
| A. Greig Woodring | Performance Pension Plan | 36 | $1,280,372 | --- |
| Augmented Benefit Plan | 36 | $13,411,398 | --- |
Supplemental Plan2 | 36 | $499,535 | --- |
| Jack B. Lay | Performance Pension Plan | 24 | $610,952 | --- |
| Augmented Benefit Plan | 24 | $2,649,849 | --- |
| Anna Manning | Group Pension Plan for Canadian Employees of RGA | 9 | $207,728 | --- |
| RGA International Toronto Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) | 9 | $1,807,741 | --- |
| Alain P. Néemeh | Group Pension Plan for Canadian Employees of RGA | 19 | $449,204 | --- |
| RGA Canada Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) | 19 | $2,228,583 | --- |
| Donna H. Kinnaird | Performance Pension Plan | 3 | $85,068 | --- |
| Augmented Benefit Plan | 3 | $283,053 | --- |
| |
1. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Name1 | Plan Names | Years of
Service Credited | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit2 | Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year | | Anna Manning | Performance Pension Plan | 7 | $223,384 | --- | | Augmented Benefit Plan | 7 | $2,259,129 | --- | | RGA Canada Defined Benefit Plan SERP | 9 | $1,520,717 | --- | | Supplemental Payment | 17 | $1,778,646 | --- | | Todd C. Larson | Performance Pension Plan | 28 | $582,394 | --- | | Augmented Benefit Plan | 28 | $2,527,535 | --- | | Tony Cheng | Performance Pension Plan | 4 | $21,050 | --- | | Augmented Benefit Plan | 4 | $714 | --- |
1.Ms. Barbi and Mr. Herrmann are not eligible for the Performance Pension Plan or the pension element of the Augmented Benefit Plan. 2.The accumulated benefit for the U.S. plans is based on service and compensation (as described above) considered by the plans for the period through December 31, 2015. The present value has been calculated assuming the earliest retirement age at which the participant can elect an unreduced benefit. For additional discussion of the assumptions, see note 10 of the Company’s financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC. As described in such note, the interest assumptions for the qualified pension plan, the augmented benefit plan and the supplemental plan are 4.13%, 3.73% and 3.83%, respectively. |
The accumulated benefit for the Canadian registered pension plan is based on service and compensation (base salary and bonus paid)(as described above) considered by the plans for the period through December 31, 2015.2023. The present value has been calculated assuming the earliest retirement age at which the participant can elect an unreduced benefit. For additional discussion of the assumptions, see note 15 of the Company's financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as filed with the SEC. As described in such note, the interest assumptions for the qualified pension plan and the augmented benefit plan are 4.79% and 4.74%, respectively.
For Mr. Cheng, the Performance Pension Plan represents his accrued benefit in the U.S. pension plan prior to his transfer outside of the country in 2002 and for service accrued after his transfer back to the U.S. in 2023.
The accumulated benefit for the Supplemental Payment to Ms. Manning is calculated based on the maximum registered contributions allowedactual retirement benefits accumulated by Ms. Manning to date, as well as a projection of her employer-provided retirement benefits had she been employed in the U.S. since her original hire date with the Company. The
calculation of the accumulated value of the benefit is based on her actual earnings up through December 31, 2023, currency exchange rates effective for each year to convert her Canadian earnings to U.S. dollars, and the net rateassumed annual return on her defined contribution benefits of return reflects the performance of market-related funds4% before 2016, 4.5% for the period described, taking into account applicable investment management fees.
For Canadian executives participatingExecutive Deferred Savings Plan in 2016 and later, and 6% in the Augmented Savings and Savings Plan benefits in 2016 and later.
Ms. Manning's RGA Canada Defined Benefit SERP the accumulated benefit is based on credited service and pensionable earnings upeffective as of her transfer to December 31, 2015. Interest rates: 2.1%the U.S. in 2016. The present value of the accumulated benefit is calculated using an interest rate of 4.5% for the first 10 years and 3.7%4.5% thereafter. Mortality
Performance Pension Account Benefits
The Performance Pension Account Benefit payable to eligible employees, including certain executives, upon termination of employment is the sum of (1) and (2) as follows:
(1) Participants earn base credits for each Year of Accrual Service (as defined below) completed under the plan. The credit is a percentage of the employee's Final Average Annual Compensation (as defined below) based on the participant's age on January 1 of the Pension Plan year.
(2) Additional excess compensation credits are earned on Final Average Annual Compensation that is greater than 60% of the prevailing Social Security Wage Base (as defined below), rounded to the next $100.
See table used: CPM2014 Fully Generationalbelow for detail on base and excess compensation credits:
| | | | | | | | |
| Excess Compensation Credits |
Age on January 1 of the
Plan Year in which
the Year of Accrual Service is Earned | Base Credits - Percentage of Final
Average Annual Compensation Credited | Excess Compensation Credits - Percentage of Final Average Annual Compensation Credited |
| Up to 35 | 2% | 1% |
| 35 – 44 | 4% | 2% |
| 45 – 54 | 6% | 3% |
| 55 or over | 8% | 4% |
Pension Plan participants with Improvement Scale CPM-B.a Performance Pension Account Benefit may elect to receive their Performance Pension Account Benefit as a lump sum or an annuity at any time after termination of employment, subject to the three-year vesting requirement of the plan.
| | | | | |
| Performance Pension Account Definitions |
| 2.Definition |
| Final Average Annual Compensation | Until January 1, 1994, we also maintainedThe average of compensation received (base salary and ABP award) during the 5 consecutive years of accrual service within the last 10 calendar year period immediately preceding termination of employment which produces the highest average amount (or during all the years of accrual service if less than 5). |
| Year of Accrual Service | A year is credited for each plan year after an Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (the "Supplemental Plan"),employee becomes a nonqualified defined benefit plan pursuant toparticipant in which eligible executive officers are entitled to receive additional retirement benefits. Benefits under the Supplemental Plan were frozen asparticipant is credited with at least 1,000 hours of January 1, 1994. The frozen annual benefit payable upon retirement at age 65 is $3,060 for Mr. Woodring. Retirement benefits under the Supplemental Plan are payable at age 65 in the form of a 15-year certain life annuity, with no direct or indirect integration with service. |
Social Security benefits.Wage Base | For any year the maximum amount of compensation which may be considered wages for such year for purposes of assessing Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) taxes. |
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 20152023
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2023 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation |
Name
| Executive Contributions in Last FY1 | Registrant Contributions in Last FY2 | Aggregate Earnings in Last FY3 | Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE4 |
| Anna Manning | $223,593 | $156,052 | $85,637 | $— | $2,062,087 |
| Todd C. Larson | $107,379 | $69,861 | $107,539 | $— | $1,560,131 |
| Tony Cheng | $15,865 | $— | $1,300 | $— | $17,166 |
| Leslie Barbi | $62,452 | $110,328 | $33,041 | $— | $541,285 |
| Ronald Herrmann | $51,969 | $98,194 | $23,009 | $— | $292,766 |
1. The amounts in this column are also included in the Summary Compensation Table in the "Salary" column (i.e., contributions to the Executive Deferred Savings Plan).
2. The amounts in this column reflect 2022 contributions credited to the participant's account during 2023. For reasons related to the timing of the contributions, the amounts will not match the amounts in the Summary Compensation Table's "All Other Compensation" column, which are contributions for 2023 which are actually made in 2024.
3. Reflects earnings credited to the participant's account during 2023 in connection with the investment selections chosen from time to time by the participant.
4. The aggregate balance at last fiscal year-end column reflects the following amounts that were reported in the Summary Compensation Table in 2022 for Ms. Manning in the amount of $1,596,805, Mr. Larson in the amount of $1,275,351, Ms. Barbi in the amount of $335,464, and Mr. Herrmann in the amount of $119,594.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity Plans |
| Plan Category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights1 | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights2,3 | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))4 |
| (a) | (b) | (c) |
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 2,679,874 | | $ | 118.70 | | 1,347,133 | |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | | — | | — | |
| Total | 2,679,874 | | $118.70 (2)(3) | 1,347,133 | |
1.Includes the number of securities to be issued upon exercises or settlement of stock appreciation rights, restricted units and performance contingent shares under the following plans: Flexible Stock Plan – 2,647,541; Director Flexible Stock Plan – 0; and Phantom Stock Plan for Directors – 32,333. The number of performance contingent shares represents the number of shares that would be issued based on target performance, reduced for cancellations and adjustments through December 31, 2023. The actual number of shares issued at the end of each performance period will range between 0% and 200% of the target number of units granted, based on a measure of the actual performance of the Company relative to stated goals.
2.Does not include 359,551 performance contingent shares outstanding and 417,408 restricted units outstanding under the Flexible Stock Plan; 0 outstanding under the Flexible Stock Plan for Directors and 32,333 phantom units outstanding under the Phantom Stock Plan for Directors because those securities do not have an exercise price (i.e., a unit is a hypothetical share of Company common stock with a value equal to the fair market value of the common stock).
3.Reflects the blended weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options under the Flexible Stock Plan.
| 2015 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION |
| | | | | |
Name
| Executive Contributions in Last FY1 | Registrant Contributions in Last FY2 | Aggregate Earnings in Last FY3 | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions4 | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE5 |
| A. Greig Woodring | --- | $35,513 | $2,619 | --- | $1,152,779 |
| Jack B. Lay | $74,277 | $35,515 | $50,024 | (20,792) | $1,675,907 |
| Anna Manning | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Alain P. Néemeh | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Donna H. Kinnaird | --- | $27,613 | $4,261 | --- | $94,977 |
Other Executive Compensation Matters | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1.The amounts in this column are also included in the Summary Compensation Table in the salary column (i.e., contributions to the EDSP). |
| |
2. | The amounts in this column reflect 2014 contributions credited to the participant’s account during 2015. For reasons related to the timing of the contributions, the amounts will not match the amounts in the Summary Compensation Table’s "All Other Compensation" column, which are contributions for 2015 credited in 2016. All amounts represent contributions in the Augmented Plan except for Mr. Lay – $25,368 and Ms. Kinnaird – $19,723, which was a contribution to the EDSP.
|
| |
3. | Reflects earnings credited to the participant’s account during 2015 in connection with the investment selections chosen from time to time by the participant. Mr. Woodring’s amounts represents earnings exclusively in the Augmented Plan. Amounts for Mr. Lay and Ms. Kinnaird represent earnings in the Augmented and EDSP plans. |
| |
4. | The amount in this column represents a distribution to Mr. Lay from his EDSP account in compliance with IRS regulations that govern non-qualified plans. |
| |
5. | The aggregate balance at last fiscal year-end column reflects the following amounts that were reported in the Summary Compensation Table in previous years: Mr. Woodring – $1,114,647; Mr. Lay – $1,536,883, Ms. Kinnaird – $63,104.
|
OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION MATTERS
Additional Compensation Disclosures
Generally No Employment or Severance Agreements.
We do not have employment, severance or change-in-controlchange of control agreements with any of our U.S. named executive officers. The Company had an employment agreement with Mr. Cheng until he relocated from Hong Kong to the U.S., which is standard practice for international employees at his seniority in Hong Kong. That agreement was terminated upon his relocation to the U.S. on July 14, 2023.
Perquisites.
We do not provide personal-benefit perquisites to our U.S. named executive officers or their families, such as airplanes, cars or apartments, and we do not reimburse these executive officers or any of oursuch employees for personal-benefit perquisites such as club dues or other social memberships. In some countries outside North America, it is our practice to provide remuneration and benefit packages that are competitive against the local or regional market to senior leaders, such as housing, club and car allowances. Executive officers and other employees may seek reimbursement for business-related expenses in accordance with our business expense reimbursement policy. Mr. Cheng received local market-competitive allowances for education and housing while he was employed in Hong Kong. Mr. Cheng no longer receives these allowances following his relocation to the U.S.
Compensation Recovery.
Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, in the event ofupon misconduct that results in a financial restatement that would have reduced a previously paid incentive amount, we can recoup those improper payments from our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
In 2023, we adopted a new NYSE Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy to comply with NYSE listing standards (the "NYSE Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy") adopted pursuant to final SEC rules. The NYSE Executive Recoupment Policy requires the Company to clawback certain incentive compensation paid to current or former Company officers (as defined in the applicable SEC rule and NYSE Listing Standard) if the Company restates a previous financial statement to correct a material misstatement in such financial statement, or to correct an error that would be a material misstatement in the current period if not corrected or was corrected in the current period. Clawback of the incentive compensation in such situations is mandatory irrespective of whether the restatement was the result of an act or omission by such officer.
Additionally, our Executive Incentive Recoupment Policy permits the Company to recoup all or a portion of incentive awards paid to certain executives upon the occurrence of certain recoupment events. Such events include: (i) a financial restatement due to the material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the federal securities laws; (ii) receiving an incentive award based on materially inaccurate financial statements or any other materially inaccurate performance; (iii) causing injury to the interests or business reputation of the Company or of a business unitunit; and (iv) a material violation of the Company’s PrinciplesCompany's Code of Ethical Business Conduct. The Company can recoup incentive awards for up to four years following the payment of an award. The policy applies to an identified group of current orand former officers and employees of the Company, as determined by the Board or the Compensation Committee from
time to time based on position, responsibility, level, title, business unit and/or compensation. The Compensation Committee has express authority to interpret and administer the policy and to make all determinations with respect to the policy in its sole discretion. Recoupment of awards under one policy precludes recoupment of awards under the other policy.
Deductibility of Compensation.
The goalCommittee believes that a significant portion of our executive officers' compensation should be tied to measures of performance of our business. While the Compensation Committee isconsiders the tax deductibility of awards as one factor in determining executive compensation, it also looks at other factors in making its decisions and retains the flexibility to complyaward compensation that it determines to be consistent with the requirementsgoals of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m), toour executive compensation program even if the extent deemed practicable, with respect to annual and long-term incentive programs to avoid losing the deductionawards are not deductible for non-performance based compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to our Chief Executive Officer and the three other most highly-compensated employees (other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer), subject to any restrictions under the Code or any guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service applicable to the tax year at issue. We generally structure our performance-based compensation plans with the objective that amounts paid under those plans and arrangements are tax deductible, including having the possible performance goals approved by the shareholders. purposes.
Termination or Change of Control Payments
As described above, the named executive officers generally do not have employment, severance or change of control agreements with the Company. The information below describes and quantifies certain compensation that may or will become payable under existing plans and agreements if the named executive officer’sofficer's employment had terminated on or by December 31, 2015,2023, due to a change of control, disability or death, given the executive’sexecutive's compensation and service levels as of such date and, wherewhen applicable, based on the Company's closing stock price on December 31, 20152023 or actual date of disability, death, etc. These benefits are in addition to benefits available generally to salaried employees such as distributions under the 401(k) and pension plans, retiree medical benefits, disability benefits and accrued vacation pay.
Change of Control. Upon the occurrence of
In connection with a change of control (as defined below), the Compensation Committee has the authority to fully vest any unvested stock options or SARs granted before the change of control if the Committee determines such vesting is necessary to protect the rights of the named executive officers and other executives following such change of control. Our Flexible Stock Plan and stock option grantaward agreements provide that the Compensation Committee may (i) accelerate the vesting periods, or(ii) arrange for usthe Company to purchase the options so the named executive officer receives the value that he or she would have attained had the option been currently exercisable.exercisable, (iii) make such adjustments to the options then outstanding as the Committee deems appropriate to reflect such change of control or (iv) cause the options then outstanding to be assumed, or new options substituted therefore, by the surviving corporation in such change. Our SARs agreements allow awards to automatically accelerate upon a change of control, subject in all cases to the Committee's authority to, among other actions, adjust such awards or cause them to be assumed by the surviving corporation in such change (as described above). In addition, our Flexible Stock Plan and PCS grant agreements provide that upon a change of control, as soon as practicable following the end of the applicable three-year performance period, we must deliver to the named executive officer the number of shares that coincides with the target award for each outstanding grant of PCS.
Disability or Death.
If one of the named executive officers were to become disabled or die, the vesting of any unvested stock options and SARs granted before the date of such event would immediately vest and become exercisable.may be accelerated in the Committee's sole discretion. In addition, he or she would receive a pro rata proportion of the shares of common stock that would have been issued under any award of PCS before 2023 at the end of the three-year performance period. Beginning in 2023, upon the death of a named executive officer, a pro rata proportion of the target payment will be paid within a reasonable amount of time. The pro rata proportion is determined based on the number of calendar months in the performance period during
which he or she was employed, divided by 36 months (the total number of months in the three-year performance period); however,. To the PCS award grantedextent that the transfer of one of the named executive officers' stock options and SARs is permitted at death by the Flexible Stock Plan or under another agreement, (i) the named executive officer's stock options and SARs shall be transferable to Mr. Woodring in 2016 vests over 12 months, so the denominator inbeneficiary, if any, designated on forms prescribed by and filed with the Committee and (ii) upon the death of the named executive officer, such calculation wouldbeneficiary shall succeed to the rights of the deceased to the extent permitted by law and the Flexible Stock Plan. If no such designation of a beneficiary has been made, the named executive officer's legal representative shall succeed to the options and SARs, which shall be 12.transferable by will or pursuant to laws of descent and distribution to the extent permitted by the Flexible Stock Plan or under another agreement.
Retirement.
Upon the "retirement"retirement (as defined below) of a named executive officer, unvested stock options and SARs do not accelerate but continue towill vest 100% in accordance with the vesting schedule and provisionsprovision specified in the respective option grant agreement(s). Upon retirement, the pro rata distribution provisions described above under "Disability or Death" apply to any PCS grants. Due to the number of factors that affect the nature, amount and timing of the vesting and exercise of stock options or SARs, or the actual award following a PCS performance period, the amounts paid to or received by the named executive officer may differ and are undeterminableindeterminable until actually realized.
The named executive officers may participate in deferred compensation plans that permit deferral of certain compensation. They may also participate in our defined contribution and defined benefit retirement plans. The last column of the table under "Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in Fiscal 2015"2023" reports each named executive’sexecutive's aggregate balance at as of December 31, 2015,2023, under each nonqualified deferred compensation or defined contribution plan. The named executive officers are entitled to receive the amount in their deferred compensation account in the event ofupon termination of employment or retirement.reaching a certain date selected by the executive at the time when they elect to defer compensation. The table under "Pension"Compensation Tables - Pension Benefits in Fiscal 2015"2023" describes the general terms of each pension plan in which the named executive officers participate, the years of credited service and the present value of each named executive officer’sofficer's accumulated pension benefit.
Definitions. "Change
"Change of Control"Control" is defined in our Flexible Stock Plan and, for this discussion, means (i) the acquisition, without Board approval, of more than 20% of ourthe Company's outstanding common shares through a tender offer, exchange offer or otherwise, (ii) ourthe Company's liquidation or dissolution following a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, (iii) a merger or consolidation involving usthe Company which results in usthe Company not being the surviving corporation or (iv) a change in the majority of the members of ourthe Board of Directors during any two-year period not approved by at least two-thirds of the directors who were members at the beginning of the two-year period.
"Retirement"Retirement" is defined in the respective equity incentive grant agreements and means termination of employment status after the participant has attained a combination of age and years of service that equals at least 65; provided that the minimum number of years of service credited is five and the maximum number of years of service credited for purposes of this calculation shall be ten. Thus, the named executive officers who have attained age 55 and have 10 years of service satisfy the definition and are eligible for the benefits described above associated with retirement. Atretirement as of December 31, 2015, the named executive officers who satisfied this requirement were Messrs. Woodring2023, include Ms. Manning and Lay.
The following table provides the value of equity awards that wouldcould accelerate and become exercisable or vested upon the occurrence of a change of control or if the named executive officer had become disabled or died as of December 31, 2015.2023. The value calculations are based upon our closing stock price as ofDecember 31, 2015 ($85.55), the last business day of the year,2023 ($161.78) and in the case of options reflect the payment of the respective option exercise price.
| VALUE OF EQUITY AWARDS UPON CHANGE OF CONTROL |
| | | | |
Name
| Change of Control | Disability or Death |
Options/SARs
| PCS/RSU (full award at target) | Options/SARs
| PCS/RSU (pro rata) |
| A. Greig Woodring | $595,092 | $5,360,991 | $595,092 | $2,695,313 |
| Jack B. Lay | $143,904 | $1,122,245 | $143,904 | $570,934 |
| Anna Manning | $94,556 | $890,404 | $94,556 | $424,894 |
| Alain P. Néemeh | $96,002 | $890,404 | $96,002 | $424,894 |
| Donna H. Kinnaird | $106,037 | $939,7671 | $106,037 | $1,008,4901 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name
| Change of Control1 | Disability or Death |
| Options/SARs | PCS/RSU
(full award at target) | Options/SARs | PCS/RSU
(pro rata) |
| Anna Manning | $1,750,079 | $15,713,853 | $1,750,079 | $7,603,168 |
| Todd C. Larson | $558,799 | $3,590,545 | $558,799 | $1,758,891 |
| Tony Cheng | $394,855 | $2,686,680 | $394,855 | $1,186,924 |
| Leslie Barbi | $411,627 | $2,536,062 | $411,627 | $1,299,626 |
| Ronald Herrmann | $285,826 | $2,906,702 | $285,826 | $2,010,641 |
1Payment upon a change of control is subject, in all cases, to the Committee's authority to, among other actions, adjust such awards or cause them to be assumed by the surviving corporation in such change (as described above). |
Pay Versus Performance
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K (the "pay versus performance rules"), we are providing information showing the relationship between executive compensation actually paid (as defined in the SEC rules) and the Company's financial performance. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee did not consider this disclosure when making compensation decisions. Further information about how we align executive compensation with Company performance can be found above under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis." For purposes of the disclosure below:
•Ms. Manning, our former Chief Executive Officer, was the Company's principal executive officer during 2023 ("PEO");
•"Compensation Actually Paid" ("CAP") adheres to the requirements set forth in Regulation S-K Item 402(v), which differs from the calculation methodology used to prepare the Summary Compensation Table and also do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Ms. Manning or our other named executive officers during the applicable year;
•"TSR" is total shareholder return;
•The peer group used to calculate Peer Group TSR is the S&P Life & Health Insurance sub-index; and
•Trailing 12-month adjusted operating return on equity is the Company-selected performance measure.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pay Versus Performance Table |
| Year | Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO1 | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO2,8 | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO Named Executive Officers3 | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO Named Executive Officers4,8 | Value of initial fixed $100 investment based on: | Net Income7 (millions) | Company-Selected Performance Measure: Trailing 12 Month Adjusted Operating Return on Equity7 |
TSR5 | Peer Group TSR6 |
| 2023 | $13,534,431 | $20,003,838 | $4,685,824 | $5,914,312 | $109.37 | $142.87 | $902 | 14.5% |
| 2022 | $11,354,662 | $19,808,104 | $3,114,364 | $4,238,584 | $93.97 | $136.53 | $623 | 10.3% |
| 2021 | $16,109,515 | $9,495,022 | $3,249,851 | $2,356,848 | $70.64 | $123.73 | $617 | 0.8% |
| 2020 | $9,044,233 | $(2,529,957) | $2,491,515 | $420,220 | $72.98 | $90.52 | $415 | 5.7% |
1The dollar amounts reported for Ms. Manning under "Summary Compensation Table Total" are the amounts of total compensation reported for Ms. Manning for each corresponding year in the "Total" column of the Summary Compensation Table as reflected on page 58. |
2The dollar amounts reported for Ms. Manning under "Compensation Actually Paid" represent the amount of compensation actually paid to Ms. Manning as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regular S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Ms. Manning during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the adjustments in the table below were made to Ms. Manning's total compensation for each year to determine the compensation actually paid. See "Compensation Actually Paid to PEO" table below for additional information. |
3The dollar amounts reported under "Average Summary Compensation Total" for non-PEO NEOs represent the average of the amounts reported for the Company's named executive officers ("NEOs") as a group (excluding any individual serving as our CEO for such year) in the "Total" column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. The names of the NEOs included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: (i) for 2022 and 2023, Todd Larson, Tony Cheng, Leslie Barbi and Ronald Herrmann; (ii) for 2021, Todd Larson, Tony Cheng, Leslie Barbi, Ronald Herrmann and Alain Néemeh; and (iii) for 2020, Todd Larson, Tony Cheng, Leslie Barbi, Alain Néemeh and John Laughlin. |
4The dollar amounts reported under "Average Compensation Actually Paid" for non-PEO NEOs represent the average amount of compensation actually paid to the NEOs as a group (excluding the CEO), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or paid to the NEOs as a group during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the adjustments in the table below were made to the NEOs' total compensation for each year to determine the compensation actually paid. See "Compensation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs" table below for additional information. |
5Cumulative TSR is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment and the difference between the Company's share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company's share price at the beginning of the measurement period. |
6Represents the weighted peer group TSR, weighted according to the respective companies' stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The peer group used for this purpose is the S&P Life & Health Insurance sub-index. |
7See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 86 for reconciliations from GAAP figures to adjusted operating figures. |
8The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the equity awards did not differ in any material respect from the assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value of the awards as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, except that the fair value calculations of (i) the options granted on or between March 6, 2020 and March 9, 2023 used an estimated term between 2.3 years and 4.6 years in FY23, as compared to an estimated term of 6.25 years to 7.00 years used to calculate the grant date fair value of such awards, and (ii) the FY21-23 PSU assumed a payout below target, the FY22-24 PSU assumed a payout above target, and the FY23-25 PSU assumed a payout at target in FY23, in each case as compared to the grant date fair value calculations which assumed a payout at target. |
| | | | | | |
| Compensation Actually Paid to PEO |
| 1.PEO |
| 2023 | | Includes
| Total Compensation as reported in Summary Compensation Table ("SCT") | $ | 13,534,431 | | |
Minus Pension values reported in SCT | 959,479 | | |
Minus Fair value of equity awards granted during fiscal year | 7,350,004 | | |
Plus Pension value attributable to current year's service and any change in pension value attributable to plan amendments made in the numbercurrent year | 936,937 | | |
Plus Fair value of Restricted Share Unitsequity compensation granted in current year - value at end of year-end | 8,504,645 | | |
Plus Fair value of equity compensation granted in current year - vesting date value | — | | |
Plus Change in fair value for end of prior fiscal year to Ms. Kinnairdvesting date for awards made in prior fiscal years that vested during current fiscal year | 460,414 | | |
Plus Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to end of current fiscal year for awards made in prior fiscal years that were unvested at end of current fiscal year | 4,876,894 | | |
Plus Dividends or other earnings paid on December 1, 2015, which vest fullystock or options awards in the covered fiscal year prior to the vesting date that are not otherwise included in the total compensation for the covered fiscal year | — | | |
Plus Fair value of awards forfeited in current fiscal year determined at end of prior fiscal year | — | | |
| Compensation Actually Paid to PEO | $ | 20,003,838 | | |
| | |
| Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs |
| Non-PEO NEO Averages |
| 2023 | |
| Total Compensation as reported in Summary Compensation Table ("SCT") | $ | 4,685,824 | | |
Minus Pension values reported in SCT | 121,970 | | |
Minus Fair value of equity awards granted during fiscal year | 1,579,385 | | |
Plus Pension value attributable to current year's service and any change in pension value attributable to plan amendments made in the current year | 121,970 | | |
Plus Fair value of equity compensation granted in current year - value at end of year-end | 1,765,495 | | |
Plus Fair value of equity compensation granted in current year - vesting date value | 113,615 | | |
Plus Change in fair value for end of prior fiscal year to vesting date for awards made in prior fiscal years that vested during current fiscal year | 67,176 | | |
Plus Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to end of current fiscal year for awards made in prior fiscal years that were unvested at end of current fiscal year | 861,587 | | |
Plus Dividends or other earnings paid on stock or options awards in the covered fiscal year prior to the vesting date that are not otherwise included in the total compensation for the covered fiscal year | — | | |
Plus Fair value of awards forfeited in current fiscal year determined at end of prior fiscal year | — | | |
| Average Compensation Actually Paid to non-PEO NEOs | $ | 5,914,312 | | |
Financial Performance Measures
As described above under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," the philosophy and objectives of our executive compensation programs include creating incentives that will focus executives on, and reward for increasing long-term shareholder value and aligning the long-term financial interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. As explained in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," the most important financial measures used by the Company to link compensation actually
paid (as defined by SEC rules) to the Company's named executive officers for the most recently completed fiscal year to the Company's performance are:
•Trailing 12 Month Adjusted Operating Return on Equity;
•Revenue;
•Adjusted Earnings per Share;
•New Business Embedded Value; and
•Book Value per Share, excluding AOCI
Analysis of Pay versus Performance Table Information
As described in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" above, the Company uses several measures to align executive compensation with Company performance. Not all of such measures are presented in the Pay versus Performance table above. Additionally, as discussed in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," the Company's executive compensation philosophy generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance. Therefore, the Company does not specifically align performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as defined by SEC rules) for any single year. In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following graphical descriptions showing certain information presented in the table above.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
*TSR figures represent cumulative amount of $100 invested in Company common stock on January 11, 2017. See discussion of PCS awards and 2015 Special Grants in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2015 Compensation Actions and Results - 2015 Special Grants."1, 2020. |
ITEM 2 – SHAREHOLDERS’ ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
†See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" on page 86 for reconciliations from GAAP figures to adjusted operating figures. |
CEO Pay Ratio
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enablesand Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K (the "pay ratio rules"), we are providing information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our shareholdersemployees and the annual total compensation of Ms. Manning, our Chief Executive Officer (our "CEO") during 2023. This regulation requires the Company to voteidentify our median employee by using consistently applied compensation measures and then determine the ratio of our CEO's total annual compensation to approve, on an advisory basis (i.e., non-binding), the compensation of this employee. The pay ratio information included in this disclosure is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the named executive officerspay ratio rules.
The pay ratio rules permit the use of a determined median employee for up to three years, unless there has been a meaningful change to the Company's employee population, or a change in employee compensation arrangements such that the Company believes would result in a significant modification to the pay ratio disclosure.
During the 2023 fiscal year there was no significant change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we reasonably believe would result in a significant change to our pay ratio disclosure. Therefore, we chose to use the same median employee identified and disclosed in the Company's 2023 proxy statement. This median employee was selected from those individuals whose compensation is determined by the Company, which includes all of our regular employees, temporary fixed-term employees, temporary student employees, interns and co-op
employees who were working for the Company on October 31, 2023. As of October 31, 2023, there were 4,000 individuals working for the parent company and consolidated subsidiaries worldwide.
We used base salary and ABP payments to calculate our median employee, as disclosedthese compensation measures apply consistently to all employees, across all locations of our employee population. The base salary of any permanent full-time employee who did not work the full year was annualized. We did not make any cost-of-living adjustments for non-U.S. employees in determining each employees' annual compensation. For foreign employees, a year-to-date average exchange rate was used for base salary and the spot rate for March 1, 2023 was used for the ABP payment.
We combined all of the elements of the median employee's compensation for 2023, in accordance with the requirements of the pay ratio rules, resulting in annual total compensation of $145,751. The annual total compensation of our CEO as reported in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement, pursuant to Item 402was $13,534,431 in 2023. Based on this information, for 2023 the ratio of Regulation S-K (including in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, compensation tables and accompanying narrative disclosures).
The Company has a "pay-for-performance" philosophy that forms the foundation of all decisions regardingannual total compensation of the named executive officers. This compensation philosophy, and the program structure approved by the Compensation Committee, is centralour CEO as compared to our ability to attract, retain and motivate individuals who can achieve superior financial results. Please refer to "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Overview" for an overview of the compensation of the named executive officers.A primary focus of the Compensation Committee is whether the Company’s executive compensation program serves the best interests of the Company’s shareholders. At the Company’s 2015 Annual Meeting, a significant majority (98.3% of votes cast on the proposal) of our shareholders approved the compensation program described in the proxy statement for that meeting. This is consistent with our shareholder feedback at our previous annual meetings:median employee was 93:1.
|
| |
| Annual Meeting Year | Percentage of Votes Cast in Favor of "Say on Pay" |
| 2015 | 98% |
| 2014 | 97% |
| 2013 | 99% |
| 2012 | 96% |
| 2011 | 92% |
As part of its ongoing review of our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee took the votes into consideration, along with an overall review of the compensation program, when making compensation decisions for 2015 and 2016. The Compensation Committee determined that the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, objectives and elements continue to be appropriate.
We are asking our shareholders to approve the compensation of the named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the "Compensation
Discussion and Analysis" and "Compensation Tables and Other Matters" discussions. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of the named executive officers and the policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. This vote is advisory and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will carefully consider those shareholders’ concerns when making future compensation decisions for the named executive officers and will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.
Vote Required
If a quorum is present, the vote required to approve this Item 2 is a majority of the common stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR the proposal to approve the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion.
AUDIT MATTERS
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our 2015 audited financial statements with Company executives. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed as required by auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"), SEC Rule 2-07 of Regulation S-X, Statement of Auditing Standards ("SAS") No. 114, "The Auditor’s Communication With Those Charged With Governance." The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB Rule 3526, and has discussed with those accountants their independence. Based on those reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, for filing with the SEC. This report is provided by the following independent directors, who comprise the Audit Committee:
William J. Bartlett, Chairman
Arnoud W.A. Boot
John F. Danahy
Christine R. Detrick
ITEM 3 - RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
The third item to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting is the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates (collectively, "Deloitte") as the Company’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte subject to shareholder ratification. Deloitte has served as independent auditor of the Company since 2000. Its long-term knowledge of the Company and its
subsidiaries, combined with its insurance industry expertise, has enabled it to carry out its audits of the Company’s financial statements with effectiveness and efficiency.
In considering Deloitte’s appointment, the Audit Committee reviewed the firm’s qualifications and competencies, including the following factors:
Deloitte’s status as a registered public accounting firm with the PCAOB, as required by Sarbanes-Oxley and the Rules of the PCAOB;
Deloitte’s independence and its processes for maintaining its independence;
the results of the independent review of the firm’s quality control system;
the key members of the engagement team for the audit of the Company’s financial statements;
Deloitte’s approach to resolving significant accounting and auditing matters including consultation with the firm’s national office; and
Deloitte’s reputation for integrity and competence in the fields of accounting and auditing.
The Audit Committee assures the regular rotation of the audit engagement team partners as required by law. The Audit Committee approves Deloitte’s audit and non-audit services in advance as required under Sarbanes-Oxley and SEC rules. Under procedures adopted by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee reviews, on an annual basis, a schedule of particular audit services that the Company expects to be performed and an estimated amount of fees for each particular audit service. The Audit Committee also reviews a schedule of audit-related, tax and other permitted non-audit services that the Company may engage the independent auditor to perform and an estimated amount of fees for each of those services.
All audit related services, tax services and other services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which concluded that the provision of such services by Deloitte was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions. The Audit Committee has adopted a Pre-Approval Policy which provides for pre-approval of audit, audit-related and tax services on an annual basis and, in addition, individual engagements anticipated to exceed pre-established thresholds must be separately approved. The policy authorizes the Committee to delegate to one or more of its members pre-approval authority with respect to permitted services.
Representatives of Deloitte will attend the 2016 Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and they will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The aggregate fees billed to us for the years ending December 31, 2015 and 2014 by Deloitte are set forth below. These fees have been approved by the Company’s Audit Committee in accordance with its Pre-Approval Policy.
| AUDITOR FEES |
| | | |
| Fee | Fiscal Year |
| 2015 | 2014 |
Audit Fees1 | $7,850,488 | $7,424,899 |
Audit Related Fees2 | 430,000 |
| 430,527 |
| Total audit and audit-related fees | 8,280,488 |
| 7,855,426 |
Tax Fees3 | 55,848 |
| 210,827 |
Other4 | — |
| 166,850 |
| Total Fees | $8,336,336 | $8,233,103 |
| |
1. | Includes fees for the audit of our Company’s and its subsidiaries’ annual financial statements, reviews of our quarterly financial statements and Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 attestation. |
| |
2. | Includes fees for services rendered by Deloitte for matters such as assistance with internal control reporting requirements, certain accounting consultations on potential acquisition and reinsurance transactions and services associated with SEC registration statements, periodic reports and securities offerings. |
| |
3. | Includes fees for tax services rendered by Deloitte such as consultation related to tax planning and compliance. |
| |
4. | Includes fees for other types of permitted services rendered by Deloitte for matters such as non-attest related assessments in 2014. |
Vote Required
If a quorum is present, the vote required to approve this Item 3 is a majority of the common stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors has approved the proposal regarding the appointment of Deloitte and recommends that shareholders vote FOR the proposal.
STOCK OWNERSHIP
SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Beneficial Ownership Table
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2015,2023, certain information with respect to: (1) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding common stock and (2) the ownership of common stock by (i) each of our directors and nominees, (ii) each of our named executive officers and (iii) all directors, nominees and executive officers as a group.
Beneficial Ownership as of December 31, 2023 | BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015 | | | | | | | |
| | |
| Beneficial Owner | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership1 | Percent of Class2 |
| Significant Shareholders | | |
Blackrock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
| 7,608,0803 | 4,863,6673
| 7.46%11.50% |
The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355 | 7,286,1814 | 11.06% |
| FMR LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
| 5,575,2535 | 4,648,3114
| 7.13%8.46% |
Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
| 4,606,9025
| 7.07% |
| Directors, Nominees and Named Executive Officers: | | |
| Non-Employee Directors | | |
| Pina Albo | 1,072 | * |
Non-Employee DirectorsMichele Bang | — | * |
WilliamJohn J. BartlettGauthier | 16,3628,7596 | * |
Arnoud W.A. BootPatricia L. Guinn | 6,9629,192 | * |
John F. DanahyHazel M. McNeilage | 13,8626
527 | * |
Christine R. DetrickGeorge Nichols III | 3,2872,352 | * |
J. Cliff EasonStephen O'Hearn (Chair) | 15,825— | * |
Alan C. HendersonShundrawn Thomas | 24,8587
3,454 | * |
Joyce A. PhillipsKhanh T. Tran | 3,2871,072 | * |
Frederick J. SievertSteven C. Van Wyk | 16,6629897 | * |
Stanley B. Tulin | 6,737 | * |
| Named Executive Officers | | |
| Anna Manning | 536,3788 | * |
A. Greig WoodringTodd C. Larson | 481,7758114,7809
| * |
Jack B. LayTony Cheng | 101,156955,82110
| * |
Anna ManningLeslie Barbi | 56,4911027,64711
| * |
Alain P. NéemehRonald Herrmann | 72,384115,70212
| * |
Donna H. Kinnaird | 27,83312
| * |
All directors and executive officers as a group (17(20 persons) | 959,738898,22313
| 1.47%1.37% |
*Less than 1%.
| |
1. |
1.For purposes of this table, "beneficial ownership" is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, pursuant to which a person or group of persons is deemed to have "beneficial ownership" of any shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days. For computing the percentage of the class of securities held by each person or group of persons named above, any shares which such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days (as well as the shares of common stock underlying fully vested stock options or SARs) are deemed to be outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of such person or group but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days. For computing the percentage of the class of securities held by each person or group of persons named above, any shares which such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days (as well as the shares of common stock underlying fully vested stock options or SARs) are deemed to be outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of such person or group but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any |
other person or group. No director, nominee or named executive officer owns more than 1% of our outstanding common stock.
2. Unless otherwise indicated, each named person has sole voting and investment power over the shares listed as beneficially owned and none of the shares listed are pledged as security.
3. As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed January 30, 2024, Blackrock, Inc. and funds and accounts managed by Blackrock, Inc. and its subsidiaries have sole voting power over 7,086,528 shares and sole dispositive power over 7,608,080 shares.
4. As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed February 13, 2024, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and its affiliates have shared voting power over 29,221 shares, shared dispositive power over 99,849 shares, and sole dispositive power over 7,186,332 shares.
5. As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed February 9, 2024, FMR LLC and its affiliates have sole voting power over 5,383,771 shares and dispositive power over 5,575,253 shares.
6. Mr. Gauthier has joint ownership and shares voting and investment power with his spouse over all shares of common stock.
7. Mr. Van Wyk has joint ownership and shares voting and investment power with his spouse over all shares of common stock.
8. Includes for Ms. Manning 450,107 shares of common stock subject to restricted share units and/or SARs that are exercisable within 60 days.
9. Includes for Mr. Larson 71,104 shares of common stock subject to stock options, restricted share units and/or SARs that are exercisable within 60 days. Mr. Larson shares voting and investment power for 4,928 shares with his spouse.
10. Includes for Mr. Cheng 35,683 shares of common stock subject to restricted share units and/or SARs that are exercisable within 60 days.
11. Includes for Ms. Barbi 25,469 shares of common stock subject to restricted share units and/or SARs that are exercisable within 60 days.
12. Includes for Mr. Herrmann 5,262 shares of common stock subject to restricted share units and/or SARs that are exercisable within 60 days.
13. Includes 662,551 shares of common stock subject to stock options, restricted share units and/or SARs that are exercisable within 60 days.
Other Securities Ownership Information
Director Stock Retention Policy
Our director stock retention policy provides that, subject to certain exceptions for tax obligations and estate planning purposes, a non-employee member of the Board of Directors may not transfer any shares of the Company's common stock which he or she received as compensation for service on the Board of Directors until the value of the total shares held by the director equals or exceeds five times the amount of the annual cash retainer paid to such director.
Directors' Phantom Shares
Non-employee directors may elect to receive phantom shares by deferring all or a portion of their annual compensation (including the stock portion). A phantom share is a hypothetical share of our common stock based upon the fair market value of the common stock at the time of the grant.
Phantom shares granted prior to January 1, 2016 are not distributed until the director ceases to serve on the Board, at which time the Company will issue cash or shares of common stock in an amount equal to the value of the phantom shares. Effective January 1, 2016, directors may elect to receive distributions of deferred shares after five or seven years or at retirement pursuant to a post-deferral election. Distributions can be either via shares or cash and may be paid as a single payment or in five substantially similar annual installments.
Directors with phantom shares will earn dividend equivalents on each performance unit credited to and accumulated under their account. "Dividend Equivalents" means a dollar amount equal to the cash dividend that such director would have been entitled to receive if the director had been the owner, on the record date for a dividend paid on the Company's common stock, of a number of shares of common stock equal to the number of performance units then properly credited to and accumulated under the director's phantom share account.
Since phantom shares can be distributed in cash instead of stock, they are not included as shares beneficially owned by the directors under the Beneficial Ownership Table disclosed above. Several directors have elected to participate in the deferral option and the following table illustrates their accumulated phantom share balance as of December 31, 2023:
| | | | | |
| Phantom Share Ownership |
2.Name | Unless otherwise indicated, each named person has sole voting and investment power over the shares listed as beneficially owned and none of the shares listed are pledged as security. |
| Phantom Shares |
3.Pina Albo | As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed January 27, 2016, Blackrock, Inc. and its subsidiaries have sole voting and dispositive power over all the beneficially owned shares. |
| 7,211 |
4.Patricia L. Guinn | As reported on a Schedule 13G/A filed February 12, 2016, FMR LLC shares dispositive voting power with certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates and other companies, including FIAM LLC, Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Trust Company, FMR Co., Inc. and Strategic Advisers, Inc. |
| 1,986 |
5.Hazel M. McNeilage | As reported on Schedule 13G/A filed February 10, 2016, The Vanguard Group shares dispositive voting power of 43,551 shares with Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, its wholly-owned subsidiary and 7,300 shares with Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., its wholly-owned subsidiary. |
| 6,536 |
6.Stephen O'Hearn | Includes for Mr. Danahy 13,862 shares owned by John F. Danahy 2015 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust, of which Mr. Danahy is trustee. |
| 4,598 |
7.Steven C. Van Wyk | Includes for Mr. Henderson 3,000 shares owned by Bess L. Henderson Trust, of which Mr. Henderson is trustee and primary beneficiary. |
| 9,460 |
8. | Includes for Mr. Woodring 309,439 shares of common stock subject to stock options and/or SARs that are exercisable within 60 days.
|
| |
9. | Includes for Mr. Lay 61,620 shares of common stock subject to stock options and/or SARs that are exercisable within 60 days. Mr. Lay shares voting and investment power for all of the shares with his spouse. |
| |
10. | Includes for Ms. Manning 48,416 shares of common stock subject to stock options and/or SARs that are exercisable within 60 days. |
| |
11. | Includes for Mr. Néemeh 41,505 shares of common stock subject to stock options and/or SARs that are exercisable within 60 days. |
| |
12. | Includes for Ms. Kinnaird 25,807 shares of common stock subject to stock options and/or SARs that are exercisable within 60 days. |
| |
13. | Includes a total of 486,787 shares of common stock subject to stock options and/or SARs that are exercisable within 60 days. |
EXECUTIVE STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
In order to
Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines
To further align the interests of our management and our shareholders, our executive stock ownership guidelines provide that our senior executives should hold a specified number of shares of Company stock, expressed as a multiple of such executives' base salary. For 2023, these guidelines were as follows:
| | | | | |
| Ownership Guidelines |
| Position | |
Position | Share Ownership Requirement |
| President and Chief Executive Officer | 85,000 shares8x Base Salary |
President | 85,000 shares |
| Senior Executive Vice President | 36,000 shares5x Base Salary |
Executive Vice President and | 2x - 5x Base Salary |
| Senior Vice President | 2,500 – 23,000 shares1x - 2x Base Salary |
The number of shares includes only those shares of common stock that are directly or beneficially owned by the executive.executive plus unvested RSUs discounted by a notional tax rate. Executives who are subject to the guidelines must retain the net shares (net of applicable taxes for PCS and RSU awards and, for SARs and stock options, the net of exercise cost and taxes) from any SARs/SARs and stock option exercise or award of PCS or RSU until they satisfy the applicable stock ownership requirement.
As of December 31, 2015, Messrs. Woodring and Lay have met the stock ownership requirements through holdings of shares of our common stock. Due to promotions in 2015, both2023, Ms. Manning and Mr. Néemeh have significantly increasedLarson met their respective ownership requirements. As of December 31, 2015, bothMr. Cheng's ownership requirement increased in 2023 and he does not currently meet the requirement. Ms. Barbi and Mr. Herrmann joined RGA in January 2020 and November 2020, respectively, and have not yet
met those requirements. Ms. Kinnaird has not been employed by the Company for enough yearshad sufficient time to reasonably expect attainment of hermeet their stock ownership goals.requirement.
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEProhibitions against Short Sales, Hedging, Margin Accounts and Pledging
The Company's Insider Trading Policy (the "Policy") prohibits directors, executive officers, employees, and others from engaging in the following categories of transactions:
•short sales of Company securities;
•hedging or monetization transactions, including the use of prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds;
•holding Company securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan; and
•transactions in publicly-traded options, including puts, calls or other derivative securities in relation to Company securities.
In addition, the Policy strongly discourages the use of standing or limit orders on Company securities. The Policy's restrictions are intended to prevent a misalignment of interests with the Company's shareholders or the appearance of such a misalignment.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the SEC and the NYSE. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Forms 3, 4 and 5 they file.
Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms we have received or that were filed with the SEC, or written representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that all our directors, executive officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied with all filing requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions during 2015.2023.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Audit Committee Report
1. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our 2023 audited financial statements with Company executives. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed as required by auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"), SEC Rule 2-07 of Regulation S-X, Statement of Auditing Standards ("SAS") No. 114, "The Auditor's Communication With Those Charged With Governance." The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB Rule 3526, and has discussed with those accountants their independence. Based on those reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, for filing with the SEC. This report is provided by the following independent directors, who comprise the Audit Committee:
Patricia L. Guinn, Chair
Michele Bang
Khanh T. Tran
Steven C. Van Wyk
Proxy Solicitation
The solicitation will primarily be by Internet and mail and the expense thereof will be paid by the Company. In addition, proxies may be solicited by directors, officers or employees of the Company in person, or by telephone or other electronic means of communication. To aid in the solicitation of proxies, we have retained MacKenzie Partners, which will receive a fixed fee of approximately $15,000, in addition to the reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, for its performance of certain administrative services related to the solicitation. MacKenzie Partners will not make any recommendation to the shareholders regarding the approval or disapproval of any voting matters.
Other Business
The Board is not aware of any business other than the matters described in this Proxy Statement to be presented at the Annual Meeting. To the extent any matters not known at this time may properly come before the Annual Meeting, absent instructions to the contrary, the enclosed proxy will confer discretionary authority with respect to such other matters and it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote in accordance with their judgement on such matters.
Questions and Answers about the Annual Meeting
Who is asking for my vote and why?
The RGA Board of Directors is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of shareholders to be held on May 22, 2024, and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting. The Annual Meeting will only be held if there is a quorum, which means that a majority of the outstanding common stock entitled to vote is represented at the Annual Meeting by proxy or in person. To ensure that a quorum is present, the Board asks that you vote before the Annual Meeting, which allows your RGA stock to be represented at the meeting.
Who can vote at the Annual Meeting and how many votes do I have?
If you arewere a holder of record of Company common stock at the close of business on March 16, 2016,28, 2024, you are eligible to vote at the 20162024 Annual Meeting. For each matter presented for vote, you have one vote for each share you own.
2. How do I vote?
Your vote is important.Please cast your vote as soon as possible using one of the following methods.
By Telephone or Internet. All shareholders of record also can vote by touchtone telephone within the U.S., U.S. territories and Canada, using the toll-free telephone number on the proxy card, or through the Internet, using the procedures and instructions described on the proxy card. The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate shareholders’shareholders' identities, to allow shareholders to vote their shares and to confirm that their instructions have been recorded properly.You can vote via the Internet (www.proxyvote.com) or via telephone by calling 1-800-690-6903 by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 18, 2016.21, 2024.
By Written Proxy. All shareholders of record can vote by written proxy card. If you received a proxy card or voting instruction form in the mail, you may vote by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in the return envelope provided to you in accordance with the instructions provided with the proxy card. If you sign and return your proxy card but do not mark any selections giving specific voting instructions, your shares represented by that proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors.
In PersonAt the Meeting. All shareholders of record may vote in person at the meeting. Whether you plan to attend the meeting or not, we encourage you to vote by proxy as soon as possible. The proxy committee will vote your shares according to your directions.
3. Can I change my vote?
There are several ways in which you may revoke your proxy or change your voting instructions before the time of voting at the meeting:
•Vote again by telephone or at the Internet website.
•Mail a revised proxy card or voting instruction form that is dated later than the prior one.
•Vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
•Notify the Company’sCompany's Corporate Secretary in writing that a prior proxy is revoked or voting instructions are changed.
Please note that in orderfor your vote to be counted, the revocation or change must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 18, 2016.21, 2024.
Are the votes kept confidential?
4. All proxies, ballots and voting instruction forms are handled on a confidential basis to protect your voting privacy. This information will be disclosed only to those tabulating the vote, unless there is a proxy contest if the shareholder authorizes disclosure to defend legal claims or as otherwise required by law. Comments written on your proxy, ballot or voting instruction form are not confidential.
What is a Broker Non-Vote?
A "broker non-vote" occurs when a broker submits a proxy for the meeting with respect to a discretionary matter but does not vote on non-discretionary matters because the beneficial owner did not
provide voting instructions on those matters. Under NYSE rules, the proposal to ratify the appointment of independent auditors is considered a "discretionary" item. This means that brokerage firms may vote in their discretion on behalf of clients (beneficial owners) who have not furnished voting instructions at least 15 days before the date of the Annual Meeting.In contrast, all of the other proposals set forth in this Proxy Statement are "non-discretionary" items—brokerage firms that have not received voting instructions from their clients on these matters may not vote on these proposals.
5. Who pays for the solicitation of proxies?
The Company pays the cost of soliciting proxies. Proxies will be solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors by mail, telephone and other electronic means or in person.
6. How do I comment on Company business?
We collect comments from the proxy card if you vote by mailing the proxy card. You may also mail comments to our Corporate Secretary at our corporate headquarters. Although it is not possible to respond to each shareholder, your comments help us to understand your concerns.
7. Where can I find additional information about the Company?
The Company’s website, www.rgare.com, contains additional information about the Company, including:
|
| |
● | This Proxy Statement and our 2015 Annual Report to Shareholders; |
● | Our Principles of Ethical Business Conduct, Directors’ Code of Conduct and Financial Management Code of Professional Conduct (see page 10); |
● | Our Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and charters for the Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance and Finance, Investment and Risk Management Committees. The committee charters include a detailed description of the roles and responsibilities of each committee (see page 13); |
● | The process by which interested parties and shareholders can communicate with our directors and the Board; and |
● | Additional financial information can be found in the Quarterly Financial Supplement on the Investor Relations portion of the website in the "Quarterly Results" tab in the "Featured Report" section. |
Information on our website does not constitute part of this Proxy Statement.
You may also write us at our corporate headquarters, 16600 Swingley Ridge Road, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, to receive the following information, without charge:
|
| |
Shareholder Request | RGA Contact |
A copy of any of the codes of conduct or governance documents described above | Investor Relations |
A copy of our Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, this Proxy Statement, form of proxy card and our Annual Report to Shareholders | Corporate Secretary |
Interested parties and shareholders may communicate directly with our Chairman of the Board, Mr. Eason | General Counsel |
VOTING
Each share of common stock outstanding at the close of business on the record date, March 16, 2016, is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the other proposals to be voted on. Under Missouri corporate law, the approval of any action taken at the annual meeting is based on votes cast. If a quorum is present, the votes necessary to approve all proposals or to act on any other matters properly brought before the meeting, are the affirmative votes of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote which are present in person or represented by proxy at the 2016 Annual Meeting.
Shareholder approval occurs if the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast against the proposal. "Votes cast" on these proposals means votes "for" or "against" a particular proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast on these proposals and therefore have no effect on the outcome of these proposals. In uncontested elections, directors are elected by a majority of votes cast. Shares represented by proxies which are marked or voted "withhold authority" with respect to the election of any one or more nominees for election as Directors, proxies which are marked or voted "abstain" on the proposal to approve the Company’s executive compensation or the proposal to ratify the appointment the Company’s independent auditor, and proxies which are marked or voted to deny discretionary authority on any other matters will be counted for the purpose of determining the number of shares represented by proxy at the meeting. Such proxies will thus have the same effect as if the shares represented thereby were voted against such nominee or nominees, against the proposal to approve the Company’s executive compensation, against the proposal to ratify the appointment of the Company’s independent auditor and against any such other matters, respectively.
If a broker indicates on the proxy that it does not have discretionary authority as to certain shares to vote on a particular matter, those shares will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to that matter and thus will have no effect on the outcome of the vote with regard to such matters. Please note that brokers cannot vote uninstructed shares on your behalf in director elections or with regard to executive compensation matters. For your vote to be counted, you must submit your voting instruction form to your broker.
We know of no other matters to come before the meeting. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, theHow are proxies solicited, herebyand who pays for the solicitation of proxies?
Soliciting a proxy is the outreach to obtain the authorization of shareholders to vote on their behalf at a shareholder meeting.The Company pays the cost of soliciting proxies. Proxies will be votedsolicited on such matters in accordance with the judgmentbehalf of the persons voting such proxies. Board of Directors by mail, telephone and other electronic means or in person.
How do I comment on Company business?
We collect comments from the proxy card if you vote by mailing the proxy card. You may also mail comments to our Corporate Secretary at our corporate headquarters. Although it is not possible to respond to each shareholder, your comments help us to understand your concerns.
Where can I find additional information about the Company?
The Company's website, www.rgare.com, contains additional information about the Company, including:
•This Proxy Statement and our 2023 Annual Report to Shareholders;
•Our Code of Conduct, the Directors' Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and our Financial Management Code of Professional Conduct;
•Our Board's Corporate Governance Guidelines and charters for the Audit, Cybersecurity and Technology, Human Capital and Compensation, Investment, Nominating and Governance and Risk Committees. The committee charters include a detailed description of the roles and responsibilities of each committee;
•The process by which interested parties and shareholders can communicate with our directors and the Board; and
•Additional financial information can be found in the Quarterly Financial Supplements on the Investor Relations portion of our website.
Information on our website does not constitute part of this Proxy Statement.
You may also write us at our corporate headquarters, 16600 Swingley Ridge Road, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, to receive the following information, without charge:
| | | | | |
| Additional Information |
| Shareholder Request | RGA Contact |
| A copy of any of the codes of conduct or governance documents described above | Investor Relations |
| A copy of our Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, this Proxy Statement, form of proxy card and our Annual Report to Shareholders | Corporate Secretary |
| Interested parties and shareholders may communicate directly with our Chair of the Board | General Counsel |
Where can I find the results of the Annual Meeting?
Voting results will be disclosed in oura Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days following the 2024 Annual Meeting.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALSWhat is "Householding" of proxy materials?
Shareholder proposals submitted under the process prescribed by the SEC (in Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for presentation at the 2017 Annual Meeting must be received by us by December 7, 2016, for inclusion in our Proxy Statement and proxy relating to that meeting. Upon receipt of any such proposal, we will determine whether or not to include such proposal in the Proxy Statement and proxy in accordance with regulations governing the solicitation of proxies. We currently anticipate that the 2017 Annual Meeting will be held on May 18, 2017.
In order for a shareholder to bring business before a shareholder meeting, timely notice must be given to us within the time limits described above. Such notice must include a description of the proposed business, any material interest of the shareholder proponent or beneficial owner (or their respective affiliates, associates and those with whom they are acting in concert) in the proposed business; the text of the proposal or business (including the text of any resolutions proposed); and a description of all agreements and arrangements between or among such shareholder, beneficial owner and their respective affiliates, associates and those with whom they are acting in concert, and any other person in connection with the
proposal. Required disclosures should be updated and supplemented, if necessary, so that they are accurate as of the record date for a meeting and as of ten business days prior to the meeting. The shareholder proposing business or making a nomination (or a qualified representative of the shareholder) must appear at the applicable meeting of shareholders to present such business or nomination in order for it to be considered.
The Board or the presiding officer at the Annual Meeting may reject any such proposals that are not made in accordance with these procedures or that are not a proper subject for shareholder action in accordance with applicable law. The foregoing time limits also apply in determining whether notice is timely for purposes of rules adopted by the SEC relating to the exercise of discretionary voting authority. These requirements are separate from and in addition to the requirements a shareholder must meet to have a proposal included in our Proxy Statement. In each case, the notice must be given to our Secretary at our corporate headquarters.
HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those shareholders.This process, which is commonly referred to as "householding," potentially provides extra convenience for shareholders and cost savings for companies.Some brokers household proxy materials, delivering a single proxy statement to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholders.Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent.If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and
would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement or if your household currently receives multiple copies and would like to participate in householding in the future, please notify your broker.
How do I submit shareholder proposals or director nominations for the 2025 Annual Meeting?
Shareholder proposals submitted under the process prescribed by the SEC pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for presentation at the 2025 Annual Meeting must be received by us by December 12, 2024, for inclusion in our Proxy Statement relating to that meeting. Upon receipt of any such proposal, we will determine whether or not to include such proposal in the Proxy Statement and proxy in accordance with applicable SEC rules and regulations governing Rule 14a-8 shareholder proposals.
Additionally, our Bylaws include proxy access provisions which permit any shareholder, or group of up to 20 shareholders, owning at least three percent (3%) of the Company's outstanding stock continuously for at least three (3) years, to nominate and include in the Company's annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting up to two directors or 20% of the Board, whichever is greater, provided that the shareholders and nominees satisfy the requirements specified in our Bylaws. These provisions require that notice of any proxy access nomination be given to the Company not less than 120 nor more than 150 days prior to the anniversary of the date we commenced mailing of our proxy materials in connection with our most recent annual meeting of shareholders. Accordingly, with respect to our 2025 Annual Meeting, notice of any proxy access nomination must be provided to us no earlier than November 12, 2024, and no later than December 12, 2024. Any such notice made pursuant to these proxy access provisions must include the information and documents set forth in, and otherwise comply with, our Bylaws.
Further, in the event that any shareholder desires to propose business or nominate any director in connection with our 2025 Annual Meeting that is not submitted for inclusion in the Proxy Statement related to such annual meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 or our proxy access director nomination provisions (each as described above), any such shareholder must provide timely notice of such business or nomination in accordance with the advance notice provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. Under our Articles of Incorporation, any such notice must be given to the Company not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to our annual meeting of shareholders (provided that we have provided at least 70 days' prior notice or public disclosure of the date of such annual meeting).We currently anticipate that our 2025 Annual Meeting will be held on May 28, 2025.Accordingly, any notice of such business or director nomination with respect to our 2025 Annual Meeting must be provided to us no earlier than February 27, 2025, and no later than March 29, 2025. In addition, any proposal of such business or director nomination must include the information and documents set forth in, and otherwise comply with, our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. Further, shareholders making any such director nomination who intend to solicit proxies in accordance with the SEC's universal proxy rules for director nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 no later than February 10, 2025, and otherwise comply with Rule 14a-19 (which requirements under Rule 14a-19 are in addition to the requirements under our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws as described above).
In the event that any shareholder proposes business or makes a director nomination pursuant to the advance notice provisions set forth in our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, the shareholder proposing business or making a nomination (or a qualified representative of the shareholder) must appear at the applicable meeting of shareholders to present such business or nomination for it to be considered.
The Board or the presiding officer at the Annual Meeting may reject any director nominations or proposals that are not made in accordance with our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, or that are not a proper subject for shareholder action in accordance with applicable law. In addition, the foregoing time limits apply in determining whether notice is timely for purposes of rules adopted by the SEC relating to the exercise of discretionary voting authority. Any notices in connection with proposing
business or director nominations as described above must be given to our Secretary at our corporate headquarters.
Consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider shareholder nominations for directors who meet the notification, timeliness, consent, information and other requirements set forth in our Articles of Contents
USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURESIncorporation and Bylaws. The Committee makes no distinctions in evaluating nominees for positions on the Board based on whether or not a nominee is recommended by a shareholder, provided that the procedures with respect to nominations referred to above are followed. Potential candidates for nomination as directors must provide written information about their qualifications and participate in interviews conducted by individual Board members, including the Board chair and relevant committee chairs. Candidates are evaluated using the criteria adopted by the Board to determine their qualifications based on the information supplied by the candidates and information obtained from other sources. The Nominating and Governance Committee will recommend candidates to the Board for election as directors for approval, only if the Committee determines, in its judgment, that they have the specific minimum qualifications described above.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and federal securities laws including, among others, statements relating to projections of the future operations, strategies, earnings, revenues, income or loss, ratios, financial performance and growth potential of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (the "Company"). Forward-looking statements often contain words and phrases such as "anticipate," "assume," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "if," "intend," "likely," "may," "plan," "potential," "pro forma," "project," "should," "will," "would," and other words and terms of similar meaning or that are otherwise tied to future periods or future performance, in each case in all derivative forms. Forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on the Company. Forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified. Future events and actual results, performance, and achievements could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by or underlying the forward-looking statements.
Factors that could also cause results or events to differ, possibly materially, from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements, include, among others: (1) adverse changes in mortality (whether related to COVID-19 or otherwise), morbidity, lapsation or claims experience, (2) inadequate risk analysis and underwriting, (3) adverse capital and credit market conditions and their impact on the Company's liquidity, access to capital and cost of capital, (4) changes in the Company's financial strength and credit ratings and the effect of such changes on the Company's future results of operations and financial condition, (5) the availability and cost of collateral necessary for regulatory reserves and capital, (6) requirements to post collateral or make payments due to declines in the market value of assets subject to the Company's collateral arrangements, (7) action by regulators who have authority over the Company's reinsurance operations in the jurisdictions in which it operates, (8) the effect of the Company parent's status as an insurance holding company and regulatory restrictions on its ability to pay principal of and interest on its debt obligations, (9) general economic conditions or a prolonged economic downturn affecting the demand for insurance and reinsurance in the Company's current and planned markets, (10) the impairment of other financial institutions and its effect on the Company's business, (11) fluctuations in U.S. or foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, or securities and real estate markets, (12) market or economic conditions that adversely affect the value of
the Company's investment securities or result in the impairment of all or a portion of the value of certain of the Company's investment securities that in turn could affect regulatory capital, (13) market or economic conditions that adversely affect the Company's ability to make timely sales of investment securities, (14) risks inherent in the Company's risk management and investment strategy, including changes in investment portfolio yields due to interest rate or credit quality changes, (15) the fact that the determination of allowances and impairments taken on the Company's investments is highly subjective, (16) the stability of and actions by governments and economies in the markets in which the Company operates, including ongoing uncertainties regarding the amount of U.S. sovereign debt and the credit ratings thereof, (17) the Company's dependence on third parties, including those insurance companies and reinsurers to which the Company cedes some reinsurance, third-party investment managers and others, (18) financial performance of the Company's clients, (19) the threat of natural disasters, catastrophes, terrorist attacks, pandemics, epidemics or other major public health issues anywhere in the world where the Company or its clients do business, (20) competitive factors and competitors' responses to the Company's initiatives, (21) development and introduction of new products and distribution opportunities, (22) execution of the Company's entry into new markets, (23) integration of acquired blocks of business and entities, (24) interruption or failure of the Company's telecommunication, information technology or other operational systems, or the Company's failure to maintain adequate security to protect the confidentiality or privacy of personal or sensitive data and intellectual property stored on such systems, (25) adverse developments with respect to litigation, arbitration or regulatory investigations or actions, (26) the adequacy of reserves, resources and accurate information relating to settlements, awards and terminated and discontinued lines of business, (27) changes in laws, regulations, and accounting standards applicable to the Company or its business, including Long Duration Targeted Improvement accounting changes and (28) other risks and uncertainties described in this document and in the Company's other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
Forward-looking statements should be evaluated together with the many risks and uncertainties that affect the Company's business, including those mentioned in this document and described in the periodic reports the Company files with the SEC. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update these forward-looking statements, even though the Company's situation may change in the future, except as required under applicable securities law. For a discussion of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements, you are advised to see Item 1A – "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as may be supplemented by Item 1A – "Risk Factors" in the Company's subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and in our other periodic and current reports filed with the SEC.
Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (the "Company") discloses certain financial measures that are not determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The Company principally uses asuch non-GAAP financial measure calledmeasures in evaluating performance because the Company believes that such measures, when reviewed in conjunction with relevant U.S. GAAP measures, present a clearer picture of our operating incomeperformance and assist the Company in the allocation of its resources. The Company believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide investors and other third parties with a better understanding of the Company's results of operations, financial statements and the underlying profitability drivers and trends of the Company's businesses by excluding specified items which may not be indicative of the Company's ongoing operating performance and may fluctuate significantly from period to period. These measures should be considered supplementary to the Company's financial results that are presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be viewed as a basissubstitute for analyzingU.S. GAAP measures. Other companies may use similarly titled non-GAAP financial results. This measure also serves as a basis for establishing target levels and awards undermeasures that are
calculated differently from the Company’s management incentive programs. Management believes thatway the Company calculates such measures. Consequently, the Company's non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similar measures used by other companies.
The following non-GAAP financial measures are used in this document or in other public disclosures made by the Company from time to time:
1.Adjusted operating income, on a pre-tax and after-tax basis, and adjusted operating income per diluted share. The Company uses these measures as a basis for analyzing financial results because the Company believes that such measures better measuresreflect the ongoing profitability and underlying trends of the company’sCompany's continuing operations, primarily because that measure excludesoperations. Adjusted operating income is calculated as net income available to the Company's shareholders (or, in the case of pre-tax adjusted operating income, income before income taxes) excluding substantially all of the effect of net investment related gains and losses, as well as changes in the fair value of certain embedded derivatives, and related deferred acquisition costs. These itemschanges in the fair value of contracts that provide market risk benefits, any of which can be volatile primarily due toand may not reflect the credit market and interest rate environment, and are not necessarily indicative of theunderlying performance of the company’s underlyingCompany's businesses. Additionally, adjusted operating income excludes, to the extent applicable, any net gain or loss from discontinued operations, the cumulative effect of any accounting changes, the impact of certain tax-related items, and any other items that managementthe Company believes are not indicative of the company’sCompany's ongoing operations. The definition ofIn addition, adjusted operating income per diluted share is calculated as adjusted operating income divided by weighted average diluted shares outstanding. These measures also serve as a basis for establishing target levels and awards under the Company's management incentive programs.
2.Adjusted operating income (on a pre-tax and after-tax basis), excluding notable items. Notable items are items the Company believes may not be indicative of its ongoing operating performance which are excluded from adjusted operating income to provide investors and other third parties with a better understanding of the Company's results. Such items may be unexpected, unknown when the Company prepares its business plan or otherwise. Notable items presented may include the financial impact of the Company's assumption reviews on business subject to the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-12, "Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts" and related amendments, reflected in future policy benefits remeasurement gains or losses.
3.Adjusted operating revenue. This measure excludes the effects of net realized capital gains and losses, and changes in the fair value of certain embedded derivatives.
4.Shareholders' equity position excluding the impact of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI"), shareholders' average equity position excluding AOCI, and book value per share excluding the impact of AOCI. The Company believes that these measures provide useful information since such measures exclude AOCI-related items that are not permanent and can varyfluctuate significantly from period to period, and may not reflect the impact of the underlying performance of the Company's businesses on shareholders' equity and book value per share. AOCI primarily relates to changes in interest rates, credit spreads on its investment securities, future policy benefits discount rate measurement gains (losses), market risk benefits instrument-specific credit risk remeasurement gains (losses) and foreign currency fluctuations. The Company also discloses a non-GAAP financial measure called shareholders' average equity position excluding AOCI and notable items.
5.Adjusted operating return on equity. This measure is calculated as adjusted operating income divided by companyaverage shareholders' equity excluding AOCI. Adjusted operating return on equity also serves as a basis for establishing target levels and awards under the Company's management incentive programs. The Company also discloses a non-GAAP financial measure called adjusted operating return on equity excluding notable items, which is not considered a substitute forcalculated as
adjusted operating income excluding notable items divided by average shareholders' equity excluding notable items and AOCI.
Reconciliations of the foregoing non-GAAP financial measures (to the extent disclosed in this document) to the most comparable GAAP net income. Reconciliations to GAAP net incomefinancial measures, both before and after the adoption of Long-Duration Targeted Improvement accounting standards, are provided in the following tables.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
| Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures |
| (Dollars in millions) |
| (Unaudited) |
|
| Net income to adjusted operating income | Twelve Months Ended December 31 |
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
| Net income available to RGA shareholders | $ | 902 | | $ | 517 | | $ | 1,170 | |
| Reconciliation to adjusted operating income: | | | |
| Realized (gains) losses, derivatives and other, included in investment related gains (losses), net | 280 | | 352 | | (365) | |
| Market risk benefits remeasurement (gains) losses | (8) | | 8 | | (46) | |
| Realized (gains) losses on funds withheld, included in investment income, net of related expenses | (4) | | 19 | | (4) | |
| Embedded derivatives: | | | |
| Included in investment related gains/losses, net | 129 | | 137 | | (85) | |
| Included in interest credited | (5) | | (42) | | (36) | |
| Investment (income) loss on unit-linked variable annuities | 1 | | 19 | | (3) | |
| Interest credited on unit-linked variable annuities | (1) | | (19) | | 3 | |
| Interest expense on uncertain tax provisions | — | | — | | (21) | |
| Other | 29 | | (63) | | (1) | |
| Uncertain tax positions and other tax related items | 4 | | (5) | | (90) | |
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | 7 | | 4 | | — | |
| Adjusted operating income | 1,334 | | 927 | | 522 | |
| Notable items | — | | 184 | | 141 | |
| Adjusted operating income, excluding notable items | $ | 1,334 | | $ | 1,111 | | $ | 663 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Earnings per share | Twelve Months Ended December 31 |
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
| Diluted earnings per share from adjusted operating income | $19.88 | $13.69 | $7.64 |
| Earnings per share from net income: | | | |
| Basic earnings per share | $13.60 | $7.73 | $17.26 |
| Diluted earnings per share | $13.44 | $7.64 | $17.14 |
| Weighted average number of common and common | | | |
| equivalent shares outstanding (diluted) | 67,117 | 67,703 | 68,286 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Book value per share outstanding | |
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
| Common shares outstanding | 65,621 | | 66,676 | | 67,171 | | |
| | | | |
| Book value per share outstanding | $138.39 | $106.19 | $121.79 | |
| Less effect of AOCI: | | | | |
| Accumulated currency translation adjustments | $1.04 | $(1.73) | $(0.20) | |
| Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of securities | $(55.88) | $(82.44) | $56.27 | |
| Effect of updating discount rates on future policy benefits | $49.62 | $56.32 | $(62.67) | |
| Change in instrument-specific credit risk for market risk benefits | $0.05 | $0.19 | $(0.10) | |
| Pension and postretirement benefits | $(0.45) | $(0.41) | $(0.74) | |
| Book value per share outstanding, before impact of AOCI | $144.01 | $134.26 | $129.23 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
| Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures (pre-LDTI adoption basis) |
| (Dollars in millions) |
| (Unaudited) |
|
| Net income to adjusted operating income | Twelve Months Ended December 31 |
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
| Net income available to RGA shareholders | $ | 623 | | $ | 617 | | $ | 415 | |
| Reconciliation to adjusted operating income: | | | |
| Capital (gains) losses, derivatives and other, included in investment related gains/losses, net | 354 | | (338) | | (6) | |
| Capital (gains) losses on funds withheld, included in investment income, net of related expenses | 18 | | (4) | | 3 | |
| Embedded derivatives: | | | |
| Included in investment related gains/losses, net | 107 | | (79) | | 43 | |
| Included in interest credited | (42) | | (36) | | 16 | |
| DAC offset, net | (21) | | 30 | | (6) | |
| Investment (income) loss on unit-linked variable annuities | 19 | | (3) | | (9) | |
| Interest credited on unit-linked variable annuities | (19) | | 3 | | 9 | |
| Interest expense on uncertain tax provisions | 1 | | (21) | | 9 | |
| Non-investment derivatives and other | (62) | | (2) | | 1 | |
| Uncertain tax positions and other tax related items | (5) | | (90) | | 21 | |
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | 4 | | — | | — | |
| Adjusted operating income | 977 | | 77 | | 496 | |
Excluded adjustments for ABP purposes1 | 60 | | 158 | | — | |
| Adjusted operating income for ABP purposes | $ | 917 | | $ | (81) | | $ | 496 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Earnings per share | Twelve Months Ended December 31 |
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
| Diluted earnings per share from adjusted operating income | $14.43 | $1.13 | $7.54 |
Diluted earnings per share adjustments for ABP purposes1 | $0.70 | $2.31 | — |
| Diluted earnings per share from adjusted operating income for ABP purposes | $13.73 | $(1.18) | $7.54 |
| Earnings per share from net income: | | | |
| Basic earnings per share | $9.31 | $9.10 | $6.35 |
| Diluted earnings per share | $9.21 | $9.04 | $6.31 |
| Weighted average number of common and common | | | |
| equivalent shares outstanding (diluted) | 67,703 | 68,286 | 65,835 |
1Adjusted operating income per share for 2022 ABP purposes excludes variable investment income that is outside of a range of -50% to +50% from that assumed in our annual financial plan. In the aggregate for 2022, we reported variable investment income of $363.6 million, of which $60 million was excluded because of this adjustment, which equates to a reduction in earnings of $0.70 per diluted share. Adjusted operating income per share for 2021 ABP purposes excludes approximately $158 million of unrealized gains, net of tax, associated with the Company's investments in limited partnerships and private equity funds for which it utilizes the equity method of accounting, which equates to a reduction in earnings of $2.31 per diluted share. Unrealized gains on these types of investments were not contemplated when the 2021 ABP performance goals were established and therefore the Committee determined that it is more appropriate to exclude them from actual 2021 performance. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Book value per share outstanding | |
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
| Common shares outstanding | 66,676 | | 67,171 | | 67,957 | | 62,656 | |
| | | | |
| Book value per share outstanding | $62.16 | $193.75 | $211.19 | $185.17 |
| Less effect of AOCI: | | | | |
| Accumulated currency translation adjustments | $(2.56) | $(0.13) | $(1.02) | $(1.46) |
| Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of securities | $(81.10) | $55.09 | $80.94 | $52.65 |
| Pension and postretirement benefits | $(0.40) | $(0.74) | $(1.06) | $(1.12) |
| Book value per share outstanding, before impact of AOCI | $146.22 | $139.53 | $132.33 | $135.10 |
| | | | | |
Appendix A - Employee Stock Purchase Plan
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
Section 1.Purpose.
The purpose of this Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") is to provide employees of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated, a Missouri corporation (the "Company"), and its Designated Subsidiaries with an opportunity to purchase shares of Common Stock through accumulated Contributions funded by elective payroll deductions and to issue additional shares of Common Stock as a matching contribution by the Company pursuant to the terms of this Plan, thereby attracting, retaining and rewarding such employees and strengthening the mutuality of interest between the employees and shareholders of the Company. The Plan is not intended to qualify as an "employee stock purchase plan" under Section 423 of the Code.
Section 2.Definitions.
"Administrator" means the Human Capital and Compensation Committee of the Board (or any successor committee) or such other committee as designated by the Board to administer the Plan under Section 14.
"Applicable Laws" means the requirements relating to the administration of equity-based awards under U.S. state corporate laws, U.S. federal and state securities laws, the Code, the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, and the applicable laws of any foreign country or jurisdiction where Purchase Rights are, or will be, granted under the Plan.
"Board" means the Board of Directors of the Company.
"Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and the rulings and regulations issued thereunder.
"Common Stock" means the common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share, which the Company is currently authorized to issue or may in the future be authorized to issue.
"Company" has the meaning set forth in Section 1, and shall include any successor corporation.
"Compensation" means an Eligible Employee's base salary or base hourly rate of pay before deduction for any salary deferral contributions made by the Eligible Employee to any tax-qualified or nonqualified deferred compensation plan and salary reduction contributions to a cafeteria plan under Section 125 of the Code, but excluding AOCIcommissions, overtime, incentive compensation, bonuses and other forms of compensation; provided, however, that the Administrator, in its discretion, may establish a different definition of Compensation for any Offering or Offering Period.
"Contribution" means the Stock Purchase Deductions and any other payments that the Administrator may permit to be made by a Participant to fund the exercise of the Purchase Rights granted pursuant to the Plan.
"Designated Subsidiary" means any Subsidiary that has been designated by the Administrator from time to time in its sole discretion as eligible to participate in the Plan.
"Eligible Employee" means any person who is employed by the Company or any Designated Subsidiary as of an applicable Enrollment Date, excluding (i) any person who is an "officer" as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) (or any successor provision) of the Company under the Exchange Act, (ii) any person who is a non-GAAPcitizen or resident of a non-U.S. jurisdiction in which the
grant of a Purchase Right under the Plan would violate the law of such jurisdiction, (iii) any temporary or leased employees, interns, and employees on a leave of absence who are not being compensated through regular payroll, and (iv) any employees whose participation is precluded under Company policies or guidelines or applicable laws, rules or regulations, as determined by the Administrator from time to time.
"Employer" means the Company and each Designated Subsidiary.
"Enrollment Date" means the first day of each Offering Period.
"Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
"Fair Market Value" means, on a per share basis as of any date, the closing trading price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange or, if no sales of Common Stock are reported for such date, on the next preceding trading day for which a sale was reported. If there is no established public trading market for the Common Stock, the Fair Market Value thereof shall be determined in good faith by the Administrator.
"Fixed Contribution Amount" means, if permitted by the Administrator, a fixed amount of each payment of Compensation to a Participant during an Offering Period (in whole dollars only) that the Participant elects as Stock Purchase Deductions for such Offering Period not exceeding 10% of each such payment of Compensation; provided, however, that no deduction of the Percentage Contribution Amount may result in a Participant exceeding the aggregate Maximum Contribution Amount.
"Matching Percentage" means twenty-five percent (25%), or such lower percentage as the Administrator may specify and communicate to Participants prior to the Enrollment Date for any Offering Period to which such modification shall apply.
"Matching Common Stock", with respect to a Participant on a Purchase Date, means a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the product of (i) the Matching Percentage, multiplied by (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock purchased by the Participant upon the exercise of a Purchase Right on a Purchase Date, with such product rounded down to the nearest whole share. Any shares attributable to a fractional amount of Common Stock eliminated by rounding will not be issued.
"Maximum Contribution Amount" means, with respect to all Contributions by a Participant under the Plan during a Plan Year, fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) in the aggregate, or such other amount determined by the Administrator; provided, however, that in no event will the Maximum Contribution Amount for any Participant during any Plan Year exceed 10% of the Compensation payable to such Participant during such Plan Year.
"New Purchase Date" means the newly applicable Purchase Date resulting from the Administrator's determination to shorten any Offering Period then in progress pursuant to the terms of this Plan.
"Offering" means an offer under the Plan of a Purchase Right that may be exercised during an Offering Period as further described in Section 4. For purposes of the Plan, the Administrator may designate separate Offerings under the Plan (the terms of which need not be identical) in which Eligible Employees will participate.
"Offering Period" means each six (6) month period (or such other period specified by the Administrator) beginning on or after the Effective Date, with respect to which a Purchase Right granted pursuant to the Plan may be funded through Stock Purchase Deductions (and other Contributions permitted by the Plan). The duration and timing of Offering Periods may be
modified as provided in the Plan, including pursuant to Section 4. Offering Periods shall be communicated to Eligible Employees as determined by the Administrator.
"Parent" means the entity that owns greater than fifty percent (50%) of the aggregate voting interests in a Subsidiary.
"Participant" means an Eligible Employee who elects to participate in the Plan.
"Percentage Contribution Amount" means a percentage, that shall be no less than two percent (2%), and no greater than ten percent (10%), of each payment of Compensation to a Participant during an Offering Period that the Participant elects as Stock Purchase Deductions for such Offering Period; provided, however, that no deduction of the Percentage Contribution Amount may result in a Participant exceeding the aggregate Maximum Contribution Amount.
"Plan Year" means each calendar year during which the Plan is in effect.
"Purchase Date" means the last Trading Day of each Offering Period, or such earlier date as determined by the Administrator in accordance with the terms of this Plan.
"Purchase Price" means an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the Purchase Date.
"Purchase Right" means an option granted pursuant to Section 7 of the Plan entitling a Participant to purchase shares of Common Stock in accordance with the terms of the Plan.
"Restricted Period" means the one (1) year period beginning on a Purchase Date with respect to which Matching Common Stock is granted (or such shorter period determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion and communicated to Participants in accordance with procedures established by the Administrator).
"Section 409A" means Section 409A of the Code, and the regulations and guidance of general applicability issued thereunder.
"Share Reserve" has the meaning set forth in Section 13.
"Subsidiary" means any present or future corporation, trust, partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company or other entity, of which the Company or another Subsidiary owns greater than fifty percent (50%) of the aggregate voting interests in such entity.
"Stock Purchase Deduction" means an amount withheld from Compensation that has been authorized by a Participant to pay for the purchase of Common Stock in accordance with this Plan.
"Trading Day" means a day on which the national stock exchange upon which the Common Stock is listed is open for trading or, if the Common Stock is not listed on a national stock exchange, a business day as determined by the Administrator.
Section 3.Eligibility.
(1)Any Eligible Employee as of an applicable Enrollment Date will be eligible to participate in the Plan with respect to the related Offering Period, subject to complying with the enrollment procedures set forth in Section 5.
(2)Employees of the Company or any Designated Subsidiary who are citizens or residents of a non-U.S. jurisdiction (without regard to whether they are also are citizens or residents of the United States) may be excluded from participation in the Plan or an Offering if the participation of such employees is prohibited under the laws of the applicable non-U.S.
jurisdiction. In addition, pursuant to Section 14, the Administrator may establish one or more sub-plans of the Plan to provide benefits to employees of Designated Subsidiaries located outside the United States in a manner that complies with Applicable Law, and the rules of any such sub-plan may take precedence over other provisions of this Plan with respect to such sub-plan (with the exception of Section 13 of this Plan), provided that unless superseded by the terms of such sub-plan, the provisions of this Plan shall govern the operation of such sub-plan. Any such sub-plan will be a component of the Plan and will not be a separate plan.
Section 4.Offering Periods.
The Plan will be implemented by using consecutive Offering Periods with a new Offering Period commencing on the first Trading Day following the end of the preceding Offering Period, or at such other time as determined by the Administrator, and continuing thereafter until terminated in accordance with Section 19 hereof. The Administrator shall have the power to change the duration of Offering Periods (including the commencement dates thereof) without shareholder approval.
Section 5.Participation.
An Eligible Employee may participate in the Plan by, at least ten (10) business days (or such other period determined by the Administrator) prior to the Enrollment Date for the Offering Period for which such participation will commence, (i) submitting to the Company, a properly completed subscription agreement authorizing Stock Purchase Deductions in the form approved by the Administrator from time to time, and/or (ii) completing such documentation and following such procedures as prescribed by the Administrator. Except as otherwise determined by the Administrator, following such time that a Participant has elected to participate in this Plan for any Offering Period as set forth above, unless and until (i) such Participant has withdrawn any Contributions from the Plan in accordance with Section 10 or has withdrawn from the Plan pursuant to Section 11, or (ii) such Participant has made any change to the Stock Purchase Deductions of such Participant pursuant to Section 6(b), such Participant, without any further action of such Participant, shall be deemed to have elected to continue to participate in future Offering Periods at the then existing contribution level of such Participant.
Section 6.Contributions.
(1)At the time a Participant enrolls in the Plan pursuant to Section 5, the Participant will elect to have Stock Purchase Deductions made during the Offering Period by authorizing the after-tax withholding from each payment of Compensation during the Offering Period of (i) the Percentage Contribution Amount, or (ii) if the Administrator has provided for a Fixed Contribution Amount, the Fixed Contribution Amount (but not both); provided, however, that should a payment of Compensation occur on a Purchase Date, the Participant will have any Stock Purchase Deductions made on such day applied to his or her notional account for the subsequent Offering Period. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, in no event will the Percentage Contribution Amount and Fixed Contribution Amount, if applicable, together with any other Contributions pursuant to Section 6(c) below, of any Participant exceed the Maximum Contribution Amount for such Participant for any Plan Year.
(2)To the extent permitted by Applicable Laws, except as otherwise determined by the Administrator, a Participant may (i) cease participating in the Plan for an Offering Period and cause further Contributions during such Offering Period to cease, or (ii) decrease, but not increase, the Percentage Contribution Amount (or Fixed Contribution Amount, if applicable) for an Offering Period during such Offering Period, in each case, by completing such documentation and following such procedures at such time in advance of the Purchase Date as the Administrator shall prescribe; provided, that a Participant shall not take any such actions more than once during any Offering Period. Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator,
a Participant may not (x) change an election for a Percentage Contribution Amount applicable to an Offering Period to a Fixed Contribution Amount election for such Offering Period (or vice versa), or (y) make any other change to such Participant's Contributions for an Offering Period, in either case while such Offering Period is ongoing. A Participant who ceases Contributions during an Offering Period may not make additional Contributions to the Plan during that Offering Period, provided that, unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, Contributions shall continue with respect to such Participant consistent with the Participant's elections in place at the beginning of such Offering Period for subsequent Offering Periods, except as otherwise provided in Section 5. Any funds remaining in the Participant's notional account on the Purchase Date shall be used to exercise the Purchase Right pursuant to Section 8 below. In addition, a Participant may increase or decrease the rate of Stock Purchase Deductions for a future Offering Period by, at least ten (10) business days (or such other period determined by the Administrator) prior to the Enrollment Date for such future Offering Period, completing such documentation and following such procedures as prescribed by the Administrator.
(3)The Administrator, in its sole discretion, may permit Participants to contribute funds to the Plan prior to the Purchase Date of any Offering Period as an additional Contribution subject to such procedures and conditions determined by the Administrator.
(4)Stock Purchase Deductions of a Participant for an Offering Period will commence with the first payment of Compensation on or following the Enrollment Date and will end on the last payment of Compensation prior to the Purchase Date thereof, unless such Participant has ceased making Contributions during such Offering Period in accordance with Section 6, has withdrawn any Contributions from the Plan during such Offering Period in accordance with Section 10 or has withdrawn from the Plan pursuant to Section 11.
(5)All Contributions made for a Participant will be credited to his or her notional account under the Plan. Except for amounts not expended because of limitations under the Plan with respect to fractional shares, unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, no amount of accumulated Contributions shall be carried over with respect to any Participant from the end of one Offering Period to the beginning of another.
(6)Participants must make adequate provision for U.S. federal, state or local, or non-U.S. tax or other withholding obligations, if any, arising upon the exercise of the Purchase Right, the receipt of Common Stock from the Company or the lapsing of any Restricted Period applicable to Matching Common Stock. The Administrator may require that a Participant pay to the Employer (or make other arrangements satisfactory to the Administrator for the payment of) the amount of any U.S. federal, state or local, non-U.S. or other taxes that the Employer is required to withhold with respect to the purchase of Common Stock or the lapse of any Restricted Period for Matching Common Stock acquired under the Plan, or, in Administrator's sole discretion, instead direct the Employer to deduct from the Participant's wages or other compensation the amount of any such withholding taxes due with respect to the purchase of Common Stock or the lapse of any Restricted Period for any Matching Common Stock issued under the Plan.
Section 7.Grant of Purchase Rights.
On the Enrollment Date, each Participant participating in the applicable Offering Period will be granted an option to purchase on the applicable Purchase Date the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing (a) the Contributions accumulated for the Participant prior to the Purchase Date and retained in the Participant's notional account as of the Purchase Date (including amounts retained from prior Offering Periods in accordance with the Plan), by (b) the applicable Purchase Price for the Offering Period; provided, further, that such purchase will be subject to the limitations set forth in the Plan. Exercise of the Purchase Right will occur in accordance with Section 8. The Purchase Right will expire on the last day of the Offering Period.
Section 8.Exercise of Purchase Right.
(1)Unless a Participant has withdrawn all of such Participant's Contributions pursuant to Section 10 or has withdrawn from the Plan pursuant to Section 11, the Participant's Purchase Right will be exercised automatically on the Purchase Date, and, in connection with such exercise, (i) the maximum number of full shares of Common Stock that can be purchased pursuant to the Purchase Right will be purchased automatically, and (ii) the Matching Common Stock, subject to a risk of forfeiture as provided in Section 9(b), will be purchased automatically, in any such case, on the Purchase Date. No fractional shares will be issued in connection therewith, and unless otherwise provided by the Administrator, any Contributions accumulated in a Participant's notional account that are not sufficient to purchase a full share of Common Stock will be retained in the Participant's notional account for the subsequent Offering Period. Any other funds left over in a Participant's notional account after the Purchase Date will be returned to the Participant as soon as administratively practicable. During a Participant's lifetime, the Purchase Rights granted to the Participant are exercisable only by the Participant.
(2)If the Administrator determines that on any Purchase Date, the number of shares of Common Stock (including Matching Common Stock) that are issuable with respect to the exercise of Purchase Rights on such Purchase Date will exceed (i) the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan on the Enrollment Date, or (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock available under the Plan on such Purchase Date, the Administrator may in its sole discretion (x) provide that the Company will make a pro rata allocation of the shares of Common Stock available for purchase (and available for issuance as Matching Common Stock) on such Enrollment Date or Purchase Date, as applicable, in as uniform a manner as the Administrator determines in its sole discretion to be equitable among all Participants exercising Purchase Rights on such Purchase Date, and continue all Offering Periods then in effect, or (y) provide that the Company will make a pro rata allocation of the shares of Common Stock available for purchase (or available for issuance as Matching Common Stock) on such Enrollment Date or Purchase Date, as applicable, in as uniform a manner as it determines in its sole discretion to be equitable among all Participants exercising Purchase Rights on such Purchase Date, and terminate any or all Offering Periods then in effect pursuant to Section 19. The Company may make a pro rata allocation of the shares available on the Enrollment Date of any applicable Offering Period pursuant to the preceding sentence, notwithstanding any authorization of additional shares for issuance under the Plan by the Company's shareholders subsequent to such Enrollment Date.
Section 9.Delivery; Vesting of Matching Common Stock.
(1)As soon as reasonably practicable on or after each Purchase Date on which any issuance of shares of Common Stock occurs pursuant to this Plan, subject to Section 9(b) below with respect to Matching Common Stock, the Company will arrange the delivery to each Participant of the shares issued to such Participant upon exercise of his or her Purchase Rights in a form determined by the Administrator (in its sole discretion) and pursuant to rules established by the Administrator. The Company may permit or require that shares be deposited directly with a broker designated by the Company or to a designated agent of the Company, and the Company may utilize electronic or automated methods of share transfer. In addition, the Administrator may establish other necessary procedures in connection therewith, including to implement the transfer restrictions with respect to the Matching Common Stock set forth in Section 9(b) below. Subject to Section 9(b) below, no Participant will have any voting, dividend, or other rights of a shareholder with respect to shares of Common Stock subject to any Purchase Right granted under the Plan until such shares have been issued and delivered to the Participant as provided in this Section 9(a).
(2)Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, no Matching Common Stock may be assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of by any Participant during the
Restricted Period. In addition, unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, in the event a Participant ceases to be an employee of the Company or its Subsidiaries at any time during the Restricted Period with respect to any Matching Common Stock held by the Participant, such Matching Common Stock shall be forfeited back to the Company without any consideration and without further action by the Company or the Participant, and the Participant shall have no further rights with respect thereto. No Participant shall have any voting, dividend, or other rights as a shareholder with respect to the Matching Common Stock until such shares have been delivered to the Participant upon termination the Restricted Period with respect thereto. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event a dividend is paid in respect of any Matching Common Stock during the Restricted Period, the dividends that a Participant would have received on account of such Matching Common Stock during the Restricted Period shall be accumulated and paid to the Participant only if and at such time that the risk of forfeiture thereon lapses and the Matching Common Stock is released to the Participant free of such restrictions.
Section 10.Withdrawal.
At any time, a Participant may withdraw all, or less than all, Contributions credited to such Participant's notional account that have not yet been used to exercise Purchase Rights under the Plan by submitting such documentation to the Company and following such procedures as prescribed by the Administrator; provided, however, that, unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, a Participant may not make more than one such withdrawal request during any Offering Period). In the event that a Participant elects to withdraw Contributions in accordance with the preceding sentence, (a) the amount of such Contributions the Participant has elected to withdraw will be paid to such Participant as soon as administratively practicable after receipt of notice of withdrawal, (b) such Participant's Purchase Right for the Offering Period will be automatically terminated with respect to the withdrawn Contributions, and (c) no further Contributions shall be made by such Participant for the Offering Period in which such withdrawal occurs. If a Participant withdraws from the Plan, Stock Purchase Deductions will not resume for such Participant for any further Offering Periods unless the Participant re-enrolls in the Plan in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.
Section 11.Termination of Employment.
Upon a Participant's failure to qualify as an Eligible Employee for any reason, such Participant will be deemed to have elected to withdraw from the Plan as of the date of such failure, and the Contributions credited to such Participant's notional account during the Offering Period in which such failure occurs, but not yet used to purchase shares of Common Stock under the Plan, will be paid to such Participant or, in the case of the Participant's death, to the person or persons entitled thereto under Section 15, and all of such Participant's unexercised Purchase Rights will be automatically thereupon be terminated.
Section 12.Interest.
Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, no interest will accrue on the Contributions of a Participant in the Plan, except as may be required by Applicable Law as determined by the Administrator.
Section 13.Common Stock.
Subject to adjustment upon changes in capitalization of the Company as provided in Section 18(a) hereof, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that will be made available for sale or issuance under the Plan will be 100,000 shares of Common Stock (the "Share Reserve"), without any annual limit. If any shares of Matching Common Stock are forfeited by a Participant pursuant to Section 9(b), such shares shall again be available for issuance under the Plan.
Section 14.Administration.
The Plan shall be administered by the Administrator. Any power granted to the Administrator under the Plan may also be exercised by the Board. The Administrator will have full and exclusive discretionary authority to construe, interpret and apply the terms of the Plan, to designate separate Offerings under the Plan, to determine eligibility, to adjudicate all disputed claims filed under the Plan and to establish such procedures that it deems necessary for the administration of the Plan (including, without limitation, to adopt such procedures and sub-plans in accordance with Section 3(b) of this Plan as are necessary or appropriate to permit the participation in the Plan by Eligible Employees who are foreign nationals or employed outside the United States). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Administrator is specifically authorized to adopt rules and procedures regarding the eligibility to participate, determination of Compensation, handling of Contributions, transfer of Contributions to the Plan (including, without limitation, in forms other than payroll deductions), establishment of bank or trust accounts to hold Contributions, payment of interest, conversion of local currency, satisfaction of obligations to pay or withhold payroll and other taxes, determination and processing of beneficiary designations, withholding procedures and handling of delivery of shares of Common Stock that vary from applicable local requirements. To the fullest extent permitted by Applicable Law, the Administrator may also delegate some or all of its responsibilities, including the authority to assist the Administrator in the day-to-day administration of the Plan, to any officers of the Company or its Subsidiaries or a subcommittee of the Administrator, and, to the extent there has been any such delegation, any reference in the Plan to the Administrator shall include such delegate of the Administrator. In addition, the Administrator shall be entitled to retain any third-party broker-dealer, financial measureinstitution, clearing agent, transfer agent or other agent to perform any functions in connection with the Plan as deemed appropriate by the Administrator. Every finding, decision and determination made by the Administrator will, to the fullest extent permitted by Applicable Laws, be final and binding upon all parties.
Section 15.Designation of Beneficiary.
(1)If permitted by the Administrator, a Participant may designate a beneficiary who is to receive any shares of Common Stock and cash, if any, from the Participant's notional account under the Plan in the event of such Participant's death subsequent to a Purchase Date on which the Purchase Right is exercised but prior to delivery to such Participant of such shares and cash. In addition, if permitted by the Administrator, a Participant may designate a beneficiary who is to receive any cash from the Participant's notional account under the Plan in the event of such Participant's death prior to exercise of the Purchase Right. Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator, if a Participant is married and the designated beneficiary is not the spouse, spousal consent will be required for such designation to be effective.
(2)Such designation of beneficiary may be changed by the Participant at any time by notice in a form determined by the Administrator. In the event of the death of a Participant and in the absence of a beneficiary validly designated under the Plan who is living at the time of such Participant's death, the Company will deliver such shares and/or cash to the executor or administrator of the estate of the Participant, or to such other person as may be designated by the Administrator in accordance with Applicable Law.
(3)All beneficiary designations will be in such form and manner as the Administrator may designate from time to time.
Section 16.Transferability.
Neither Contributions credited to a Participant's notional account nor any rights with regard to the exercise of a Purchase Right or otherwise to receive shares of Common Stock
under the Plan may be assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of in any way (other than by will, the laws of descent and distribution or as provided in Section 15) by the Participant. Any such attempt at assignment, transfer, pledge or other disposition will be null and void and without effect, except that management believes is importantthe Company may treat any such act as an election to withdraw funds from an Offering Period in evaluatingaccordance with Section 10 hereof.
Section 17.Use of Funds.
The Company may use all funds held as Stock Purchase Deductions and other Contributions received or held by it under the balance sheetPlan for any corporate purpose, and the Company will not be obligated to segregate such Contributions except under Offerings in which applicable local law requires that Contributions to the Plan by Participants be segregated from the Company's general corporate funds and/or deposited with an independent third party for Participants in non-U.S. jurisdictions.
Section 18.Adjustments, Dissolution, Liquidation, Merger or Other Corporate Transaction.
(1)In the event that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Common Stock, other securities, or other property, but excluding normal cash dividends), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase, or exchange of Common Stock or other securities of the Company, or other change in the corporate structure of the Company affecting the Common Stock occurs, the Administrator, in order to ignoreprevent dilution or enlargement of the effectsbenefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Plan, will, in any such manner as it deems equitable, adjust the number and class of unrealizedCommon Stock that may be delivered under the Plan, the Purchase Price per share and the number of shares of Common Stock covered by each Purchase Right under the Plan that has not yet been exercised, and the amount of the Share Reserve pursuant to Section 13.
(2)In the event of any proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, any Offering Period then in progress will be shortened by setting a New Purchase Date, and will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed dissolution or liquidation, unless otherwise provided by the Administrator. The New Purchase Date shall be prior to the date of the Company's proposed dissolution or liquidation. Prior to the New Purchase Date, the Administrator will notify each Participant in writing (or electronically) that the Purchase Date for the Participant's Purchase Right has been changed to the New Purchase Date and that the Participant's Purchase Right will be exercised automatically on the New Purchase Date, unless prior to such date such Participant has withdrawn all of the Contributions of such Participant pursuant to Section 10 or has withdrawn from the Plan pursuant to Section 11.
(3)In the event of a merger, sale of substantially all of the assets or other similar corporate transaction involving the Company, each outstanding Purchase Right will be assumed or an equivalent Purchase Right substituted by the successor corporation or a Parent or Subsidiary of the successor corporation. In the event that the successor corporation refuses to assume or substitute for the Purchase Right or as otherwise determined by the Administrator, the Offering Period with respect to which such Purchase Right relates will be shortened by setting a New Purchase Date on which such Offering Period shall end. The New Purchase Date will occur before the date of the Company's proposed merger, substantially all asset sale or other similar corporate transaction. Prior to the New Purchase Date, the Administrator will notify each Participant in writing or electronically that the Purchase Date for the Participant's Purchase Right has been changed to the New Purchase Date and that the Participant's Purchase Right will be exercised automatically on the New Purchase Date, unless prior to such date such Participant has withdrawn all of its contributions pursuant to Section 10 or has withdrawn from the Plan pursuant to Section 11.
Section 19.Amendment or Termination.
(1)The Administrator, in its sole discretion, may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the Plan, or any part thereof, at any time and for any reason; provided, however, that this Plan may not be amended without approval of the Company's shareholders if such approval is necessary to comply with any Applicable Laws (including the rules of the New York Stock Exchange) for which or with which the Administrator deems it necessary or desirable to comply. If the Plan is terminated, the Administrator, in its discretion, may elect to terminate all outstanding Offering Periods either immediately or upon exercise of the Purchase Rights on the next Purchase Date (which may be sooner than originally scheduled, if determined by the Administrator in its discretion), or may elect to permit Offering Periods to expire in accordance with their terms. If any Offering Periods are terminated prior to expiration, all amounts primarily associatedthen credited to Participants' notional accounts that have not been used to purchase shares of Common Stock will be returned to the Participants (without interest thereon, except as otherwise required under local laws, as further set forth in Section 12) as soon as administratively practicable.
(2)For the avoidance of doubt, and without the approval of the Company's shareholders and without regard to whether any Participant rights may be considered to have been adversely affected, the Administrator will be entitled to change the Offering Periods, designate separate Offerings, limit the frequency and/or number of changes in the amount withheld during an Offering Period, establish the exchange ratio applicable to amounts withheld in a currency other than U.S. dollars, permit payroll withholding in excess of the amount designated by a Participant in order to adjust for delays or mistakes in the Company's processing of properly completed withholding elections, establish reasonable waiting and adjustment periods and/or accounting and crediting procedures to ensure that amounts applied toward the purchase of Common Stock for each Participant properly correspond with mark-to-market adjustmentsContribution amounts, and establish such other limitations or procedures as the Administrator determines in its sole discretion advisable that are consistent with the Plan.
(3)Without the approval of the Company's shareholders and without regard to whether any Participant rights may be considered to have been adversely affected, in the event the Administrator determines that the ongoing operation of the Plan may result in unfavorable financial accounting consequences, the Administrator may, in its discretion and, to the extent necessary or desirable, modify, amend or terminate the Plan to mitigate, eliminate or otherwise address such accounting consequence.
Section 20.Code Section 409A.
Neither the grant of any Purchase Rights nor the grant and vesting of any Matching Common Stock are intended to constitute a "deferral of compensation" within the meaning of Section 409A on investmentsaccount of the Plan being a short-term deferral within the meaning of U.S. Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4), and foreign currency translation.any ambiguities herein shall be interpreted to so that the Plan is not subject to Section 409A. In furtherance of the foregoing and notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, if the Administrator determines that a Purchase Right granted under the Plan may be subject to Section 409A or that any Plan provision would cause a Purchase Right under the Plan to be subject to Section 409A, the Administrator may amend the terms of the Plan and/or of an outstanding Purchase Right granted under the Plan, or take such other action the Administrator determines is necessary or appropriate, in each case, without the Participant's consent, to exempt any outstanding or future Purchase Right that may be granted under the Plan from or to allow any such Purchase Rights to comply with Section 409A, but only to the extent any such amendments or action by the Administrator would not violate Section 409A or Applicable Law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries shall have any liability to a Participant or any other party if the Purchase Rights granted pursuant to the Plan that is intended to be exempt
103
Operating return on equity is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as operating income divided by average shareholders’ equity excluding AOCI.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and Subsidiaries |
| Reconciliation of Consolidated Net Income to Operating Income |
| (Dollars in thousands) |
| (Unaudited) |
| | | Twelve Months Ended December 31 | | |
| | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | |
| GAAP net income | $502,166 | | $684,047 | | $418,837 | | |
| Reconciliation to operating income: |
| |
| |
| | |
| Capital (gains) losses, derivatives and other, included in investment related (gains) losses, net | 30,020 |
| | (64,625 | ) | | 103,495 |
| | |
| Capital (gains) losses on funds withheld, included in investment income | (10,640 | ) | | (8,590 | ) | | (8,345 | ) | | |
| Embedded derivatives: |
| |
| |
| | |
| | Included in investment related (gains) losses, net | 85,789 |
| | (44,941 | ) | | (137,948 | ) | | |
| | Included in interest credited | (8,178 | ) | | (274 | ) | | (51,330 | ) | | |
| DAC offset, net | (31,996 | ) | | 72,721 |
| | 63,966 |
| | |
| Non-investment derivatives | (77 | ) | | (289 | ) | | --- |
| | |
| Gain on repurchase of collateral finance facility securities | --- | | --- | | (30,229 | ) | | |
| | Operating income | $567,084 | | $638,049 | | $358,446 | | |
| | | Twelve Months Ended December 31 | | |
| | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | |
| Diluted earnings per share from operating income | $8.43 | | $9.12 | | $4.95 | | |
| Earnings per share from net income: |
| |
| |
| | |
| | Basic earnings per share | $7.55 | | $9.88 | | $5.82 | | |
| | Diluted earnings per share | $7.46 | | $9.78 | | $5.78 | | |
| Weighted average number of common and common |
| |
| |
| | |
| | equivalent shares outstanding (diluted) | 67,292 |
| | 69,962 |
| | 72,461 |
| | |
| | | At December 31 |
| | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Common shares outstanding | 65,205 |
| | 68,773 |
| | 70,768 |
| | 73,927 |
| Book value per share outstanding | $94.09 | | $102.13 | | $83.87 | | $93.47 |
| | Less effective of FAS115 | $14.35 | | $23.63 | | $11.59 | | $25.40 |
| | Less effect of CTA | $(2.78) | | $1.19 | | $2.93 | | $3.62 |
| | Less effect of pension benefit | $(0.71) | | $(0.72) | | $(0.31) | | $(0.50) |
| Book value per share outstanding, before impact of AOCI | $83.23 | | $78.03 | | $69.66 | | $64.95 |
Section 21.Notices.
All notices or other communications by a Participant to the Company under or in connection with the Plan will be deemed to have been duly given when received in the form and manner specified by the Company at the location, or by the person, designated by the Company for the receipt thereof.
Section 22.Conditions Upon Issuance of Shares.
(1)Shares of Common Stock will not be issued with respect to a Purchase Right unless the exercise of such Purchase Right and the issuance and delivery of such shares pursuant thereto will comply with all Applicable Law. The Company may, if so determined by the Administrator, defer or cancel the issuance or delivery of shares of Common Stock pursuant to this Plan or take other actions the Administrator deems appropriate to the extent that the Administrator determines that Applicable Laws restricts such issuance or delivery.
(2)As a condition to the exercise of a Purchase Right, the Company may require the person exercising such Purchase Right to represent and warrant at the time of any such exercise that the shares are being purchased only for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such shares if, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, such a representation is required by any Applicable Law.
Section 23.Term of Plan.
The Plan will become effective on May 22, 2024 (the "Effective Date"), provided that the Plan has been approved by the shareholders of the Company on such date (the date of such shareholder approval, the "Effective Date"). Once effective, the Plan will continue in effect until terminated pursuant to Section 19.
Section 24.Governing Law.
This Plan and any agreements or other documents hereunder shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Missouri.
Section 25.Severability.
If any provision of the Plan is or becomes or is deemed to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable for any reason in any jurisdiction or as to any Participant, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as to such jurisdiction or Participant as if the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had not been included.
Section 26.Interpretation.
Headings are given to the Sections and subsections of the Plan solely as a convenience to facilitate reference and shall not be deemed in any way material or relevant to the construction or interpretation of the Plan or any provision thereof. Words in the masculine gender shall include the feminine gender, and where appropriate, the plural shall include the singular and the singular shall include the plural. The use herein of the word “including” following any general statement, term or matter shall not be construed to limit such statement, term or matter to the specific items or matters set forth immediately following such word or to similar items or matters, whether or not non-limiting language (such as "without limitation," "but not
limited to," or words of similar import) is used with reference thereto, but rather shall be deemed to refer to all other items or matters that could reasonably fall within the broadest possible scope of such general statement, term or matter. References herein to any agreement, instrument or other document mean such agreement, instrument or other document as amended, supplemented and modified from time to time to the extent permitted by the provisions thereof and not prohibited by the Plan.
Section 27.No Contract of Employment.
Nothing in this Plan shall be construed to constitute a contract of employment between Employer and any individual or to be an inducement for the employment of any individual. Nothing contained in this Plan shall be deemed to give any individual the right to be retained in the service of Employer or to interfere with the right of Employer to discharge any individual at any time, with or without cause, regardless of the effect which such discharge may have upon any such individual as a Participant of the Plan.
